World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
36
Citations
4636
World Ranking
6530
National Ranking
3154

Harvey A. Siegal publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harvey A. Siegal sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 125 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Harvey A. Siegal D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harvey A. Siegal sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Harvey A. Siegal was affiliated with Wright State University in the United States. Their academic career involved research activities within this institution, contributing to the university's scientific community until their passing.

There is no record of recent papers published by Siegal, nor is there information about frequent co-authors or common publication venues associated with their work. This limits insight into collaborative networks or the typical academic forums in which they presented their research.

Similarly, there is no documented data about books published by Siegal, either as author or editor, so the scope of their contributions to academic literature in book form is not available.

Information regarding Siegal's main fields of study, subfields, and principal topics of research is not recorded. This absence of specific data leaves the precise focus areas of their scientific inquiry unclear.

No awards have been documented as part of Siegal's academic recognition during their career.

Best Publications

  • Efficacy of a brief case management intervention to link recently diagnosed HIV-infected persons to care.

    Lytt I. Gardner;Lisa R. Metsch;Pamela Anderson-Mahoney;Anita M. Loughlin

  • Respondent-driven sampling to recruit MDMA users: a methodological assessment.

    Jichuan Wang;Robert G. Carlson;Russel S. Falck;Harvey A. Siegal

  • An Ethnographic Approach to Targeted Sampling: Problems and Solutions in AIDS Prevention Research among Injection Drug and Crack-Cocaine Users

    Robert G. Carlson;Jichuan Wang;Harvey A. Siegal;Russel S. Falck

  • The crack life: an ethnographic overview of crack use and sexual behavior among African-Americans in a midwest metropolitan city.

    Robert G. Carlson;Harvey A. Siegal

  • Enhancing Substance Abuse Treatment with Case Management: Its Impact on Employment

    Harvey A. Siegal;James H. Fisher;James H. Fisher;Richard C. Rapp;Richard C. Rapp;Casey W. Kelliher;Casey W. Kelliher

  • The prevalence of psychiatric disorder among a community sample of crack cocaine users: an exploratory study with practical implications.

    Russel S. Falck;Jichuan Wang;Harvey A. Siegal;Robert G. Carlson

  • Probable Relationship Between Opioid Abuse and Heroin Use

    Harvey A. Siegal;Robert G. Carlson;Deric R. Kenne;Maria G. Swora

  • Drug use practices among MDMA/ecstasy users in Ohio : a latent class analysis

    Robert G. Carlson;Jichuan Wang;Russel S. Falck;Harvey A. Siegal

  • Factorial Structure of Rosenberg's Self-Esteem Scale Among Crack-Cocaine Drug Users

    Jichuan Wang;Harvey A. Siegal;Russell S. Falck;Robert G. Carlson

  • The Strengths Perspective of Case Management: A Promising Inpatient Substance Abuse Treatment Enhancement

    Harvey A. Siegal;Richard C. Rapp;Casey W. Kelliher;James H. Fisher

  • The Validity of Injection Drug Users Self-Reported Use of Opiates and Cocaine

    Russel S. Falck;Harvey A. Siegal;Mary Ann Forney;Jichuan Wang

  • The prevalence and correlates of depressive symptomatology among a community sample of crack-cocaine smokers.

    Russel S. Falck;Jichuan Wang;Robert G. Carlson;Mark Eddy

  • CRACKING THE CORNFIELDS: Recruiting Illicit Stimulant Drug Users in Rural Ohio

    Paul J. Draus;Harvey A. Siegal;Robert G. Carlson;Russel S. Falck

  • Usefulness of the health belief model in predicting HIV needle risk practices among injection drug users.

    Russel S. Falck;Harvey A. Siegal;Jichuan Wang;Robert G. Carlson

  • Case management as a therapeutic enhancement: impact on post-treatment criminality.

    Harvey A Siegal;Li Li;Richard C Rapp

  • Predictors of drug abuse treatment entry among crack-cocaine smokers

    Harvey A Siegal;Russel S Falck;Jichuan Wang;Robert G Carlson

  • The Role of Case Management in Retaining Clients in Substance Abuse Treatment: An Exploratory Analysis

    Harvey A. Siegal;Richard C. Rapp;Li Li;Pranjit Saha

  • Abstinence trajectories among treated crack cocaine users.

    Harvey A Siegal;Li Li;Richard C Rapp

  • Risk and prevalence of treatable sexually transmitted diseases at a Birmingham substance abuse treatment facility.

    Laura H. Bachmann;Ivey Lewis;Ruthie Allen;Jane R. Schwebke

  • HIV infection and risk behaviors among intravenous drug users in low seroprevalence areas in the Midwest.

    H A Siegal;R G Carlson;R Falck;L Li

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert G. Carlson
Robert G. Carlson Wright State University
Russel S. Falck
Russel S. Falck Wright State University
Jichuan Wang
Jichuan Wang George Washington University
Li Li
Li Li Monash University
James A. Inciardi
James A. Inciardi University of Delaware
Edward W. Hook
Edward W. Hook University of Alabama at Birmingham
Mark L. Williams
Mark L. Williams Florida International University
Jane R. Schwebke
Jane R. Schwebke University of Alabama at Birmingham
Linda B. Cottler
Linda B. Cottler University of Florida
Carl G. Leukefeld
Carl G. Leukefeld University of Kentucky

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The demand for flexible, career-focused education in Social Sciences and Humanities has made online degrees more accessible than ever. Many students now choose accelerated or affordable programs to launch meaningful careers quickly, while studying at their own pace.

For aspiring social workers, 1 year msw programs online allow you to gain a Master’s in Social Work in a short time, preparing you for licensure and clinical roles. If you’re interested in human behavior and mental health, a fast track bachelor degree in psychology gives you a head start toward roles in counseling, research, or further study.

Accreditation is another key consideration. Selecting a program from cacrep accredited universities ensures your counseling degree meets rigorous standards for professional practice. Similarly, for those wishing to support couples and families, choosing marriage and family therapy online programs accredited by recognized agencies will help with career advancement and licensure.

Whether your goal is to help individuals, families, or communities, exploring these accredited online pathways offers a streamlined way to advance your education and career in the social sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Harvey A. Siegal

Recently Published Articles