World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 39 5546 2627 61 9554

Michael W. Arthur publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael W. Arthur between 1988 and 2015, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael W. Arthur published across 28 years, from 1988 to 2015, averaging 2.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2007. 4 of the 61 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2015. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2007. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 3 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 3 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 2 publications
1988 2015

61 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael W. Arthur: publications per year, 1988 to 2015
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 1
1990 0
1991 1
1992 3
1993 1
1994 0
1995 2
1996 2
1997 1
1998 1
1999 1
2000 1
2001 0
2002 3
2003 2
2004 4
2005 3
2006 3
2007 8
2008 7
2009 3
2010 1
2011 3
2012 3
2013 2
2014 2
2015 2
Total 61
Download as CSV

Michael W. Arthur publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael W. Arthur sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 54–63 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 61 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael W. Arthur D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael W. Arthur sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300 39
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael W. Arthur was affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States during their academic career.

The available information does not include specific details on their research papers, co-authors, publication venues, or fields of study. Likewise, there are no records of book publications or awards associated with Michael W. Arthur.

Due to the absence of detailed data on their publications or research topics, it is not possible to provide a summary of their scientific contributions or thematic focuses.

Their academic presence, as recorded, indicates no publicly listed recent papers, frequent collaborators, or recurrent publication outlets.

Michael W. Arthur is deceased. The documentation focuses on basic affiliation without extending into finer aspects of their research legacy.

Best Publications

  • Measuring risk and protective factors for substance use, delinquency, and other adolescent problem behaviors. The Communities That Care Youth Survey.

    Michael W. Arthur;J. David Hawkins;John A. Pollard;Richard F. Catalano

  • Promoting science-based prevention in communities

    J.David Hawkins;Richard F Catalano;Michael W Arthur

  • Risk and protection: Are both necessary to understand diverse behavioral outcomes in adolescence?

    John A. Pollard;J. David Hawkins;Michael W. Arthur

  • Prevention science and positive youth development: competitive or cooperative frameworks?

    Richard F Catalano;J.David Hawkins;M.Lisa Berglund;John A Pollard

  • A cross-national comparison of risk and protective factors for adolescent substance use: the United States and Australia.

    Jennifer M Beyers;John W Toumbourou;Richard F Catalano;Michael W Arthur

  • Results of a Type 2 Translational Research Trial to Prevent Adolescent Drug Use and Delinquency: A Test of Communities That Care

    J. David Hawkins;Sabrina Oesterle;Eric C. Brown;Michael W. Arthur

  • Early effects of Communities That Care on targeted risks and initiation of delinquent behavior and substance use.

    J. David Hawkins;Eric C. Brown;Sabrina Oesterle;Michael W. Arthur

  • Measurement Properties of the Communities That Care® Youth Survey Across Demographic Groups

    Renita R. Glaser;M. Lee Van. Horn;Michael W. Arthur;J. David. Hawkins

  • Comprehensive community- and school-based interventions to prevent antisocial behavior.

    Richard F. Catalano;Michael W. Arthur;David J. Hawkins;Lisa Berglund

  • Testing Communities That Care: The Rationale, Design and Behavioral Baseline Equivalence of the Community Youth Development Study

    J. David Hawkins;Richard F. Catalano;Michael W. Arthur;Elizabeth Egan

  • Gender similarities and differences in the association between risk and protective factors and self-reported serious delinquency.

    Abigail A. Fagan;M. Lee Van Horn;J. David Hawkins;Michael W. Arthur

  • Measuring Risk and Protection in Communities Using the Communities that Care Youth Survey.

    Michael W. Arthur;John S. Briney;J. David Hawkins;Robert D. Abbott

  • Preventing Substance Abuse

    J. David Hawkins;Michael W. Arthur;Richard F. Catalano

  • Bridging science to practice: achieving prevention program implementation fidelity in the community youth development study.

    Abigail A. Fagan;Koren Hanson;J. David Hawkins;Michael W. Arthur

  • Sustained Decreases in Risk Exposure and Youth Problem Behaviors After Installation of the Communities That Care Prevention System in a Randomized Trial

    J. David Hawkins;Sabrina Oesterle;Eric C. Brown;Kathryn C. Monahan;Kathryn C. Monahan

  • The prevention and treatment of juvenile delinquency: A review of the research

    Edward P. Mulvey;Michael W. Arthur;N.Dickon Reppucci

  • Community variation in risk and protective factors and substance use outcomes.

    J. David Hawkins;M. Lee Van Horn;Michael W. Arthur

  • A review of school drug policies and their impact on youth substance use.

    Tracy Evans-Whipp;Jennifer M. Beyers;Sian Lloyd;Andrea N. Lafazia

  • Bridging the gap between science and practice in drug abuse prevention through needs assessment and strategic community planning

    Michael W. Arthur;Caryn Blitz

  • Risk and protective factors in the development of delinquency and conduct disorder

    M Arthur;Richard Van Dorn;Charles Ayers;James Williams

Frequent Co-Authors

J. David Hawkins
J. David Hawkins University of Washington
Richard F. Catalano
Richard F. Catalano University of Washington
Robert D. Abbott
Robert D. Abbott University of Washington
Abigail A. Fagan
Abigail A. Fagan University of Florida
Kathryn C. Monahan
Kathryn C. Monahan University of Pittsburgh
John W. Toumbourou
John W. Toumbourou Deakin University
Lyndal Bond
Lyndal Bond Victoria University
Tracy W. Harachi
Tracy W. Harachi University of Washington
David M. Murray
David M. Murray National Institutes of Health
Jeffrey J. Olson
Jeffrey J. Olson Emory University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens the door to numerous online degree programs tailored for today’s diverse learners. For those seeking to fast-track their qualifications in social work, enrolling in an accelerated msw program online can help you obtain an advanced degree more quickly, allowing graduates to start making a difference sooner.

Psychology is another popular field, and students interested in flexible, fast-paced options should consider accelerated psychology programs online. These programs are ideal for self-motivated learners aiming for roles in counseling, research, or human services.

If your goal is to become a professional counselor, it’s important to look for cacrep accredited online counseling programs. Accreditation ensures that your education meets industry standards and improves your employment prospects after graduation.

Those interested in supporting families and relationships can pursue a marriage and family therapist degree from a reputable online program. These degrees prepare graduates to guide individuals and couples through life’s challenges, offering meaningful and impactful career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Michael W. Arthur

Recently Published Articles