World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 40 5444 2562 130 4607

Russel S. Falck publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Russel S. Falck between 1978 and 2014, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Russel S. Falck published across 37 years, from 1978 to 2014, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2005. 7 of the 131 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2014. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2005. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 4 publications
1978 2014

131 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Russel S. Falck: publications per year, 1978 to 2014
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 1
1981 1
1982 0
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 1
1987 0
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 2
1992 4
1993 2
1994 6
1995 9
1996 2
1997 1
1998 3
1999 5
2000 6
2001 6
2002 3
2003 4
2004 5
2005 11
2006 11
2007 7
2008 6
2009 5
2010 6
2011 7
2012 7
2013 3
2014 4
Total 131
Download as CSV

Russel S. Falck publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Russel S. Falck sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 124–133 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 130 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453 130
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Russel S. Falck D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Russel S. Falck sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297 40
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Russel S. Falck is affiliated with Wright State University in the United States. Their academic and research activity is associated with this institution, which serves as their primary professional base.

There are no recorded recent papers, book publications, or awards listed for Russel S. Falck. Likewise, there is no available data on frequent co-authors, publication venues, fields of study, subfields, or specific research topics linked to their work.

As a result, the profile focuses primarily on the affiliation information without additional bibliometric or thematic details due to lack of available data.

Best Publications

  • Respondent-driven sampling to recruit MDMA users: a methodological assessment.

    Jichuan Wang;Robert G. Carlson;Russel S. Falck;Harvey A. Siegal

  • An Ethnographic Approach to Targeted Sampling: Problems and Solutions in AIDS Prevention Research among Injection Drug and Crack-Cocaine Users

    Robert G. Carlson;Jichuan Wang;Harvey A. Siegal;Russel S. Falck

  • PREDOSE: A Semantic Web Platform for Drug Abuse Epidemiology using Social Media

    Delroy H. Cameron;Gary Alan Smith;Raminta Daniulaityte;Amit P. Sheth

  • “I just wanted to tell you that loperamide WILL WORK”: A Web-Based Study of Extra-Medical Use of Loperamide

    Raminta Daniulaityte;Robert G. Carlson;Russel S. Falck;Delroy H. Cameron

  • The prevalence of psychiatric disorder among a community sample of crack cocaine users: an exploratory study with practical implications.

    Russel S. Falck;Jichuan Wang;Harvey A. Siegal;Robert G. Carlson

  • Respondent-Driven Sampling in the Recruitment of Illicit Stimulant Drug Users in a Rural Setting: Findings and Technical Issues

    Jichuan Wang;Russel S. Falck;Linna Li;Ahmmed Rahman

  • Correlates of Rural Methamphetamine and Cocaine Users: Results From a Multistate Community Study

    Brenda M. Booth;Carl G. Leukefeld;Russel S. Falck;Jichuan Wang

  • Drug use practices among MDMA/ecstasy users in Ohio : a latent class analysis

    Robert G. Carlson;Jichuan Wang;Russel S. Falck;Harvey A. Siegal

  • Factorial Structure of Rosenberg's Self-Esteem Scale Among Crack-Cocaine Drug Users

    Jichuan Wang;Harvey A. Siegal;Russell S. Falck;Robert G. Carlson

  • Examining factorial structure and measurement invariance of the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI)-18 among drug users.

    Jichuan Wang;Brian C. Kelly;Brenda M. Booth;Russel S. Falck

  • The Validity of Injection Drug Users Self-Reported Use of Opiates and Cocaine

    Russel S. Falck;Harvey A. Siegal;Mary Ann Forney;Jichuan Wang

  • Popping and snorting volatile nitrites: a current fad for getting high.

    L. T. Sigell;F. T. Kapp;G. A. Fusaro;E. D. Nelson

  • The prevalence and correlates of depressive symptomatology among a community sample of crack-cocaine smokers.

    Russel S. Falck;Jichuan Wang;Robert G. Carlson;Mark Eddy

  • CRACKING THE CORNFIELDS: Recruiting Illicit Stimulant Drug Users in Rural Ohio

    Paul J. Draus;Harvey A. Siegal;Robert G. Carlson;Russel S. Falck

  • “I’m not afraid of those ones just ‘cause they’ve been prescribed”: Perceptions of risk among illicit users of pharmaceutical opioids

    Raminta Daniulaityte;Russel S. Falck;Robert G. Carlson

  • Usefulness of the health belief model in predicting HIV needle risk practices among injection drug users.

    Russel S. Falck;Harvey A. Siegal;Jichuan Wang;Robert G. Carlson

  • Predictors of drug abuse treatment entry among crack-cocaine smokers

    Harvey A Siegal;Russel S Falck;Jichuan Wang;Robert G Carlson

  • Rural Drug Users: Factors Associated With Substance Abuse Treatment Utilization

    Carrie B. Oser;Carl G. Leukefeld;Michele Staton Tindall;Thomas F. Garrity

  • Longitudinal relationship between psychological distress and multiple substance use: results from a three-year multisite natural-history study of rural stimulant users.

    Brenda M. Booth;Geoffrey Curran;Xiaotong Han;Patricia B. Wright

  • HIV infection and risk behaviors among intravenous drug users in low seroprevalence areas in the Midwest.

    H A Siegal;R G Carlson;R Falck;L Li

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert G. Carlson
Robert G. Carlson Wright State University
Jichuan Wang
Jichuan Wang George Washington University
Harvey A. Siegal
Harvey A. Siegal Wright State University
Brenda M. Booth
Brenda M. Booth University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Carl G. Leukefeld
Carl G. Leukefeld University of Kentucky
Amit P. Sheth
Amit P. Sheth University of South Carolina
Lu Chen
Lu Chen Stanford University
Carrie B. Oser
Carrie B. Oser University of Kentucky
Linda B. Cottler
Linda B. Cottler University of Florida
William W. Stoops
William W. Stoops University of Kentucky

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and fulfilling career paths. Many students are looking for accessible, high-quality education, and the popularity of online programs is on the rise. Accreditation is an essential factor to consider, especially for counseling careers. For example, aspiring counselors should prioritize cacrep accredited programs, as these meet strict academic and ethical standards in the field.

If your interests lean towards relationship counseling, marriage and family therapy master's programs offer specialized skills to help families and couples thrive. Psychology remains one of the most popular majors, with many institutions now offering flexible and affordable options. Consider a cheapest online psychology degree to minimize costs while advancing your career.

For those passionate about social advocacy and helping communities, pursuing an msw degree (Master of Social Work) online can be a rewarding step. These programs are tailored for those seeking to make a positive impact through direct service and social change.

Best Scientists Citing Russel S. Falck