World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Saskia Marion Kelders

Saskia Marion Kelders

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
30
Citations
6706
World Ranking
11285
National Ranking
488

Saskia Marion Kelders publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Saskia Marion Kelders sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 150 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Saskia Marion Kelders D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Saskia Marion Kelders sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Persuasive System Design Does Matter: A Systematic Review of Adherence to Web-Based Interventions

    Saskia M Kelders;Robin N Kok;Hans C Ossebaard;Julia E W C Van Gemert-Pijnen

  • A holistic framework to improve the uptake and impact of eHealth technologies.

    Julia E W C van Gemert-Pijnen;Nicol Nijland;Maarten van Limburg;Hans C Ossebaard

  • Clarifying the Concept of Adherence to eHealth Technology: Systematic Review on When Usage Becomes Adherence.

    Floor Sieverink;Saskia M. Kelders;Saskia M. Kelders;Julia E.W.C. van Gemert-Pijnen

  • Factors Influencing the Use of a Web-Based Application for Supporting the Self-Care of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Longitudinal Study

    Nicol Nijland;Julia E.W.C. van Gemert-Pijnen;Saskia M. Kelders;Bart J. Brandenburg

  • How to Increase Reach and Adherence of Web-Based Interventions: A Design Research Viewpoint

    Geke D.S. Ludden;Thomas J.L. van Rompay;Saskia M. Kelders;Julia E.W.C. van Gemert-Pijnen

  • The concept and components of engagement in different domains applied to ehealth : A systematic scoping review

    Saskia M. Kelders;Saskia M. Kelders;Llewellyn Ellardus van Zyl;Geke D. S. Ludden

  • Effectiveness of a Web-based intervention aimed at healthy dietary and physical activity behavior: a randomized controlled trial about users and usage.

    Saskia M Kelders;Julia E W C Van Gemert-Pijnen;Andrea Werkman;Nicol Nijland

  • Investigating the Direct Impact of a Gamified Versus Nongamified Well-Being Intervention: An Exploratory Experiment.

    Saskia Marion Kelders;Marion Sommers-Spijkerman;Jochem Goldberg

  • Comparing human and automated support for depression: Fractional factorial randomized controlled trial

    Saskia Marion Kelders;Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer;Wendy Theresia Maria Pots;Julia E.W.C. van Gemert-Pijnen

  • Participants, usage, and use patterns of a web-based intervention for the prevention of depression within a randomized controlled trial.

    Saskia Marion Kelders;Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer;Julia E.W.C. van Gemert-Pijnen

  • Implementation strategies to enhance the implementation of eHealth programs for patients with chronic illnesses: realist systematic review

    Cecilie Varsi;Lise Solberg Nes;Lise Solberg Nes;Lise Solberg Nes;Olöf Birna Kristjansdottir;Saskia M Kelders;Saskia M Kelders

  • Development of a web-based intervention for the indicated prevention of depression

    Saskia Marion Kelders;Wendy Theresia Maria Pots;M.J. Oskam;Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer

  • Opening the Black Box of Electronic Health: Collecting, Analyzing, and Interpreting Log Data.

    Floor Sieverink;Saskia Kelders;Saskia Kelders;Mannes Poel;Lisette van Gemert-Pijnen

  • Understanding the Usage of Content in a Mental Health Intervention for Depression: An Analysis of Log Data

    Julia E.W.C. van Gemert-Pijnen;Saskia Marion Kelders;Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer

  • The relationship between persuasive technology principles, adherence and effect of web-Based interventions for mental health: A meta-analysis

    Gina Wildeboer;Saskia Marion Kelders;Julia E.W.C. van Gemert-Pijnen

  • Self-Guided Web-Based Interventions: Scoping Review on User Needs and the Potential of Embodied Conversational Agents to Address Them

    Mark R. Scholten;Saskia M. Kelders;Saskia M. Kelders;Julia E.W.C. Van Gemert-Pijnen

  • Psychometric Evaluation of the TWente Engagement with Ehealth Technologies Scale (TWEETS): Evaluation Study.

    Saskia Marion Kelders;Saskia Marion Kelders;Hanneke Kip;Japie Greeff

  • eHealth in Treatment of Offenders in Forensic Mental Health: A Review of the Current State.

    Hanneke Kip;Yvonne H. A. Bouman;Saskia M. Kelders;Saskia M. Kelders;Lisette J. E. W. C. van Gemert-Pijnen

  • Methods for human-centered eHealth development : a narrative scoping review (Preprint)

    Hanneke Kip;Julia Keizer;Marcia C. da Silva;Nienke Beerlage de Jong

  • An Exploration of the Benefits of an Animallike Robot Companion with More Advanced Touch Interaction Capabilities for Dementia Care

    Merel Madeleine Jung;Lisa van der Leij;Saskia Marion Kelders

Frequent Co-Authors

Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer
Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer University of Twente
Gerben Johan Westerhof
Gerben Johan Westerhof University of Twente
Mannes Poel
Mannes Poel University of Twente
Ruut Veenhoven
Ruut Veenhoven Erasmus University Rotterdam
Akihito Shimazu
Akihito Shimazu Keio University
Maria José Chambel
Maria José Chambel University of Lisbon
Sebastiaan Rothmann
Sebastiaan Rothmann North-West University
Robbert Sanderman
Robbert Sanderman University of Groningen
Jesus Alfonso D. Datu
Jesus Alfonso D. Datu University of Hong Kong

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Saskia Marion Kelders

Recently Published Articles