World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
31
Citations
3216
World Ranking
3387
National Ranking
78

James M. McCaw publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. McCaw sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 170 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

James M. McCaw D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. McCaw sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Altered temporal response of malaria parasites determines differential sensitivity to artemisinin.

    Nectarios Klonis;Stanley C. Xie;James M. McCaw;Maria P. Crespo-Ortiz

  • A Biological Model for Influenza Transmission: Pandemic Planning Implications of Asymptomatic Infection and Immunity

    John D. Mathews;Christopher T. McCaw;Jodie McVernon;Emma S. McBryde;Emma S. McBryde

  • Key questions for modelling COVID-19 exit strategies.

    Robin N. Thompson;Robin N. Thompson;Robin N. Thompson;T. Déirdre Hollingsworth;Valerie Isham;Daniel Arribas-Bel;Daniel Arribas-Bel

  • Infectious disease pandemic planning and response: Incorporating decision analysis

    Freya M. Shearer;Robert Moss;Jodie McVernon;Jodie McVernon;Joshua V. Ross

  • Understanding influenza transmission, immunity and pandemic threats

    John D. Mathews;Joanne M. Chesson;James M. McCaw;Jodie McVernon

  • Early analysis of the Australian COVID-19 epidemic.

    David J Price;Freya M Shearer;Michael T Meehan;Emma McBryde

  • Synthetic Population Dynamics: A Model of Household Demography

    Nicholas Geard;James McCaw;Alan Dorin;Kevin Burt Korb

  • Prophylaxis or treatment? Optimal use of an antiviral stockpile during an influenza pandemic.

    James M. McCaw;Jodie McVernon;Jodie McVernon

  • Assessing the Viral Fitness of Oseltamivir-Resistant Influenza Viruses in Ferrets, Using a Competitive-Mixtures Model

    Aeron C. Hurt;Siti Sarah Nor'e;James M. McCaw;Helen R. Fryer

  • Prior immunity helps to explain wave-like behaviour of pandemic influenza in 1918-9

    John D Mathews;Emma S McBryde;Jodie McVernon;Paul K Pallaghy

  • Modelling the impact of COVID-19 in Australia to inform transmission reducing measures and health system preparedness

    Robert Moss;James Wood;Damien Brown;Freya Shearer

  • Investigating the Efficacy of Triple Artemisinin-Based Combination Therapies for Treating Plasmodium falciparum Malaria Patients Using Mathematical Modeling.

    Saber Dini;Sophie Zaloumis;Pengxing Cao;Ric N. Price;Ric N. Price

  • Impact of Emerging Antiviral Drug Resistance on Influenza Containment and Spread: Influence of Subclinical Infection and Strategic Use of a Stockpile Containing One or Two Drugs

    James M. McCaw;James G. Wood;James G. Wood;Christopher T. McCaw;Jodie McVernon

  • Innate Immunity and the Inter-exposure Interval Determine the Dynamics of Secondary Influenza Virus Infection and Explain Observed Viral Hierarchies

    Pengxing Cao;Ada W. C. Yan;Jane Marie Heffernan;Stephen Petrie

  • The effects of demographic change on disease transmission and vaccine impact in a household structured population.

    Nicholas Geard;Nicholas Geard;Kathryn Glass;James M. McCaw;Emma S. McBryde

  • Comparison of three methods for ascertainment of contact information relevant to respiratory pathogen transmission in encounter networks

    James M McCaw;Kristian Forbes;Paula M Nathan;Philippa E Pattison

  • Characterising pandemic severity and transmissibility from data collected during first few hundred studies.

    Andrew J Black;Nicholas Geard;James M McCaw;Jodie McVernon

  • Influencing public health policy with data-informed mathematical models of infectious diseases: Recent developments and new challenges.

    Amani Alahmadi;Sarah Belet;Andrew Black;Deborah Cromer

  • Forecasting influenza outbreak dynamics in Melbourne from Internet search query surveillance data

    Robert Moss;Alexander Zarebski;Peter Dawson;James M. McCaw;James M. McCaw

  • Coronavirus Disease Model to Inform Transmission -Reducing Measures and Health System Preparedness, Australia

    Robert Moss;James Wood;Damien Brown;Freya M Shearer

Frequent Co-Authors

Julie A. Simpson
Julie A. Simpson University of Melbourne
Freya J. I. Fowkes
Freya J. I. Fowkes Burnet Institute
Ric N. Price
Ric N. Price Charles Darwin University
Ian G. Barr
Ian G. Barr University of Melbourne
Aeron C. Hurt
Aeron C. Hurt Roche (Switzerland)
Anne Kelso
Anne Kelso University of Melbourne
David Price
David Price University of Aberdeen
Nicole L. La Gruta
Nicole L. La Gruta Monash University
Leann Tilley
Leann Tilley University of Melbourne
Thomas A. House
Thomas A. House University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing a Mathematics degree in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many opt for an MBA to enhance their leadership skills, and if you're considering this path, it's useful to know that some programs allow you to can you transfer mba programs credits, making the transition smoother and more flexible.

Specializations like data analytics have gained immense popularity. A data analytics master's degree complements a math background, equipping graduates with skills highly sought after in industries like finance, healthcare, and technology.

For those seeking a simpler entry into business education, exploring the easiest mba specialization can be a practical choice to build managerial acumen without overwhelming competitive admissions. Similarly, the easiest online mba programs provide accessible options for working professionals looking to balance studies with other commitments.

Combining mathematics with such degrees expands career pathways in analytics, consulting, finance, and beyond. Online formats add valuable flexibility, allowing learners to advance their education while managing their personal and professional lives effectively.

Best Scientists Citing James M. McCaw