World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
63
Citations
15679
World Ranking
3119
National Ranking
1770

Stephen M. Schueller publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen M. Schueller sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 180 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Stephen M. Schueller D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen M. Schueller sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen M. Schueller is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of psychology, with particular emphasis on applied psychology, general health professions, experimental and cognitive psychology, sociology and political science, and clinical psychology.

The scientist's work extensively covers digital mental health interventions, addressing topics such as mental health research topics, the impact of technology on adolescents, mobile health and mHealth applications, telemedicine and telehealth implementation, mental health treatment and access, and COVID-19 and mental health.

Recent notable publications include:

  • Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review, 2021, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Implementation strategies for digital mental health interventions in health care settings, 2020, American Psychologist
  • Ecological momentary interventions for mental health: A scoping review, 2021, PLoS ONE
  • Scaling evidence-based treatments through digital mental health, 2020, American Psychologist
  • Banbury Forum Consensus Statement on the Path Forward for Digital Mental Health Treatment, 2021, Psychiatric Services

Stephen M. Schueller collaborates frequently with other researchers, including Nicole A. Stadnick, Dara H. Sorkin, Elizabeth V. Eikey, Dana B. Mukamel, and Margaret Schneider.

Their research appears regularly in several academic venues, with repeated publications in JMIR Formative Research, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Psychiatric Services, JMIR Mental Health, and the Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.

In addition to journal articles, Stephen M. Schueller has contributed to book publications, including a 2023 title published by Frontiers Media: The Good Side of Technology: How We Can Harness the Positive Potential of Digital Technology to Maximize Well-being.

Best Publications

  • Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review

    Judith Borghouts;Elizabeth Eikey;Gloria Mark;Cinthia De Leon

  • Mobile Phone Sensor Correlates of Depressive Symptom Severity in Daily-Life Behavior: An Exploratory Study

    Sohrab Saeb;Mi Zhang;Christopher J Karr;Stephen M Schueller

  • Behavioral intervention technologies: Evidence review and recommendations for future research in mental health.

    David C. Mohr;Michelle Nicole Burns;Stephen M. Schueller;Gregory Clarke

  • Personal Sensing: Understanding Mental Health Using Ubiquitous Sensors and Machine Learning.

    David C. Mohr;Mi Zhang;Stephen M. Schueller

  • The Behavioral Intervention Technology Model: An Integrated Conceptual and Technological Framework for eHealth and mHealth Interventions

    David C Mohr;Stephen M Schueller;Enid Montague;Michelle Nicole Burns

  • Pursuit of pleasure, engagement, and meaning: Relationships to subjective and objective measures of well-being

    Stephen M. Schueller;Martin E.P. Seligman

  • Smartphone-Based Conversational Agents and Responses to Questions About Mental Health, Interpersonal Violence, and Physical Health

    Adam S. Miner;Arnold Milstein;Stephen Schueller;Roshini Hegde

  • Three Problems With Current Digital Mental Health Research . . . and Three Things We Can Do About Them

    David C. Mohr;Ken R. Weingardt;Madhu Reddy;Stephen M. Schueller

  • Accelerating Digital Mental Health Research From Early Design and Creation to Successful Implementation and Sustainment

    David C Mohr;Aaron R Lyon;Emily G Lattie;Madhu Reddy

  • IntelliCare: An Eclectic, Skills-Based App Suite for the Treatment of Depression and Anxiety

    David C Mohr;Kathryn Noth Tomasino;Emily G Lattie;Hannah L Palac

  • The relationship between mobile phone location sensor data and depressive symptom severity.

    Sohrab Saeb;Emily G. Lattie;Stephen M. Schueller;Konrad P. Kording

  • Towards an Artificially Empathic Conversational Agent for Mental Health Applications: System Design and User Perceptions.

    Robert R Morris;Kareem Kouddous;Rohan Kshirsagar;Stephen M Schueller

  • Disseminating self-help: positive psychology exercises in an online trial.

    Stephen M Schueller;Acacia C Parks;Acacia C Parks

  • Use of Digital Mental Health for Marginalized and Underserved Populations

    Stephen M. Schueller;John F. Hunter;Caroline Figueroa;Adrian Aguilera;Adrian Aguilera

  • Preferences for positive psychology exercises

    Stephen M. Schueller

  • Trials of Intervention Principles: Evaluation Methods for Evolving Behavioral Intervention Technologies

    David C Mohr;Stephen M Schueller;William T Riley;C Hendricks Brown

  • Efficacy of a Web-Based, Crowdsourced Peer-To-Peer Cognitive Reappraisal Platform for Depression: Randomized Controlled Trial

    Robert R Morris;Stephen M Schueller;Rosalind W Picard

  • State of the Field of Mental Health Apps.

    Martha Neary;Stephen M. Schueller

  • Implementation strategies for digital mental health interventions in health care settings.

    Andrea K Graham;Emily G Lattie;Byron J Powell;Aaron R Lyon

  • The Wiley Blackwell handbook of positive psychological interventions.

    Acacia C. Parks;Stephen M. Schueller

  • Continuous Evaluation of Evolving Behavioral Intervention Technologies

    David C. Mohr;Ken Cheung;Stephen M. Schueller;C. Hendricks Brown

  • Strategies for mHealth research: lessons from 3 mobile intervention studies

    Dror Ben-Zeev;Stephen M. Schueller;Mark Begale;Jennifer Duffecy

Frequent Co-Authors

David C. Mohr
David C. Mohr Northwestern University
Ricardo F. Muñoz
Ricardo F. Muñoz Palo Alto University
Alyson K. Zalta
Alyson K. Zalta University of California, Irvine
Eliseo J. Pérez-Stable
Eliseo J. Pérez-Stable National Institutes of Health
Konrad P. Kording
Konrad P. Kording University of Pennsylvania
Frank J. Penedo
Frank J. Penedo University of Miami
Josef I. Ruzek
Josef I. Ruzek University of Colorado Colorado Springs
Munmun De Choudhury
Munmun De Choudhury Georgia Institute of Technology
Mercedes R. Carnethon
Mercedes R. Carnethon Northwestern University
Martin E. P. Seligman
Martin E. P. Seligman University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens doors to a wide range of roles, from counseling to clinical therapy. One common path is becoming a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC), which typically requires a relevant master’s degree, supervised clinical experience, and passing state licensure exams.

Requirements for licensure differ by location. For example, those interested in Pittsburgh licensed therapist requirements should understand Pennsylvania’s specific education and supervised hours mandates. If you want to learn about becoming a licensed therapist in Plano, Texas guidelines include a state-specific exam and criminal background check.

You can also discover the process for becoming a licensed therapist in Port St. Lucie, where Florida requires additional coursework in topics like domestic violence and Florida law. Meanwhile, those looking into how to become a licensed therapist in Portland will find unique steps set out by Oregon’s licensing board.

Earning an online psychology degree can set the foundation for these roles. With flexible programs and accredited tracks, online study makes it easier to pursue licensure, regardless of your location.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen M. Schueller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles