World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
39
Citations
5209
World Ranking
8381
National Ranking
714

Lukas Rüttiger publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lukas Rüttiger sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 111 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Lukas Rüttiger D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lukas Rüttiger sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lukas Rüttiger is affiliated with the University of Tübingen in Germany and focuses their research primarily in the field of Neuroscience. Their work encompasses various subfields including Sensory Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Molecular Biology, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

Their research topics cover a range of areas related to auditory function and disorders. Major topics include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, and Genetics, with additional concentration on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation, Vestibular and Auditory Disorders, Neural Dynamics and Brain Function, Noise Effects and Management, Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research, as well as Ion Channel Regulation and Function.

The scientist has contributed to multiple peer-reviewed publications, with recent papers including:

  • The Neural Bases of Tinnitus: Lessons from Deafness and Cochlear Implants (2020), Journal of Neuroscience
  • Age-related hearing loss pertaining to potassium ion channels in the cochlea and auditory pathway (2020), Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
  • Disturbed Balance of Inhibitory Signaling Links Hearing Loss and Cognition (2022), Frontiers in Neural Circuits
  • Functional biomarkers that distinguish between tinnitus with and without hyperacusis (2021), Clinical and Translational Medicine
  • MET currents and otoacoustic emissions from mice with a detached tectorial membrane indicate the extracellular matrix regulates Ca2+ near stereocilia (2021), The Journal of Physiology

Lukas Rüttiger frequently collaborates with several researchers, including Marlies Knipper, Wibke Singer, Stephan Wolpert, Matthias H. Munk, and Philine Marchetta. These collaborations reflect a broad network within auditory neuroscience and related fields.

The scientist's research has been published in a range of venues, with repeated contributions to journals such as Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie, Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, Frontiers in Neuroscience, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and the Journal of Neuroscience.

Best Publications

  • Advances in the neurobiology of hearing disorders: recent developments regarding the basis of tinnitus and hyperacusis

    Marlies Knipper;Pim Van Dijk;Isidro Nunes;Lukas Rüttiger

  • A splice site mutation in the murine Opa1 gene features pathology of autosomal dominant optic atrophy.

    Marcel V Alavi;Stefanie Bette;Simone Schimpf;Frank Schuettauf

  • Deletion of the Ca2+-activated potassium (BK) α-subunit but not the BKβ1-subunit leads to progressive hearing loss

    Lukas Rüttiger;Matthias Sausbier;Ulrike Zimmermann;Harald Winter

  • Nuclear Localization of Ataxin-3 Is Required for the Manifestation of Symptoms in SCA3: In Vivo Evidence

    Ulrike Bichelmeier;Thorsten Schmidt;Jeannette Hübener;Jana Boy

  • The Reduced Cochlear Output and the Failure to Adapt the Central Auditory Response Causes Tinnitus in Noise Exposed Rats

    Lukas Rüttiger;Wibke Singer;Rama Panford-Walsh;Masahiro Matsumoto

  • A behavioral paradigm to judge acute sodium salicylate-induced sound experience in rats: a new approach for an animal model on tinnitus.

    Lukas Rüttiger;Jürgen Ciuffani;Hans Peter Zenner;Marlies Knipper

  • Chromatic sensitivity of ganglion cells in the peripheral primate retina

    Paul R. Martin;Barry B. Lee;Andrew J. R. White;Samuel G. Solomon

  • Two classes of outer hair cells along the tonotopic axis of the cochlea.

    J Engel;C Braig;L Rüttiger;S Kuhn

  • Eps8 regulates hair bundle length and functional maturation of mammalian auditory hair cells.

    Valeria Zampini;Lukas Rüttiger;Stuart L. Johnson;Christoph Franz

  • Tinnitus behavior and hearing function correlate with the reciprocal expression patterns of BDNF and Arg3.1/arc in auditory neurons following acoustic trauma.

    J. Tan;L. Rüttiger;R. Panford-Walsh;W. Singer

  • Loss of auditory sensitivity from inner hair cell synaptopathy can be centrally compensated in the young but not old brain.

    Dorit Möhrle;Kun Ni;Ksenya Varakina;Dan Bing

  • Noise-Induced Inner Hair Cell Ribbon Loss Disturbs Central Arc Mobilization: A Novel Molecular Paradigm for Understanding Tinnitus

    Wibke Singer;Annalisa Zuccotti;Mirko Jaumann;Sze Chim Lee

  • Synaptotagmin IV determines the linear Ca2+ dependence of vesicle fusion at auditory ribbon synapses

    Stuart L Johnson;Christoph Franz;Stephanie Kuhn;Stephanie Kuhn;David N Furness

  • Chromatic Organization of Ganglion Cell Receptive Fields in the Peripheral Retina

    Samuel G. Solomon;Barry B. Lee;Andrew J. R. White;Lukas Rüttiger

  • cGMP-Prkg1 signaling and Pde5 inhibition shelter cochlear hair cells and hearing function

    Mirko Jaumann;Juliane Dettling;Martin Gubelt;Ulrike Zimmermann

  • Orientation sensitivity of ganglion cells in primate retina.

    Christopher L Passaglia;John B Troy;Lukas Rüttiger;Lukas Rüttiger;Barry B Lee;Barry B Lee

  • Lack of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Hampers Inner Hair Cell Synapse Physiology, But Protects against Noise-Induced Hearing Loss

    Annalisa Zuccotti;Stephanie Kuhn;Stuart L. Johnson;Christoph Franz

  • Processing of natural temporal stimuli by macaque retinal ganglion cells.

    J. H. van Hateren;L. Rüttiger;H. Sun;B. B. Lee;B. B. Lee

  • The Neural Bases of Tinnitus: Lessons from Deafness and Cochlear Implants.

    Marlies Knipper;Pim van Dijk;Pim van Dijk;Holger Schulze;Birgit Mazurek

  • Defective Gpsm2/Gαi3 signalling disrupts stereocilia development and growth cone actin dynamics in Chudley-McCullough syndrome.

    Stephanie A. Mauriac;Yeri E. Hien;Jonathan E. Bird;Steve Dos-Santos Carvalho

  • Deafness in LIMP2-deficient mice due to early loss of the potassium channel KCNQ1/KCNE1 in marginal cells of the stria vascularis

    Marlies Knipper;Cathrin Claussen;Lukas Rüttiger;Ulrike Zimmermann

  • Selective Color Constancy Deficits after Circumscribed Unilateral Brain Lesions

    Lukas Rüttiger;Doris I. Braun;Karl R. Gegenfurtner;Dirk Petersen

Frequent Co-Authors

Marlies Knipper
Marlies Knipper University of Tübingen
Peter Ruth
Peter Ruth University of Tübingen
Robert Feil
Robert Feil University of Tübingen
Walter Marcotti
Walter Marcotti University of Sheffield
Eckhard Friauf
Eckhard Friauf Technical University of Kaiserslautern
Christoph Braun
Christoph Braun University of Tübingen
Mireille Montcouquiol
Mireille Montcouquiol Inserm : Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale
Andrew Forge
Andrew Forge University College London
David N. Furness
David N. Furness Keele University
Bernd Wissinger
Bernd Wissinger University of Tübingen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens doors to various online degree and career options in health, psychology, and social services. Students seeking flexibility often pursue msw online programs for careers in counseling, therapy, or clinical social work. These programs are designed for those interested in mental health support and advocacy roles.

For those drawn to behavioral intervention, bcba masters programs prepare students to become Board Certified Behavior Analysts. This pathway suits individuals passionate about working with people with autism or developmental disorders.

Learners seeking a faster path to professional opportunities can benefit from online social work programs offering accelerated options. Similarly, a fast track psychology degree online equips graduates for roles in research, mental health, or organizational psychology.

Whether you are interested in clinical work, behavioral therapy, or psychological research, these online degrees provide flexible alternatives and expand your career pathways beyond neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing Lukas Rüttiger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles