World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Hideki Ohira

Hideki Ohira

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
7637
World Ranking
7861
National Ranking
20

Hideki Ohira publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hideki Ohira sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 251 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Hideki Ohira D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hideki Ohira sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hideki Ohira is affiliated with Nagoya University in Japan. They have actively contributed to research in the fields of neuroscience and psychology, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience and social psychology, as well as psychiatry and mental health. Their work also encompasses experimental and cognitive psychology, with particular interest in health-related topics.

The scientist's research covers various topics, including:

  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Aging and Gerontology Research
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Ohira has published extensively, with frequent appearances in these publication venues:

  • The Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
  • Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine

Their recent papers include:

  • "Effect of Indoor Forest Bathing on Reducing Feelings of Fatigue Using Cerebral Activity as an Indicator" (2022), International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "Reliability of Online Surveys in Investigating Perceptions and Impressions of Faces" (2021), Frontiers in Psychology
  • "Interoceptive accuracy correlates with precision of time perception in the millisecond range" (2022), Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • "The neural network basis of altered decision-making in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis" (2020), Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
  • "Predictive Processing of Interoception, Decision-Making, and Allostasis" (2020), Psihologijske teme

Regular collaborators in their work include the following co-authors:

  • Shigekazu Ukawa
  • Kenji Wakai
  • Akiko Tamakoshi
  • Takashi Kawamura
  • Masahiko Ando

Best Publications

  • Psychological effects of forest environments on healthy adults: Shinrin-yoku (forest-air bathing, walking) as a possible method of stress reduction.

    E. Morita;S. Fukuda;J. Nagano;N. Hamajima

  • L-Theanine reduces psychological and physiological stress responses

    Kenta Kimura;Makoto Ozeki;Lekh Raj Juneja;Hideki Ohira

  • Association of neural and physiological responses during voluntary emotion suppression

    Hideki Ohira;Michio Nomura;Naho Ichikawa;Tokiko Isowa;Tokiko Isowa

  • Effects of value and reward magnitude on feedback negativity and P300

    Atsushi Sato;Asako Yasuda;Hideki Ohira;Kaori Miyawaki

  • Eye movements during emotion recognition in faces.

    M. W. Schurgin;J. Nelson;S. Iida;H. Ohira

  • Functional association of the amygdala and ventral prefrontal cortex during cognitive evaluation of facial expressions primed by masked angry faces: an event-related fMRI study.

    Michio Nomura;Hideki Ohira;Kaoruko Haneda;Tetsuya Iidaka

  • Visual mismatch negativity: new evidence from the equiprobable paradigm.

    Motohiro Kimura;Jun'ichi Katayama;Hideki Ohira;Erich Schröger

  • Effect of negative air ions on computer operation, anxiety and salivary chromogranin A-like immunoreactivity.

    Hideo Nakane;Osamu Asami;Yukio Yamada;Hideki Ohira

  • The Effects of Music Listening after a Stressful Task on Immune Functions, Neuroendocrine Responses, and Emotional States in College Students

    Eri Hirokawa;Hideki Ohira

  • Crossmodal effect with rubber hand illusion and gamma-band activity.

    Noriaki Kanayama;Atsushi Sato;Hideki Ohira

  • The positive side of psychopathy: Emotional detachment in psychopathy and rational decision-making in the ultimatum game

    Takahiro Osumi;Takahiro Osumi;Hideki Ohira

  • An ERP study on self-relevant object recognition

    Makoto Miyakoshi;Michio Nomura;Hideki Ohira

  • Transient responses of inflammatory cytokines in acute stress

    Kaori Yamakawa;Masahiro Matsunaga;Masahiro Matsunaga;Tokiko Isowa;Kenta Kimura

  • Unintentional Temporal Context–Based Prediction of Emotional Faces: An Electrophysiological Study

    Motohiro Kimura;Haruka Kondo;Hideki Ohira;Erich Schröger

  • Neural evidence of effects of emotional valence on word recognition.

    Midori Inaba;Michio Nomura;Hideki Ohira

  • Effects of Stimulus Valence on Recognition Memory and Endogenous Eyeblinks: Further Evidence for Positive-Negative Asymmetry:

    Hideki Ohira;Ward M. Winton;Makiko Oyama

  • Reactivity of immune, endocrine and cardiovascular parameters to active and passive acute stress.

    Tokiko Isowa;Hideki Ohira;Seikou Murashima

  • The role of gamma band oscillations and synchrony on rubber hand illusion and crossmodal integration

    Noriaki Kanayama;Atsushi Sato;Hideki Ohira

  • Distinction between Externally vs. Internally Guided Decision-Making: Operational Differences, Meta-Analytical Comparisons and Their Theoretical Implications.

    Takashi Nakao;Hideki Ohira;Georg Northoff

  • Localizing sensory and cognitive systems for pre-attentive visual deviance detection: an sLORETA analysis of the data of Kimura et al. (2009).

    Motohiro Kimura;Hideki Ohira;Erich Schröger

Frequent Co-Authors

Tetsuya Iidaka
Tetsuya Iidaka Nagoya University
Akiko Tamakoshi
Akiko Tamakoshi Hokkaido University
Kenji Wakai
Kenji Wakai Nagoya University
Norihiro Sadato
Norihiro Sadato National Institute for Physiological Sciences
Georg Northoff
Georg Northoff University of Ottawa
Erich Schröger
Erich Schröger Leipzig University
Greg J. Siegle
Greg J. Siegle University of Pittsburgh
Gen Sobue
Gen Sobue Aichi Medical University
Wesley K. Thompson
Wesley K. Thompson University of California, San Diego
Masaki Tomonaga
Masaki Tomonaga University of Human Environments

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens the door to a variety of online degree options and rewarding career pathways. Aspiring professionals can specialize in areas like clinical counseling, school psychology, or marriage and family therapy (MFT). Online programs offer flexibility and accessibility, allowing students to balance education with other commitments.

If you're interested in becoming an MFT, it’s important to understand the educational and certification requirements which can vary by state and even by city. For example, the process for how to become an mft in Fresno may include supervised experience and specific coursework. In Garland, you'll want to review the mft requirements in Garland to ensure you meet all local standards.

Education pathways also differ from place to place—finding out the Gilbert mft education requirements and Glendale mft certification requirements will help you plan your studies accordingly. No matter where you study, accredited online psychology programs are designed to equip you with the necessary knowledge and credentials to pursue these specialized roles. Explore your options to find the pathway that suits your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Hideki Ohira

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles