World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 54 4550 4210 65 62 309 12794

Jose Morais publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jose Morais between 1973 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jose Morais published across 53 years, from 1973 to 2025, averaging 7.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2005. 10 of the 392 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2005. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 2 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 5 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 9 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 7 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 15 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 12 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 9 publications 1992: 16 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 20 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 6 publications
1973 2025

392 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jose Morais: publications per year, 1973 to 2025
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 2
1975 3
1976 2
1977 3
1978 0
1979 5
1980 3
1981 0
1982 9
1983 4
1984 2
1985 7
1986 6
1987 15
1988 4
1989 12
1990 3
1991 9
1992 16
1993 9
1994 12
1995 10
1996 9
1997 9
1998 7
1999 6
2000 7
2001 6
2002 5
2003 10
2004 14
2005 20
2006 12
2007 15
2008 16
2009 13
2010 9
2011 11
2012 5
2013 8
2014 13
2015 6
2016 8
2017 2
2018 13
2019 5
2020 2
2021 5
2022 6
2023 3
2024 4
2025 6
Total 392
Download as CSV

Jose Morais publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jose Morais sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–310 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 309 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102 309
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jose Morais D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jose Morais sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 54
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jose Morais is a researcher affiliated with the Université Libre de Bruxelles in Belgium, specializing primarily in the field of Medicine. Their research portfolio spans multiple subfields including Physiology, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Economics and Econometrics, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Molecular Biology.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
  • Diet and metabolism studies
  • Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Jose Morais has contributed to the publication of research papers on a variety of topics. Some recent papers authored or co-authored by them include:

  • The phoneme: A conceptual heritage from alphabetic literacy, 2021, published in Cognition
  • Impact of literacy on the functional connectivity of vision and language related networks, 2020, published in NeuroImage
  • Multiplatform metabolomics for an integrative exploration of metabolic syndrome in older men, 2021, published in EBioMedicine
  • Motoric cognitive risk syndrome and incident dementia in older adults from the Québec NuAge cohort, 2020, published in Age and Ageing
  • Frailty and adverse outcomes in older adults being discharged from the emergency department: A prospective cohort study, 2020, published in Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine

The venues where Jose Morais has frequently published include:

  • Pharmaceutics
  • Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science
  • Signo
  • Innovation in Aging
  • NeuroImage

Frequent co-authors of Jose Morais include:

  • Paulo Paixão
  • Pierrette Gaudreau
  • Luís F. Gouveia
  • Nuno Silva
  • Régine Kolinsky

Best Publications

  • Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously

    José Morais;Luz Cary;Jésus Alegria;Paul Bertelson

  • How Learning to Read Changes the Cortical Networks for Vision and Language

    Stanislas Dehaene;Felipe Pegado;Felipe Pegado;Lucia W. Braga;Paulo Ventura

  • Illiterate to literate: behavioural and cerebral changes induced by reading acquisition

    Stanislas Dehaene;Laurent Cohen;José Morais;Régine Kolinsky

  • The relationships between segmental analysis and alphabetic literacy: An interactive view.

    Jose Morais;Jesus Alegria Iscoa

  • Literacy training and speech segmentation

    José Morais;José Morais;Paul Bertelson;Paul Bertelson;Luz Cary;Luz Cary;Jesus Alegria;Jesus Alegria

  • Analytic approaches to human cognition

    Jesus Alegria Iscoa;Daniel Holender;Jose Morais;Monique Radeau

  • Spatial associations for musical stimuli: a piano in the head?

    Pascale Lidji;Regine Kolinsky;Aliette Lochy;Jose Morais

  • Phonetic analysis of speech and memory codes in beginning readers.

    Jesus Alegria;Elisabeth Pignot;José Morais

  • Phonetic segmentation in prereaders: effect of corrective information

    Régine Kolinsky;José Morais;Paul Bertelson

  • Phonological priming between monosyllabic spoken words.

    Monique Radeau;José Morais;Juan Segui

  • Dichotic perception and laterality in neonates

    Josiane Bertoncini;José Morais;Ranka Bijeljac-Babic;Stephen McAdams

  • The locus of the orthographic consistency effect in auditory word recognition

    Paulo Ventura;José Morais;Chotiga Pattamadilok;Régine Kolinsky

  • Metaphonological abilities of adult illiterates: New evidence of heterogeneity

    Paul Bertelson;Beatrice de Gelder;Leda V. Tfouni;Jose Morais

  • Timing the impact of literacy on visual processing

    Felipe Pegado;Enio Comerlato;Fabricio Ventura;Antoinette Jobert

  • Perception and awareness in phonological processing: The case of the phoneme.

    José Morais;Régine Kolinsky

  • Metaphonological abilities of spanish illiterate adults

    José Antonio Adrián;Jesús Alegria;José Morais

  • Phonetic analysis capacity and learning to read

    P. Bertelson;J. Morais;J. Alegria

  • Segmentation Abilities of Dyslexics and Normal Readers

    José Morais;Mireille Cluytens;Jesus Alegria

  • Phonological priming in spoken word recognition: task effects.

    Monique Radeau;Josè Morais;Agnlès Dewier

  • Phonological Awareness: A Bridge Between Language and Literacy

    Unknown

  • Categorical perception of speech sounds in illiterate adults

    Willy Serniclaes;Paulo Ventura;José Morais;Régine Kolinsky

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Bertelson
Paul Bertelson Université Libre de Bruxelles
Isabelle Peretz
Isabelle Peretz University of Montreal
Stanislas Dehaene
Stanislas Dehaene Collège de France
São Luís Castro
São Luís Castro University of Porto
Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz
Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Antoinette Jobert
Antoinette Jobert Grenoble Alpes University
Raymond Cluydts
Raymond Cluydts Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Laurent D. Cohen
Laurent D. Cohen Paris Dauphine University
Olivier Klein
Olivier Klein Université Libre de Bruxelles
Martial Van der Linden
Martial Van der Linden University of Geneva

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens doors to diverse professional paths, many of which begin with online degree programs in counseling, therapy, or clinical psychology. Graduates often pursue licensure as therapists, but each state and city may have its own distinct requirements for education, supervised experience, and exams.

For instance, licensed therapist requirements in Durham include a master’s degree in counseling and specific hours of supervised practice. Meanwhile, licensed therapist requirements in El Paso feature criteria unique to Texas, such as passing the National Counselor Examination.

If you plan to practice elsewhere, it’s crucial to research requirements by location. For aspiring professionals, Fort Wayne licensed therapist education requirements and Fort Worth licensed therapist requirements provide city-specific guidance on education, application steps, and clinical experience.

These pathways highlight the importance of selecting an accredited online psychology program aligned with your target state’s standards. Understanding local regulations ensures a smooth transition from your degree to a rewarding psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Jose Morais

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles