World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
50
Citations
9843
World Ranking
2773
National Ranking
1343

Emily C. Williams publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emily C. Williams sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 217 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Emily C. Williams D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emily C. Williams sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Emily C. Williams is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States and has a significant body of research in the field of Medicine. Their work spans multiple subfields, including Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Infectious Diseases, and Clinical Psychology.

Williams's research focuses on several main topics, such as Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes, Opioid Use Disorder Treatment, HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk, HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions, Health Policy Implementation Science, Homelessness and Social Issues, and Primary Care and Health Outcomes.

Their recent notable papers include:

  • The impact of methamphetamine/amphetamine use on receipt and outcomes of medications for opioid use disorder: a systematic review (2021, Addiction Science & Clinical Practice)
  • Community engagement and clinical trial diversity: Navigating barriers and co-designing solutions-A report from the "Health Equity through Diversity" seminar series (2023, PLoS ONE)
  • Racial/ethnic discrimination and alcohol use disorder severity among United States adults (2020, Drug and Alcohol Dependence)
  • Comparison of Substance Use Disorder Diagnosis Rates From Electronic Health Record Data With Substance Use Disorder Prevalence Rates Reported in Surveys Across Sociodemographic Groups in the Veterans Health Administration (2022, JAMA Network Open)
  • Integrating Alcohol-Related Prevention and Treatment Into Primary Care (2023, JAMA Internal Medicine)

Williams frequently publishes in venues such as Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, AIDS and Behavior, Journal of Addiction Medicine, and Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment.

Collaborations with other researchers are prominent in Williams's work. Frequent co-authors include Madeline C. Frost, Elizabeth J. Austin, E. Jennifer Edelman, Jessica Chen, and Eric J. Hawkins.

Best Publications

  • AUDIT-C as a Brief Screen for Alcohol Misuse in Primary Care

    Katharine A. Bradley;Anna F. DeBenedetti;Robert J. Volk;Emily C. Williams

  • Effectiveness of the AUDIT-C as a Screening Test for Alcohol Misuse in Three Race/Ethnic Groups

    Danielle Frank;Anna F. DeBenedetti;Robert J. Volk;Emily C. Williams

  • Alcohol Use and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infection: Current Knowledge, Implications, and Future Directions.

    Emily C. Williams;Emily C. Williams;Judith A. Hahn;Richard Saitz;Kendall Bryant

  • Implementation of evidence-based alcohol screening in the Veterans Health Administration.

    Katharine A Bradley;Emily C Williams;Carol E Achtmeyer;Bryan Volpp

  • AUDIT-C Scores as a Scaled Marker of Mean Daily Drinking, Alcohol Use Disorder Severity, and Probability of Alcohol Dependence in a U.S. General Population Sample of Drinkers

    Anna D. Rubinsky;Deborah A. Dawson;Emily C. Williams;Emily C. Williams;Daniel R. Kivlahan;Daniel R. Kivlahan

  • Risk of mortality and physiologic injury evident with lower alcohol exposure among HIV infected compared with uninfected men

    Amy C. Justice;Kathleen A. McGinnis;Janet P. Tate;R. Scott Braithwaite

  • Strategies to implement alcohol screening and brief intervention in primary care settings: a structured literature review.

    Emily C. Williams;M. Laura Johnson;Gwen T. Lapham;Ryan M. Caldeiro

  • Alcohol Screening Scores and Medication Nonadherence

    Chris L. Bryson;David H. Au;Haili Sun;Emily C. Williams

  • Quality concerns with routine alcohol screening in VA clinical settings

    Katharine A. Bradley;Gwen T. Lapham;Gwen T. Lapham;Eric J. Hawkins;Eric J. Hawkins;Carol E. Achtmeyer

  • How primary care providers talk to patients about alcohol: a qualitative study.

    Kinsey A. McCormick;Nancy E. Cochran;Anthony L. Back;Joseph O. Merrill;Joseph O. Merrill

  • Increased documented brief alcohol interventions with a performance measure and electronic decision support.

    Gwen T. Lapham;Carol E. Achtmeyer;Emily C. Williams;Eric J. Hawkins

  • Adverse Childhood Experiences, Military Service, and Adult Health

    Jodie G. Katon;Jodie G. Katon;Jodie G. Katon;Keren Lehavot;Keren Lehavot;Tracy L. Simpson;Tracy L. Simpson;Emily C. Williams;Emily C. Williams

  • How primary care providers talk to patients about alcohol

    Kinsey A. McCormick;Nancy E. Cochran;Anthony L. Back;Joseph O. Merrill

  • Readiness to Change in Primary Care Patients Who Screened Positive for Alcohol Misuse

    Emily C. Williams;Daniel R. Kivlahan;Richard Saitz;Joseph O. Merrill

  • Level of Alcohol Use Associated with HIV Care Continuum Targets in a National U.S. Sample of Persons Living with HIV Receiving Healthcare

    Emily C Williams;Emily C Williams;Kathleen A McGinnis;E Jennifer Edelman;Theresa E Matson;Theresa E Matson

  • Factors Underlying Quality Problems with Alcohol Screening Prompted by a Clinical Reminder in Primary Care: A Multi-site Qualitative Study

    Emily C. Williams;Emily C. Williams;Carol E. Achtmeyer;Rachel M. Thomas;Joel R. Grossbard

  • Do Brief Measures of Readiness to Change Predict Alcohol Consumption and Consequences in Primary Care Patients With Unhealthy Alcohol Use

    Emily C. Williams;Nicholas J. Horton;Jeffrey H. Samet;Richard Saitz

  • Barriers to and Facilitators of Alcohol Use Disorder Pharmacotherapy in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study in Five VA Clinics

    Emily C. Williams;Emily C. Williams;Carol E. Achtmeyer;Jessica P. Young;Douglas Berger;Douglas Berger

  • An early evaluation of implementation of brief intervention for unhealthy alcohol use in the US Veterans Health Administration.

    Emily C. Williams;Anna D. Rubinsky;Laura J. Chavez;Laura J. Chavez;Gwen T. Lapham;Gwen T. Lapham

  • Racial/ethnic workplace discrimination: association with tobacco and alcohol use.

    Laura J. Chavez;Laura J. Chavez;India J. Ornelas;Courtney R. Lyles;Emily C. Williams;Emily C. Williams

Frequent Co-Authors

Katharine A. Bradley
Katharine A. Bradley University of Washington
Daniel R. Kivlahan
Daniel R. Kivlahan University of Washington
Amy C. Justice
Amy C. Justice Yale University
Derek D. Satre
Derek D. Satre University of California, San Francisco
Keren Lehavot
Keren Lehavot University of Washington
David A. Fiellin
David A. Fiellin Yale University
Evette J. Ludman
Evette J. Ludman Kaiser Permanente
Tracy L. Simpson
Tracy L. Simpson University of Washington
Alex H. S. Harris
Alex H. S. Harris Stanford University
Brandon D. L. Marshall
Brandon D. L. Marshall Brown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens the door to a diverse range of rewarding online degree programs and career paths. If you want to make a significant impact quickly, an accelerated social work degree offers a fast-track route into meaningful roles within communities and healthcare settings. For those interested in understanding human behavior, an online accelerated psychology degree could prepare you for jobs in counseling, education, or mental health.

Many aspiring counselors look for accredited and affordable programs. If quality matters to you, explore cacrep schools to find online counseling degrees that meet rigorous industry standards. Additionally, if you want to specialize in relationship or family therapy, consider programs that lead to a marriage and family therapy certification online for professional flexibility and advancement.

Whether your interests lie in policy, mental health, or advocacy, online graduate programs provide flexible options to launch or advance your career in the social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Emily C. Williams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles