World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 56 2866 2741 871 794 398 10473

Gintaras V. Reklaitis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gintaras V. Reklaitis between 1972 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gintaras V. Reklaitis published across 54 years, from 1972 to 2025, averaging 7.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 1997. 15 of the 425 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 1997. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 2 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 5 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 6 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 7 publications 1984: 6 publications 1985: 6 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 4 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 9 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 13 publications 1997: 31 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 8 publications
1972 2025

425 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gintaras V. Reklaitis: publications per year, 1972 to 2025
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 0
1974 2
1975 2
1976 1
1977 5
1978 2
1979 6
1980 3
1981 2
1982 3
1983 7
1984 6
1985 6
1986 1
1987 4
1988 0
1989 9
1990 2
1991 2
1992 3
1993 6
1994 7
1995 9
1996 13
1997 31
1998 4
1999 5
2000 9
2001 7
2002 3
2003 6
2004 8
2005 9
2006 13
2007 19
2008 7
2009 11
2010 16
2011 15
2012 11
2013 8
2014 11
2015 15
2016 13
2017 12
2018 15
2019 13
2020 12
2021 8
2022 11
2023 16
2024 7
2025 8
Total 425
Download as CSV

Gintaras V. Reklaitis publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gintaras V. Reklaitis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 398–407 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 398 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82 398
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Gintaras V. Reklaitis D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gintaras V. Reklaitis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170 56
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2007 - Member of the National Academy of Engineering For developing the theory and application of batch design, scheduling, and optimization tools, and for outstanding contributions to education.

Overview

Gintaras V. Reklaitis is affiliated with Purdue University West Lafayette in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on engineering, with a significant number of publications in the field. The subfields they are involved in include Control and Systems Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, and Molecular Biology.

Their work covers a range of topics such as Fault Detection and Control Systems, Process Optimization and Integration, Advanced Control Systems Optimization, Mineral Processing and Grinding, Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation, Crystallization and Solubility Studies, and Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring.

Gintaras V. Reklaitis has published multiple papers in notable venues, including:

  • Design of condition-based maintenance framework for process operations management in pharmaceutical continuous manufacturing, 2020, International Journal of Pharmaceutics
  • PharmaPy: An object-oriented tool for the development of hybrid pharmaceutical flowsheets, 2021, Computers & Chemical Engineering
  • Evaluation of a Combined MHE-NMPC Approach to Handle Plant-Model Mismatch in a Rotary Tablet Press, 2021, Processes
  • Modeling of a spray-drying process for the encapsulation of high-added value extracts from food by-products, 2022, Computers & Chemical Engineering
  • Real-Time Monitoring of Powder Mass Flowrates for Plant-Wide Control of a Continuous Direct Compaction Tablet Manufacturing Process, 2021, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

They have frequently collaborated with several researchers, including:

  • Zoltán K. Nagy
  • Flavio Manenti
  • Marcial Gonzalez
  • Daniel Casas-Orozco
  • Daniel J. Laky

The major publication venues where this scientist's work has appeared are:

  • International Journal of Pharmaceutics
  • Systems and Control Transactions
  • Computers & Chemical Engineering
  • Computer-aided chemical engineering/Computer aided chemical engineering
  • AIChE Journal

Gintaras V. Reklaitis has been recognized with several awards, including election as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2020. They were also elected a Member of the National Academy of Engineering in 2007 for contributions to batch design, scheduling, and optimization tools, alongside outstanding contributions to education.

Best Publications

  • A simulation based optimization approach to supply chain management under demand uncertainty

    June Young Jung;Gary E. Blau;Joseph F. Pekny;Gintaras V. Reklaitis

  • Enterprise-wide modeling & optimization—An overview of emerging research challenges and opportunities

    Vishal A. Varma;Gintaras V. Reklaitis;Gary E. Blau;Joseph F. Pekny

  • Process systems engineering: From Solvay to modern bio- and nanotechnology.: A history of development, successes and prospects for the future

    George Stephanopoulos;Gintaras V. Reklaitis

  • Process systems engineering – The generation next?

    Efstratios N. Pistikopoulos;Ana Barbosa-Póvoa;Jay H. Lee;Ruth Misener

  • Decomposition techniques for the solution of large-scale scheduling problems

    Matthew H. Bassett;Joseph F. Pekny;Gintaras V. Reklaitis

  • DESIGN OF BATCH CHEMICAL PLANTS UNDER MARKET UNCERTAINTY

    Sriram Subrahmanyam;Joseph F. Pekny;Gintaras V. Reklaitis

  • Risk and uncertainty in managing chemical manufacturing supply chains

    G.E. Applequist;J.F. Pekny;G.V. Reklaitis

  • A perspective on Quality-by-Control (QbC) in pharmaceutical continuous manufacturing

    Qinglin Su;Sudarshan Ganesh;Mariana Moreno;Yasasvi Bommireddy

  • Simulation-based optimization with surrogate models—Application to supply chain management

    Xiaotao Wan;Joseph F. Pekny;Gintaras V. Reklaitis

  • Perspectives on the continuous manufacturing of powder‐based pharmaceutical processes

    Marianthi Ierapetritou;Fernando Muzzio;Gintaras Reklaitis

  • Overview of Scheduling and Planning of Batch Process Operations

    G. V. Reklaitis

  • An optimization framework for the integrated planning of generation and transmission expansion in interconnected power systems

    Omar J. Guerra;Diego A. Tejada;Gintaras V. Reklaitis

  • Continuous Time Representation Approach to Batch and Continuous Process Scheduling. 1. MINLP Formulation

    L. Mockus;G. V. Reklaitis

  • Challenges and opportunities in enterprise-wide optimization in the pharmaceutical industry

    José Miguel Laínez;E. Schaefer;Gintaras V. Reklaitis

  • Ontological informatics infrastructure for pharmaceutical product development and manufacturing

    Venkat Venkatasubramanian;Chunhua Zhao;Girish S. Joglekar;Ankur Jain

  • Mathematical programming formulation for scheduling of batch operations based on nonuniform time discretization

    L. Mockus;G.V. Reklaitis

  • A simulation‐optimization framework for research and development pipeline management

    Dharmashankar Subramanian;Joseph F. Pekny;Gintaras V. Reklaitis

  • Simulation-optimization framework for stochastic optimization of R&D pipeline management

    Dharmashankar Subramanian;Joseph F. Pekny;Gintaras V. Reklaitis;Gary E. Blau

  • Optimal design of batch/semicontinuous processes

    F. Carl Knopf;Martin R. Okos;Gintaras V. Reklaitis

  • An optimization framework for the integration of water management and shale gas supply chain design

    Omar J. Guerra;Andrés J. Calderón;Lazaros G. Papageorgiou;Jeffrey J. Siirola

  • Reactive schedule modification in multipurpose batch chemical plants

    Kishore B. Kanakamedala;Gintaras V. Reklaitis;Venkat Venkatasubramanian

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph F. Pekny
Joseph F. Pekny Purdue University West Lafayette
Zoltan K. Nagy
Zoltan K. Nagy Purdue University West Lafayette
Audris Mockus
Audris Mockus University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Bri-Mathias Hodge
Bri-Mathias Hodge University of Colorado Boulder
Venkat Venkatasubramanian
Venkat Venkatasubramanian Columbia University
Flavio Manenti
Flavio Manenti Polytechnic University of Milan
Lazaros G. Papageorgiou
Lazaros G. Papageorgiou University College London
Ali Elkamel
Ali Elkamel University of Waterloo
Iftekhar A. Karimi
Iftekhar A. Karimi National University of Singapore
Luis Puigjaner
Luis Puigjaner Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you consider studying Engineering and Technology in the USA, exploring related online degrees can further broaden your career prospects. Many professionals are now choosing flexible online learning pathways to gain additional skills in areas that complement technical expertise.

For example, obtaining a master degree in human resources can help engineers transition into team leadership or HR management roles within technology firms. Those interested in high-impact communication might pursue the cheapest online communications degree to hone skills that are vital in technical sales, corporate training, and project management.

Looking to start your own business or manage engineering projects innovatively? The best mba for entrepreneurship combines technical knowledge with business acumen. Even better, if you wish to save on application stress and expenses, consider the cheapest online mba no gmat requirement—making advanced business education more accessible for busy professionals.

Blending engineering with degrees in business, communications, or HR opens up diverse and rewarding career pathways in tech-driven industries.

Best Scientists Citing Gintaras V. Reklaitis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles