World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jochen Schmitt

Jochen Schmitt

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 81 16573 15590 864 832 506 25514

Jochen Schmitt publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jochen Schmitt between 1999 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jochen Schmitt published across 28 years, from 1999 to 2026, averaging 27.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 69 publications in 2022. 53 of the 777 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 69. Peak 69 publications in 2022. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 26 publications 2012: 26 publications 2013: 34 publications 2014: 38 publications 2015: 37 publications 2016: 56 publications 2017: 51 publications 2018: 47 publications 2019: 37 publications 2020: 40 publications 2021: 64 publications 2022: 69 publications 2023: 68 publications 2024: 63 publications 2025: 51 publications 2026: 2 publications
1999 2026

777 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jochen Schmitt: publications per year, 1999 to 2026
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 0
2001 1
2002 0
2003 0
2004 2
2005 2
2006 4
2007 14
2008 15
2009 16
2010 13
2011 26
2012 26
2013 34
2014 38
2015 37
2016 56
2017 51
2018 47
2019 37
2020 40
2021 64
2022 69
2023 68
2024 63
2025 51
2026 2
Total 777
Download as CSV

Jochen Schmitt publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jochen Schmitt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 501–520 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 506 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617 506
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jochen Schmitt D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jochen Schmitt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972 81
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jochen Schmitt is affiliated with TU Dresden in Germany and has an extensive research background primarily in the field of Medicine. Their scholarly work encompasses a range of subfields including General Health Professions, Dermatology, Immunology and Allergy, Oncology, and Economics and Econometrics. The focus of their research spans key topics such as Dermatology and Skin Diseases, Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization, Health and Medical Studies, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, Asthma and respiratory diseases, Clinical practice guidelines implementation, and the Delphi Technique in Research.

Jochen Schmitt has published numerous articles in various academic venues. Some of the recent publications include:

  • A core outcome set for post-COVID-19 condition in adults for use in clinical practice and research: an international Delphi consensus study (2022) in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
  • Comparison of different rating scales for the use in Delphi studies: different scales lead to different consensus and show different test-retest reliability (2020) in BMC Medical Research Methodology
  • Regional responsibility and coordination of appropriate inpatient care capacities for patients with COVID-19 - the German DISPENSE model (2022) in PLoS ONE
  • Systemic Immunomodulatory Treatments for Atopic Dermatitis (2022) in JAMA Dermatology
  • Systemic Immunomodulatory Treatments for Patients With Atopic Dermatitis (2020) in JAMA Dermatology

The scientist collaborates frequently with a core group of co-authors, including Olaf Schoffer, Stephan Weidinger, Falko Tesch, Christian Apfelbacher, and Thomas Werfel, reflecting a network of professional associations within their research community.

The primary publication venues for Jochen Schmitt's work include:

  • Das Gesundheitswesen
  • British Journal of Dermatology
  • JDDG Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft
  • Zeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen
  • Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

Jochen Schmitt's contributions illustrate a multidisciplinary approach, integrating clinical and health systems research with specialized insights into dermatological conditions. Their work on Delphi consensus methods and health services coordination highlights a commitment to both methodological rigor and practical applications in healthcare.

Best Publications

  • The COMET Handbook: Version 1.0

    Paula R. Williamson;Douglas G. Altman;Heather Bagley;Karen L. Barnes

  • Adverse effects of biologics: a network meta‐analysis and Cochrane overview

    Jasvinder A Singh;George A Wells;Robin Christensen;Elizabeth Tanjong Ghogomu

  • The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index Is the Adequate Criterion to Define Severity in Chronic Plaque-Type Psoriasis

    Jochen Schmitt;Gottfried Wozel

  • Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement.

    Jamie J. Kirkham;Sarah Gorst;Douglas G. Altman;Jane M. Blazeby

  • What are the best outcome measurements for atopic eczema? A systematic review

    Jochen Schmitt;Sinead Langan;Hywel C Williams

  • Occupational ultraviolet light exposure increases the risk for the development of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    J. Schmitt;A. Seidler;T.L. Diepgen;A. Bauer

  • Effect of intraoperative high Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) with recruitment maneuvers vs low PEEP on postoperative pulmonary complications in obese patients : a randomized clinical trial

    Thomas Bluth;Ary Serpa Neto;Marcus J. Schultz;Paolo Pelosi

  • Efficacy and safety of systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a systematic review.

    Evelien Roekevisch;Phyllis Ira Spuls;Denise Kuester;Jacqueline Limpens

  • EASI, (objective) SCORAD and POEM for atopic eczema: responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference.

    M. E. Schram;Ph. I. Spuls;M. M. G. Leeflang;R. Lindeboom

  • Cyclosporin in the treatment of patients with atopic eczema – a systematic review and meta‐analysis

    J Schmitt;N Schmitt;M Meurer

  • Is occupational solar ultraviolet irradiation a relevant risk factor for basal cell carcinoma? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the epidemiological literature

    A. Bauer;T.L. Diepgen;J. Schmitt

  • The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) statement to assess clinical signs of atopic eczema in trials.

    Jochen Schmitt;Phyllis I. Spuls;Kim S. Thomas;Eric Simpson

  • A randomized trial of methotrexate versus azathioprine for severe atopic eczema.

    Mandy Elvira Schram;Evelien Roekevisch;Mariska Maria Geertruida Leeflang;Jan Dositheus Bos

  • Efficacy and tolerability of proactive treatment with topical corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors for atopic eczema: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

    J. Schmitt;L. von Kobyletzki;Å. Svensson;C. Apfelbacher

  • Assessment of clinical signs of atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and recommendation

    Jochen Schmitt;Sinéad Langan;Stefanie Deckert;Ake Svensson

  • Developmental comorbidity in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

    Regina Taurines;Jochen Schmitt;Tobias Renner;Alex Curtis Conner

  • Is atopic disease a risk factor for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder? A systematic review

    J. Schmitt;A. Buske-Kirschbaum;V. Roessner

  • When does atopic dermatitis warrant systemic therapy? Recommendations from an expert panel of the International Eczema Council

    Eric L. Simpson;Marjolein Bruin-Weller;Carsten Flohr;Michael R. Ardern-Jones

  • The Harmonizing Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) roadmap: a methodological framework to develop core sets of outcome measurements in dermatology.

    Jochen Schmitt;Christian Apfelbacher;Phyllis I. Spuls;Kim S. Thomas

  • Efficacy and tolerability of biologic and nonbiologic systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe psoriasis: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

    J Schmitt;Z Zhang;G Wozel;M Meurer

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas L. Diepgen
Thomas L. Diepgen Heidelberg University
Hywel C. Williams
Hywel C. Williams University of Nottingham
Stephan Weidinger
Stephan Weidinger Kiel University
Carsten Flohr
Carsten Flohr King's College London
Matthias Augustin
Matthias Augustin Universität Hamburg
Marcel Romanos
Marcel Romanos University of Würzburg
Thomas Werfel
Thomas Werfel Hannover Medical School
Eric L. Simpson
Eric L. Simpson Oregon Health & Science University
Joachim Heinrich
Joachim Heinrich Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Alan D. Irvine
Alan D. Irvine Trinity College Dublin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative healthcare degree paths can open doors to diverse careers beyond traditional medicine. Many students are now opting for flexible, affordable online programs to balance their studies with personal and professional commitments.

Administration roles in healthcare are increasingly vital. If you’re interested in leadership positions, consider the cheapest master's in healthcare administration programs available online. Similarly, those aspiring to advanced nursing careers can find accessible and reputable cheapest dnp programs that prepare you for high-level nursing practice.

For those keen on pharmaceutical sciences, enrolling in online pharmacy schools can lead to pharmacist licensure and specialized roles. Additionally, the shift to digital health systems has made the health information management degree online a strategic choice for those interested in health data management and informatics.

Each of these pathways offers unique opportunities in the broader healthcare ecosystem, allowing you to align your education with your career goals and interests.

Best Scientists Citing Jochen Schmitt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles