World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gunther Eysenbach

Gunther Eysenbach

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
59
Citations
42078
World Ranking
3315
National Ranking
131

Gunther Eysenbach publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gunther Eysenbach sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 144 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Gunther Eysenbach D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gunther Eysenbach sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gunther Eysenbach is affiliated with the University of Victoria in Canada. Their research spans multiple fields within medicine and social sciences, with a particular emphasis on the intersection of technology and health.

Their work has focused on several main topics including:

  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Healthcare cost, quality, practices

Eysenbach's research covers key subfields such as sociology and political science, public health, environmental and occupational health, health informatics, epidemiology, and artificial intelligence. This multidisciplinary approach supports analysis of health issues from a broad and integrative perspective.

Some of their recent and widely cited papers include:

  • The Role of ChatGPT, Generative Language Models, and Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: A Conversation With ChatGPT and a Call for Papers (2023, JMIR Medical Education)
  • How to Fight an Infodemic: The Four Pillars of Infodemic Management (2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research)
  • Best Practices for Using AI Tools as an Author, Peer Reviewer, or Editor (2023, Journal of Medical Internet Research)
  • Advancing Infodemiology in a Digital Intensive Era (2022, JMIR Infodemiology)
  • Focusing on Digital Research Priorities for Advancing the Access and Quality of Mental Health (2023, JMIR Mental Health)

Frequent publication venues for Eysenbach include:

  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • JMIR Medical Education
  • JMIR Infodemiology
  • JMIR Mental Health
  • JMIRx Med

They have collaborated repeatedly with several researchers. Notable frequent co-authors are:

  • Tiffany I. Leung
  • Amaryllis Mavragani
  • Taiane de Azevedo Cardoso
  • Tim K. Mackey
  • Cynthia Baur

Gunther Eysenbach's work contributes to advancing understanding in artificial intelligence applications within healthcare and education, managing the impacts of misinformation, and improving practices related to health informatics and public health. Their output demonstrates engagement with emerging digital health challenges and cross-disciplinary research integration.

Best Publications

  • Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES)

    Gunther Eysenbach

  • How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews

    Gunther Eysenbach;Christian Köhler

  • Empirical Studies Assessing the Quality of Health Information for Consumers on the World Wide Web: A Systematic Review

    Gunther Eysenbach;John Powell;Oliver Kuss;Eun-Ryoung Sa

  • What is e-health?

    G Eysenbach

  • Pandemics in the Age of Twitter: Content Analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 Outbreak

    Cynthia Chew;Gunther Eysenbach;Gunther Eysenbach

  • CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of Web-based and mobile health interventions.

    Gunther Eysenbach

  • Medicine 2.0: Social Networking, Collaboration, Participation, Apomediation, and Openness

    Gunther Eysenbach

  • Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities

    Gunther Eysenbach;James E Till

  • A holistic framework to improve the uptake and impact of eHealth technologies.

    Julia E W C van Gemert-Pijnen;Nicol Nijland;Maarten van Limburg;Hans C Ossebaard

  • Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact

    Gunther Eysenbach

  • Infodemiology and infoveillance: framework for an emerging set of public health informatics methods to analyze search, communication and publication behavior on the Internet.

    Gunther Eysenbach

  • Citation advantage of open access articles.

    Gunther Eysenbach

  • Consumer health informatics

    Gunther Eysenbach

  • Using the Internet for Surveys and Health Research

    Gunther Eysenbach;Jeremy L. Wyatt

  • Social Media: A Review and Tutorial of Applications in Medicine and Health Care

    Francisco Jose Grajales;Samuel Sheps;Kendall Ho;Helen Novak-Lauscher

  • The Impact of the Internet on Cancer Outcomes

    Gunther Eysenbach

  • Towards quality management of medical information on the internet: evaluation, labelling, and filtering of information.

    Gunther Eysenbach;Thomas L Diepgen

  • Infodemiology: The epidemiology of (mis)information.

    Gunther Eysenbach

  • Infodemiology: tracking flu-related searches on the web for syndromic surveillance.

    Gunther Eysenbach

  • How to Fight an Infodemic: The Four Pillars of Infodemic Management.

    Gunther Eysenbach

  • Evidence-based Patient Choice and Consumer health informatics in the Internet age

    Gunther Eysenbach;Alejandro R Jadad

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas L. Diepgen
Thomas L. Diepgen Heidelberg University
Roger S. McIntyre
Roger S. McIntyre University of Toronto
Marie-Pierre Gagnon
Marie-Pierre Gagnon Université Laval
Aristotle N. Voineskos
Aristotle N. Voineskos Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Joanna Henderson
Joanna Henderson Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Gerhard Andersson
Gerhard Andersson Linköping University
Jeffrey S. Hoch
Jeffrey S. Hoch University of California, Davis
Pim Cuijpers
Pim Cuijpers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Dina Brooks
Dina Brooks McMaster University
Helen Christensen
Helen Christensen University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA can open doors to many related fields and flexible career pathways. For those interested in complementary technical skills, an online bachelor’s in electrical engineering is a strong option, enabling students to build on foundational programming with hardware expertise.

Not everyone has years to spend on formal education. If you’re seeking rapid entry into the tech workforce, pursuing quick certifications that pay well can be a smart move. These certifications validate practical abilities and can boost employability in less time.

For those looking to advance their education efficiently, there are quick masters degrees online that allow busy professionals to upskill in high-demand areas without interrupting their careers.

Finally, strategic learners can focus on the most worthwhile masters degrees to ensure their investment yields strong job prospects and long-term value. These options provide a pathway for growth, no matter where you are in your computer science journey.

Best Scientists Citing Gunther Eysenbach

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles