World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Carolyn E. Schwartz

Carolyn E. Schwartz

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 55 1980 1792 950 848 213 17515

Carolyn E. Schwartz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Carolyn E. Schwartz between 1986 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Carolyn E. Schwartz published across 41 years, from 1986 to 2026, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2017. 4 of the 265 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2017. 1986: 2 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 14 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 3 publications 2026: 1 publication
1986 2026

265 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Carolyn E. Schwartz: publications per year, 1986 to 2026
Year Publications
1986 2
1987 0
1988 0
1989 1
1990 1
1991 0
1992 2
1993 0
1994 3
1995 2
1996 7
1997 2
1998 4
1999 14
2000 5
2001 1
2002 3
2003 3
2004 5
2005 7
2006 3
2007 6
2008 10
2009 12
2010 9
2011 9
2012 9
2013 13
2014 8
2015 9
2016 13
2017 16
2018 13
2019 7
2020 9
2021 14
2022 14
2023 10
2024 15
2025 3
2026 1
Total 265
Download as CSV

Carolyn E. Schwartz publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carolyn E. Schwartz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 204–213 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 213 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285 213
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Carolyn E. Schwartz D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carolyn E. Schwartz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137 55
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Carolyn E. Schwartz is affiliated with Tufts University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of medicine and psychology, with significant contributions within clinical psychology, surgery, general health professions, pathology and forensic medicine, and psychiatry and mental health.

The scientist's work covers several main topics including musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, COVID-19 and mental health, health systems with economic evaluations and quality of life, spine and intervertebral disc pathology, scoliosis diagnosis and treatment, psychological well-being and life satisfaction, as well as patient satisfaction in healthcare.

Carolyn E. Schwartz has published extensively in a range of journals, with frequent appearances in Quality of Life Research and the Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes. Other venues include the Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, Journal of Neurosurgery Spine, and Journal of Personalized Medicine.

The frequent coauthors collaborating with Schwartz include Bruce D. Rapkin, Roland B. Stark, Katrina Borowiec, Joel Finkelstein, and I-Chan Huang.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Schwartz include:

  • "Patient Factors That Matter in Predicting Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes: A Machine-Learning Approach," 2021, The Journal of Arthroplasty
  • "Capturing patient experience: does quality-of-life appraisal entail a new class of measurement?," 2020, Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
  • "Creating idiometric short-form measures of cognitive appraisal: balancing theory and pragmatics," 2021, Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
  • "Does response shift impact interpretation of change even among scales developed using item response theory?," 2020, Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
  • "Patient factors that matter in predicting spine surgery outcomes: a machine learning approach," 2021, Journal of Neurosurgery Spine

Best Publications

  • Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model

    Mirjam A.G Sprangers;Carolyn E Schwartz;Carolyn E Schwartz

  • Methodological approaches for assessing response shift in longitudinal health-related quality-of-life research.

    Carolyn E Schwartz;Mirjam A.G Sprangers

  • ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research

    Bryce B. Reeve;Kathleen W. Wyrwich;Albert W. Wu;Galina Velikova

  • Altruistic social interest behaviors are associated with better mental health.

    Carolyn E. Schwartz;Janice Bell Meisenhelder;Yunsheng Ma;George W. Reed

  • Toward a theoretical model of quality-of-life appraisal: Implications of findings from studies of response shift

    Bruce D Rapkin;Carolyn E Schwartz

  • The clinical significance of adaptation to changing health: a meta-analysis of response shift.

    Carolyn E. Schwartz;Rita Bode;Nicholas Repucci;Janine Becker

  • Response Shift Theory: Important Implications for Measuring Quality of Life in People With Disability

    Carolyn E. Schwartz;Elena M. Andresen;Margaret A. Nosek;Gloria L. Krahn

  • Helping others helps oneself: response shift effects in peer support.

    Unknown

  • Reconsidering the psychometrics of quality of life assessment in light of response shift and appraisal.

    Carolyn E Schwartz;Bruce D Rapkin

  • Psychosocial correlates of fatigue in multiple sclerosis

    Carolyn E. Schwartz;Linda Coulthard-Morris;Qi Zeng

  • Concomitant obsessive-compulsive disorder and schizotypal personality disorder.

    Michael A Jenike;Lee Baer;William E. Minichiello;Carl E. Schwartz

  • Early intervention in planning end-of-life care with ambulatory geriatric patients: results of a pilot trial.

    Carolyn E. Schwartz;H. Brownell Wheeler;Bernard Hammes;Noreen Basque

  • Exploring response shift in longitudinal data

    Carolyn E. Schwartz;Mirjam A.G. Sprangers;Amy Carey;George Reed

  • Measuring self-efficacy in people with multiple scleoris: a validation study☆☆☆

    Carolyn E. Schwartz;Linda Coulthard-Morris;Qi Zeng;Paul Retzlaff

  • Validation of a New Measure of Concept of a Good Death

    Carolyn E. Schwartz;Kathleen M. Mazor;H. Jane Rogers;Yunsheng Ma

  • Guidelines for improving the stringency of response shift research using the thentest

    Carolyn E. Schwartz;Mirjam A. G. Sprangers

  • Helping Others Shows Differential Benefits on Health and Well-being for Male and Female Teens

    Carolyn E. Schwartz;Penelope M. Keyl;John P. Marcum;Rita Bode

  • The challenge of response shift for quality-of-life-based clinical oncology research.

    Unknown

  • Health Conditions: Effect on Function, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Life Satisfaction After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury. A Prospective Observational Registry Cohort Study.

    Carly S. Rivers;Nader Fallah;Vanessa K. Noonan;Vanessa K. Noonan;David G. Whitehurst

  • Prospective evaluation of chronic pain associated with posterior autologous iliac crest bone graft harvest and its effect on postoperative outcome.

    Carolyn E Schwartz;Carolyn E Schwartz;Julia F Martha;Paulette Kowalski;David A Wang

  • Outcome of percutaneous rupture of lumbar synovial cysts: a case series of 101 patients.

    Julia F. Martha;Bryan Swaim;David A. Wang;David H. Kim;David H. Kim

  • Caregiver role stress: when families become providers.

    Bonnie Teschendorf;Carolyn Schwartz;Carol Estwing Ferrans;Ann O'Mara

  • Association of catechol-O-methyltransferase genetic variants with outcome in patients undergoing surgical treatment for lumbar degenerative disc disease.

    Feng Dai;Inna Belfer;Carolyn E. Schwartz;Robert Banco

  • Evaluation of the Missoula-VITAS Quality of Life Index—Revised: Research Tool or Clinical Tool?

    Carolyn E. Schwartz;Melanie P. Merriman;George Reed;Ira Byock

  • Patient-reported outcomes in spine surgery: past, current, and future directions.

    Joel A Finkelstein;Carolyn E Schwartz

Frequent Co-Authors

Joel S. Finkelstein
Joel S. Finkelstein Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
Mirjam A. G. Sprangers
Mirjam A. G. Sprangers University of Amsterdam
Ralph H.B. Benedict
Ralph H.B. Benedict University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Timothy Vollmer
Timothy Vollmer University of Florida
George W. Reed
George W. Reed University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Sara Ahmed
Sara Ahmed McGill University Health Centre
Rita K. Bode
Rita K. Bode Northwestern University
Frans J. Oort
Frans J. Oort University of Amsterdam
Yuelin Li
Yuelin Li Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Social Sciences and Humanities offers a diverse range of online degree opportunities. If you're aiming for a quick transition to the professional world, consider 1 year msw programs online no bsw. These accelerated routes do not require a prior Bachelor of Social Work, making them accessible for students from various backgrounds.

For those interested in human behavior and mental health, accelerated psychology programs online can help you earn your degree faster and begin your psychology career sooner. Counseling is another rewarding path; studying at cacrep accredited universities ensures your education meets high professional standards and prepares you for licensure.

Marriage and family therapy is a rapidly growing field as well. If you’re budget-conscious, review the options for a reputable marriage and family therapist degree that can be completed online at an affordable cost. Each pathway offers unique career possibilities and flexibility—ideal for students balancing education with other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Carolyn E. Schwartz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles