World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Thomas L. Diepgen

Thomas L. Diepgen

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 97 9412 8829 520 496 492 29079

Thomas L. Diepgen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas L. Diepgen between 1983 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas L. Diepgen published across 42 years, from 1983 to 2024, averaging 12.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 40 publications in 2014. 6 of the 543 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 40. Peak 40 publications in 2014. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 20 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 16 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 18 publications 2005: 34 publications 2006: 21 publications 2007: 26 publications 2008: 27 publications 2009: 28 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 25 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 40 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 1 publication
1983 2024

543 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas L. Diepgen: publications per year, 1983 to 2024
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 2
1987 4
1988 4
1989 4
1990 5
1991 4
1992 5
1993 6
1994 4
1995 9
1996 8
1997 11
1998 20
1999 8
2000 14
2001 11
2002 16
2003 16
2004 18
2005 34
2006 21
2007 26
2008 27
2009 28
2010 18
2011 25
2012 25
2013 21
2014 40
2015 21
2016 20
2017 14
2018 21
2019 7
2020 15
2021 4
2022 0
2023 5
2024 1
Total 543
Download as CSV

Thomas L. Diepgen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas L. Diepgen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 481–500 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 492 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713 492
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas L. Diepgen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas L. Diepgen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 96–97 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779 97
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Thomas L. Diepgen is affiliated with Heidelberg University in Germany and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a particular focus on dermatology. Their research covers various subfields including epidemiology, oncology, public health, environmental and occupational health, and psychiatry and mental health.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics, primarily focusing on skin-related conditions and diseases. Main topics include:

  • Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
  • Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research
  • Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
  • Occupational exposure and asthma
  • Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research

Thomas L. Diepgen has published frequently in several journals. Notable publication venues include:

  • JDDG Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft
  • Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
  • Dermatitis
  • International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
  • Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Diepgen include:

  • No evidence of increased cancer incidence in children using topical tacrolimus for atopic dermatitis (2020), Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
  • S3 guideline for actinic keratosis and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma - short version, part 1: diagnosis, interventions for actinic keratoses, care structures and quality-of-care indicators (2020), JDDG Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft
  • S3 guideline for actinic keratosis and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) - short version, part 2: epidemiology, surgical and systemic treatment of cSCC, follow-up, prevention and occupational disease (2020), JDDG Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft
  • Causes of irritant contact dermatitis after occupational skin exposure: a systematic review (2021), International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
  • Update "Systemic treatment of atopic dermatitis" of the S2k-guideline on atopic dermatitis (2021), JDDG Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft

The scientist collaborates regularly with several co-authors in their research. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Andrea Bauer
  • Swen Malte John
  • Markus V. Heppt
  • Ulrike Leiter
  • Theresa Steeb

Best Publications

  • The epidemiology of skin cancer.

    Thomas L Diepgen;V Mahler

  • Histopathological Findings in Brain Tissue Obtained during Epilepsy Surgery.

    Blumcke I;Spreafico R;Haaker G;Coras R

  • Age related, structured educational programmes for the management of atopic dermatitis in children and adolescents: multicentre, randomised controlled trial

    Doris Staab;Thomas L Diepgen;Manigé Fartasch;Jörg Kupfer

  • The occurrence of atopic dermatitis in north Europe: an international questionnaire study

    Finn Schultz Larsen;Thomas Diepgen;Åke Svensson

  • The epidemiology of occupational contact dermatitis.

    TL Diepgen;Pieter Jan Coenraads

  • Efficacy and safety of oral alitretinoin (9-cis retinoic acid) in patients with severe chronic hand eczema refractory to topical corticosteroids: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial

    T Ruzicka;C. W Lynde;G. B. E Jemec;T Diepgen

  • Allergic contact dermatitis: epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, in vitro methods and regulatory aspects Current knowledge assembled at an international workshop at BfR, Germany

    M. Peiser;T. Tralau;J. Heidler;A. M. Api

  • Occupational ultraviolet light exposure increases the risk for the development of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    J. Schmitt;A. Seidler;T.L. Diepgen;A. Bauer

  • Breastfeeding duration is a risk factor for atopic eczema

    R. L. Bergmann;T. L. Diepgen;O. Kuss;K. E. Bergmann

  • High-dose UVA1 therapy in the treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis.

    Jean Krutmann;Wolfgang Czech;Thomas Diepgen;Roland Niedner

  • Management of chronic hand eczema

    Thomas L. Diepgen;Tove Agner;Werner Aberer;John Berth-Jones

  • Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment compared with that of hydrocortisone butyrate ointment in adult patients with atopic dermatitis.

    Sakari Reitamo;Malcolm Rustin;Thomas Ruzicka;Frédéric Cambazard

  • Characterization of different courses of atopic dermatitis in adolescent and adult patients

    D. Garmhausen;T. Hagemann;T. Bieber;I. Dimitriou

  • Prevalence of contact allergy in the general population in different European regions.

    T L Diepgen;R F Ofenloch;Magnus Bruze;P Bertuccio

  • Is occupational solar ultraviolet irradiation a relevant risk factor for basal cell carcinoma? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the epidemiological literature

    A. Bauer;T.L. Diepgen;J. Schmitt

  • High-dose UVA1 radiation therapy for localized scleroderma

    Helger Stege;Mark Berneburg;Stefanie Humke;Michaela Klammer

  • Occupational skin-disease data in Europe

    Thomas L. Diepgen

  • Confirmation of the association between high levels of immunoglobulin E food sensitization and eczema in infancy: an international study

    D. J. Hill;C. S. Hosking;F. M. de Benedictis;A. P. Oranje

  • Shopping around the internet today and tomorrow: towards the millennium of cybermedicine

    Gunther Eysenbach;Eun Ryoung Sa;Thomas L Diepgen

  • High-dose UVA1 therapy for atopic dermatitis: Results of a multicenter trial

    Jean Krutmann;Thomas L. Diepgen;Thomas L. Diepgen;Thomas A. Luger;Thomas A. Luger;Stephan Grabbe;Stephan Grabbe

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Elsner
Peter Elsner Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Jochen Schmitt
Jochen Schmitt TU Dresden
Luigi Naldi
Luigi Naldi Centro Studi GISED
Klaus Ejner Andersen
Klaus Ejner Andersen University of Southern Denmark
Thomas Werfel
Thomas Werfel Hannover Medical School
Johannes Geier
Johannes Geier University of Göttingen
Matthias Augustin
Matthias Augustin Universität Hamburg
Werner Aberer
Werner Aberer University of Graz
Axel Schnuch
Axel Schnuch University of Göttingen
Howard I. Maibach
Howard I. Maibach University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open new doors in the healthcare field if you’re interested in options beyond traditional medical school. Many students consider becoming a nurse, and there are universities that offer nursing school that does not require teas test admissions, making the process smoother for applicants concerned about entrance exams.

For those drawn to healthcare management, online health administration programs offer accessible pathways to move into leadership roles without having to pause your career. Similarly, nurses who want to advance their qualifications should look into adn to msn bridge programs, which efficiently transition registered nurses from associate to master’s degrees online.

Nutrition is another rapidly growing health profession. A nutritionist online degree can prepare you for a career in wellness, public health, or clinical settings, allowing you to tailor your education for your future goals. Exploring these online educational pathways can help you determine the right fit for your aspirations in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas L. Diepgen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles