World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
52
Citations
9478
World Ranking
5343
National Ranking
2381

Paul Albert Fuchs publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Albert Fuchs sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 118 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Paul Albert Fuchs D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Albert Fuchs sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul Albert Fuchs is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience and the biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology underlying auditory systems.

Their work concentrates on sensory systems with a strong emphasis on hearing, cochlea function, tinnitus, and genetics. They contribute significantly to subfields such as molecular biology, cognitive neuroscience, speech and hearing, and nutrition and dietetics. The main topics in their research include:

  • Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Noise Effects and Management
  • Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Ion channel regulation and function
  • Vestibular and auditory disorders

Fuchs has published extensively in multiple journals, with frequent contributions to Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, and the Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology. Notable recent papers include:

  • Preventing presbycusis in mice with enhanced medial olivocochlear feedback (2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • Acoustic Trauma Increases Ribbon Number and Size in Outer Hair Cells of the Mouse Cochlea (2020, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology)
  • Prior Acoustic Trauma Alters Type II Afferent Activity in the Mouse Cochlea (2021, eNeuro)
  • Cy3-RgIA-5727 Labels and Inhibits α9-Containing nAChRs of Cochlear Hair Cells (2021, Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience)
  • Characterization of HA-tagged α9 and α10 nAChRs in the mouse cochlea (2020, Scientific Reports)

Their frequent collaborators include Megan Beers Wood, Ana Belén Elgoyhen, Luis E. Boero, Valeria C. Castagna, and María Eugenia Gómez-Casati, with multiple joint publications.

Best Publications

  • Transmitter release at the hair cell ribbon synapse.

    Elisabeth Glowatzki;Paul A. Fuchs

  • Mechanisms of hair cell tuning.

    R. Fettiplace;P. A. Fuchs

  • Cholinergic synaptic inhibition of inner hair cells in the neonatal mammalian cochlea.

    Elisabeth Glowatzki;Paul A. Fuchs

  • Cholinergic inhibition of short (outer) hair cells of the chick's cochlea

    PA Fuchs;BW Murrow

  • The diverse roles of ribbon synapses in sensory neurotransmission

    Gary Matthews;Paul Fuchs

  • A molecular mechanism for electrical tuning of cochlear hair cells

    Krishnan Ramanathan;Timothy H. Michael;Guo Jian Jiang;Hakim Hiel

  • Switching of Ca2+-Dependent Inactivation of CaV1.3 Channels by Calcium Binding Proteins of Auditory Hair Cells

    Philemon S. Yang;Badr A. Alseikhan;Hakim Hiel;Lisa Grant

  • Potassium currents in hair cells isolated from the cochlea of the chick.

    Unknown

  • Time and intensity coding at the hair cell's ribbon synapse.

    Paul Albert Fuchs

  • The afferent synapse of cochlear hair cells.

    Paul A Fuchs;Elisabeth Glowatzki;Tobias Moser

  • Synaptic hyperpolarization and inhibition of turtle cochlear hair cells.

    J J Art;R Fettiplace;P A Fuchs

  • Developmental Regulation of Nicotinic Synapses on Cochlear Inner Hair Cells

    Eleonora Katz;Ana Belén Elgoyhen;María E. Gómez-Casati;Marlies Knipper

  • The postsynaptic function of type II cochlear afferents

    Catherine Weisz;Elisabeth Glowatzki;Paul Fuchs

  • Release sites and calcium channels in hair cells of the chick's cochlea.

    C. Martinez-Dunst;R. L. Michaels;P. A. Fuchs

  • A “Synaptoplasmic Cistern” Mediates Rapid Inhibition of Cochlear Hair Cells

    Maria Lioudyno;Hakim Hiel;Jee Hyun Kong;Eleonora Katz

  • Synaptic transmission at vertebrate hair cells

    Paul A Fuchs

  • Unmyelinated type II afferent neurons report cochlear damage

    Chang Liu;Elisabeth Glowatzki;Paul Albert Fuchs

  • Membrane properties and selective connexions of identified leech neurones in culture

    Unknown

  • Molecular Cloning and Mapping of the Human Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor α10 (CHRNA10)

    Lawrence R. Lustig;Huashan Peng;Hakim Hiel;Takehito Yamamoto

  • A point mutation in the hair cell nicotinic cholinergic receptor prolongs cochlear inhibition and enhances noise protection.

    Julian Taranda;Stéphane F Maison;Jimena A Ballestero;Eleonora Katz

  • Facilitating efferent inhibition of inner hair cells in the cochlea of the neonatal rat.

    Juan Diego Goutman;Paul Albert Fuchs;Elisabeth Glowatzki

  • Efferent modulation of hair cell tuning in the cochlea of the turtle.

    J J Art;A C Crawford;R Fettiplace;P A Fuchs

Frequent Co-Authors

Elisabeth Glowatzki
Elisabeth Glowatzki Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Ana Belén Elgoyhen
Ana Belén Elgoyhen University of Buenos Aires
Stéphane F. Maison
Stéphane F. Maison Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Neil S. Millar
Neil S. Millar University College London
David T. Yue
David T. Yue Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
David K. Ryugo
David K. Ryugo Garvan Institute of Medical Research
M. Charles Liberman
M. Charles Liberman Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
J. Michael McIntosh
J. Michael McIntosh University of Utah
Robert Fettiplace
Robert Fettiplace University of Wisconsin–Madison
Marlies Knipper
Marlies Knipper University of Tübingen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Paul Albert Fuchs

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles