World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 50 2773 2534 1343 1211 217 9843

Emily C. Williams publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Emily C. Williams between 2002 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Emily C. Williams published across 25 years, from 2002 to 2026, averaging 12.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2022. 28 of the 321 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2022. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 5 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 28 publications 2022: 37 publications 2023: 34 publications 2024: 28 publications 2025: 27 publications 2026: 1 publication
2002 2026

321 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Emily C. Williams: publications per year, 2002 to 2026
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 0
2004 0
2005 1
2006 5
2007 5
2008 2
2009 2
2010 6
2011 4
2012 10
2013 8
2014 12
2015 13
2016 16
2017 17
2018 23
2019 18
2020 23
2021 28
2022 37
2023 34
2024 28
2025 27
2026 1
Total 321
Download as CSV

Emily C. Williams publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emily C. Williams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 214–223 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 217 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246 217
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Emily C. Williams D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emily C. Williams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187 50
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Emily C. Williams is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States and has a significant body of research in the field of Medicine. Their work spans multiple subfields, including Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Infectious Diseases, and Clinical Psychology.

Williams's research focuses on several main topics, such as Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes, Opioid Use Disorder Treatment, HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk, HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions, Health Policy Implementation Science, Homelessness and Social Issues, and Primary Care and Health Outcomes.

Their recent notable papers include:

  • The impact of methamphetamine/amphetamine use on receipt and outcomes of medications for opioid use disorder: a systematic review (2021, Addiction Science & Clinical Practice)
  • Community engagement and clinical trial diversity: Navigating barriers and co-designing solutions-A report from the "Health Equity through Diversity" seminar series (2023, PLoS ONE)
  • Racial/ethnic discrimination and alcohol use disorder severity among United States adults (2020, Drug and Alcohol Dependence)
  • Comparison of Substance Use Disorder Diagnosis Rates From Electronic Health Record Data With Substance Use Disorder Prevalence Rates Reported in Surveys Across Sociodemographic Groups in the Veterans Health Administration (2022, JAMA Network Open)
  • Integrating Alcohol-Related Prevention and Treatment Into Primary Care (2023, JAMA Internal Medicine)

Williams frequently publishes in venues such as Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, AIDS and Behavior, Journal of Addiction Medicine, and Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment.

Collaborations with other researchers are prominent in Williams's work. Frequent co-authors include Madeline C. Frost, Elizabeth J. Austin, E. Jennifer Edelman, Jessica Chen, and Eric J. Hawkins.

Best Publications

  • AUDIT-C as a Brief Screen for Alcohol Misuse in Primary Care

    Katharine A. Bradley;Anna F. DeBenedetti;Robert J. Volk;Emily C. Williams

  • Effectiveness of the AUDIT-C as a Screening Test for Alcohol Misuse in Three Race/Ethnic Groups

    Danielle Frank;Anna F. DeBenedetti;Robert J. Volk;Emily C. Williams

  • Alcohol Use and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infection: Current Knowledge, Implications, and Future Directions.

    Emily C. Williams;Emily C. Williams;Judith A. Hahn;Richard Saitz;Kendall Bryant

  • Implementation of evidence-based alcohol screening in the Veterans Health Administration.

    Katharine A Bradley;Emily C Williams;Carol E Achtmeyer;Bryan Volpp

  • AUDIT-C Scores as a Scaled Marker of Mean Daily Drinking, Alcohol Use Disorder Severity, and Probability of Alcohol Dependence in a U.S. General Population Sample of Drinkers

    Anna D. Rubinsky;Deborah A. Dawson;Emily C. Williams;Emily C. Williams;Daniel R. Kivlahan;Daniel R. Kivlahan

  • Risk of mortality and physiologic injury evident with lower alcohol exposure among HIV infected compared with uninfected men

    Amy C. Justice;Kathleen A. McGinnis;Janet P. Tate;R. Scott Braithwaite

  • Strategies to implement alcohol screening and brief intervention in primary care settings: a structured literature review.

    Emily C. Williams;M. Laura Johnson;Gwen T. Lapham;Ryan M. Caldeiro

  • Alcohol Screening Scores and Medication Nonadherence

    Chris L. Bryson;David H. Au;Haili Sun;Emily C. Williams

  • Quality concerns with routine alcohol screening in VA clinical settings

    Katharine A. Bradley;Gwen T. Lapham;Gwen T. Lapham;Eric J. Hawkins;Eric J. Hawkins;Carol E. Achtmeyer

  • How primary care providers talk to patients about alcohol: a qualitative study.

    Kinsey A. McCormick;Nancy E. Cochran;Anthony L. Back;Joseph O. Merrill;Joseph O. Merrill

  • Increased documented brief alcohol interventions with a performance measure and electronic decision support.

    Gwen T. Lapham;Carol E. Achtmeyer;Emily C. Williams;Eric J. Hawkins

  • Adverse Childhood Experiences, Military Service, and Adult Health

    Jodie G. Katon;Jodie G. Katon;Jodie G. Katon;Keren Lehavot;Keren Lehavot;Tracy L. Simpson;Tracy L. Simpson;Emily C. Williams;Emily C. Williams

  • How primary care providers talk to patients about alcohol

    Kinsey A. McCormick;Nancy E. Cochran;Anthony L. Back;Joseph O. Merrill

  • Readiness to Change in Primary Care Patients Who Screened Positive for Alcohol Misuse

    Emily C. Williams;Daniel R. Kivlahan;Richard Saitz;Joseph O. Merrill

  • Level of Alcohol Use Associated with HIV Care Continuum Targets in a National U.S. Sample of Persons Living with HIV Receiving Healthcare

    Emily C Williams;Emily C Williams;Kathleen A McGinnis;E Jennifer Edelman;Theresa E Matson;Theresa E Matson

  • Factors Underlying Quality Problems with Alcohol Screening Prompted by a Clinical Reminder in Primary Care: A Multi-site Qualitative Study

    Emily C. Williams;Emily C. Williams;Carol E. Achtmeyer;Rachel M. Thomas;Joel R. Grossbard

  • Do Brief Measures of Readiness to Change Predict Alcohol Consumption and Consequences in Primary Care Patients With Unhealthy Alcohol Use

    Emily C. Williams;Nicholas J. Horton;Jeffrey H. Samet;Richard Saitz

  • Barriers to and Facilitators of Alcohol Use Disorder Pharmacotherapy in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study in Five VA Clinics

    Emily C. Williams;Emily C. Williams;Carol E. Achtmeyer;Jessica P. Young;Douglas Berger;Douglas Berger

  • An early evaluation of implementation of brief intervention for unhealthy alcohol use in the US Veterans Health Administration.

    Emily C. Williams;Anna D. Rubinsky;Laura J. Chavez;Laura J. Chavez;Gwen T. Lapham;Gwen T. Lapham

  • Racial/ethnic workplace discrimination: association with tobacco and alcohol use.

    Laura J. Chavez;Laura J. Chavez;India J. Ornelas;Courtney R. Lyles;Emily C. Williams;Emily C. Williams

Frequent Co-Authors

Katharine A. Bradley
Katharine A. Bradley University of Washington
Daniel R. Kivlahan
Daniel R. Kivlahan University of Washington
Amy C. Justice
Amy C. Justice Yale University
Derek D. Satre
Derek D. Satre University of California, San Francisco
Keren Lehavot
Keren Lehavot University of Washington
David A. Fiellin
David A. Fiellin Yale University
Evette J. Ludman
Evette J. Ludman Kaiser Permanente
Tracy L. Simpson
Tracy L. Simpson University of Washington
Alex H. S. Harris
Alex H. S. Harris Stanford University
Brandon D. L. Marshall
Brandon D. L. Marshall Brown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens the door to a diverse range of rewarding online degree programs and career paths. If you want to make a significant impact quickly, an accelerated social work degree offers a fast-track route into meaningful roles within communities and healthcare settings. For those interested in understanding human behavior, an online accelerated psychology degree could prepare you for jobs in counseling, education, or mental health.

Many aspiring counselors look for accredited and affordable programs. If quality matters to you, explore cacrep schools to find online counseling degrees that meet rigorous industry standards. Additionally, if you want to specialize in relationship or family therapy, consider programs that lead to a marriage and family therapy certification online for professional flexibility and advancement.

Whether your interests lie in policy, mental health, or advocacy, online graduate programs provide flexible options to launch or advance your career in the social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Emily C. Williams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles