World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
21047
World Ranking
17223
National Ranking
721

Gina Lockwood publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gina Lockwood sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 279 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Gina Lockwood D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gina Lockwood sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gina Lockwood is affiliated with the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer in Canada and has a publication record primarily in the field of Medicine, with additional work in Engineering. Their research contributions focus especially on pediatric and urological topics, including pediatric urology and nephrology studies as well as broader urological disorders and treatments.

The scientist has authored several recent papers across notable venues, highlighting diverse interests within medical research. These publications include:

  • A Pandora's box in feline medicine: presenting signs and surgical outcomes in 58 previously hoarded cats with chronic otitis media-interna (2023, Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery)
  • PD48-11 DECISIONAL CONFLICT IN PARENTS REGARDING NEWBORN CIRCUMCISION (2022, The Journal of Urology)
  • MP11-02 USE OF A MANUAL TRIGGER WITH A TRADITIONAL MOISTURE ALARM FOR TREATMENT OF PRIMARY MONOSYMPTOMATIC NOCTURNAL ENURESIS (2022, The Journal of Urology)
  • MP08-02 ARE YOU A MORNING PERSON? THE IMPACT OF MODIFIABLE PERIOPERATIVE AND OPERATIVE VARIABLES ON EARLY POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING PRIMARY HYPOSPADIAS REPAIR (HR) (2022, The Journal of Urology)
  • MP70-02 THE UTILITY OF RENAL MEDULLARY PYRAMIDAL THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS ON THE FIRST AND SECOND POSTNATAL ULTRASOUND IN INFANTS WITH CONGENITAL HYDRONEPHROSIS (2023, The Journal of Urology)

Lockwood frequently collaborates with several coauthors, reflecting a consistent engagement in specialized research communities. Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Douglas W. Storm (5 coauthored papers)
  • Christopher S. Cooper (4 coauthored papers)
  • Denise Juhr (2 coauthored papers)
  • Megan Bonnett (2 coauthored papers)
  • Linda S. Jacobson (1 coauthored paper)

The main publication venues for Lockwood's work feature:

  • The Journal of Urology (5 publications)
  • Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery (1 publication)
  • Urology (1 publication)

Their primary fields of study are Medicine and Engineering. Within these, the subfields include Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health; Urology; Automotive Engineering; Rheumatology; and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The range of main research topics addressed by Lockwood encompasses:

  • Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
  • Vehicle Emissions and Performance
  • Veterinary Oncology Research
  • Microbial Infections and Disease Research
  • Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
  • Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare

Best Publications

  • Quantitative Classification of Mammographic Densities and Breast Cancer Risk: Results From the Canadian National Breast Screening Study

    N. F. Boyd;J. W. Byng;R. A. Jong;E. K. Fishell

  • Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk.

    Norman F. Boyd;Gina A. Lockwood;Jeff W. Byng;David L. Tritchler

  • High-level coexpression of JAG1 and NOTCH1 is observed in human breast cancer and is associated with poor overall survival.

    Michael Reedijk;Silvia Odorcic;Lynn Chang;Hui Zhang

  • Combined T2-Weighted and Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Localization of Prostate Cancer

    Masoom A. Haider;Theodorus H. van der Kwast;Jeff Tanguay;Andrew J. Evans

  • Phase I Study of Individualized Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

    Regina V. Tse;Maria Hawkins;Gina Lockwood;John J. Kim

  • Cancer patients: their desire for information and participation in treatment decisions.

    H J Sutherland;H A Llewellyn-Thomas;G A Lockwood;D L Tritchler

  • Phase I Study of Individualized Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Liver Metastases

    Mark T. Lee;John J. Kim;Robert Dinniwell;James Brierley

  • Predictive value of tumor thickness for cervical lymph-node involvement in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: a meta-analysis of reported studies.

    Shao Hui Huang;David Hwang;Gina Lockwood;David P. Goldstein

  • A randomized controlled trial of the effects of group psychological therapy on survival in women with metastatic breast cancer

    A.J. Cunningham;C.V.I. Edmonds;G.P. Jenkins;H. Pollack

  • Glypican-3-deficient mice exhibit developmental overgrowth and some of the abnormalities typical of Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome

    Danielle F. Cano-Gauci;Danielle F. Cano-Gauci;Howard H. Song;Howard H. Song;Huiling Yang;Huiling Yang;Colin McKerlie

  • A relationship between perceived self-efficacy and quality of life in cancer patients.

    Alastair J. Cunningham;Gina A. Lockwood;John A. Cunningham

  • A meta-analysis of studies of dietary fat and breast cancer risk

    N F Boyd;L J Martin;M Noffel;G A Lockwood

  • Chemical shift MR imaging of hyperattenuating (>10 HU) adrenal masses: does it still have a role?

    Masoom A. Haider;Sangeet Ghai;Kartik Jhaveri;Gina Lockwood

  • Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms.

    J W Byng;M J Yaffe;R A Jong;R S Shumak

  • Effects at Two Years of a Low-Fat, High-Carbohydrate Diet on Radiologic Features of the Breast: Results From a Randomized Trial

    Norman F. Boyd;Cary Greenberg;Gina Lockwood;Laurie Little

  • Prevalence of Prostate Cancer on Autopsy: Cross-Sectional Study on Unscreened Caucasian and Asian Men

    Alexandre R. Zlotta;Shin Egawa;Dmitry Pushkar;Alexander Govorov

  • Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for localization of recurrent prostate cancer after external beam radiotherapy.

    Masoom A. Haider;Peter Chung;Joan Sweet;Ants Toi

  • The risk of breast cancer associated with mammographic parenchymal patterns: a meta-analysis of the published literature to examine the effect of method of classification.

    E Warner;G Lockwood;D Tritchler;N F Boyd

  • Differences in cancer awareness and beliefs between Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): do they contribute to differences in cancer survival?

    L. J. L. Forbes;A. E. Simon;F. Warburton;D. Boniface

  • High-level JAG1 mRNA and protein predict poor outcome in breast cancer

    Brendan C Dickson;Anna Marie Mulligan;Hui Zhang;Gina Lockwood

Frequent Co-Authors

Laura A. Dawson
Laura A. Dawson Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Norman F. Boyd
Norman F. Boyd Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Bernard Cummings
Bernard Cummings Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Neil Fleshner
Neil Fleshner Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Padraig Warde
Padraig Warde Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Brian O'Sullivan
Brian O'Sullivan Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Charles Catton
Charles Catton University of Toronto
Antonio Finelli
Antonio Finelli University Health Network
Martin J. Yaffe
Martin J. Yaffe University of Toronto
James E. Till
James E. Till Ontario Institute for Cancer Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Medicine in the USA opens the door to a broad range of related online degrees and career opportunities in healthcare. Online programs offer flexibility for students and working professionals who want to advance their expertise or specialize further. For example, those interested in food science and wellness can explore online nutrition degrees to launch or upgrade a career in nutrition and dietetics.

For individuals aspiring to move into healthcare administration, enrolling in online mha programs cahme accredited provides the essential leadership and management skills needed for high-level healthcare roles. Nurses looking to advance can benefit from rn to bsn online with no clinicals options, offering a flexible route to expand their qualifications—often without additional hands-on clinical requirements.

Those aiming for the highest levels of nursing practice may consider dnp programs online, which prepare graduates for leadership, research, or advanced clinical positions. These pathways support the evolving needs of the US healthcare system and offer versatile routes to meaningful and impactful careers.

Best Scientists Citing Gina Lockwood

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles