World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
37
Citations
6270
World Ranking
2484
National Ranking
164

Thomas A. House publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas A. House sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 149 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Thomas A. House D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas A. House sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Modeling infectious disease dynamics in the complex landscape of global health.

    Hans Heesterbeek;Roy M. Anderson;Viggo Andreasen;Shweta Bansal

  • Effect of Delta variant on viral burden and vaccine effectiveness against new SARS-CoV-2 infections in the UK.

    Koen B. Pouwels;Koen B. Pouwels;Emma Pritchard;Emma Pritchard;Philippa C. Matthews;Philippa C. Matthews;Philippa C. Matthews;Nicole Stoesser

  • Impact of vaccination on new SARS-CoV-2 infections in the United Kingdom.

    Emma Pritchard;Emma Pritchard;Philippa C. Matthews;Philippa C. Matthews;Nicole Stoesser;David W. Eyre

  • Eight challenges for network epidemic models.

    Lorenzo Pellis;Frank Ball;Shweta Bansal;Ken T. D. Eames

  • Insights from unifying modern approximations to infections on networks

    Thomas A. House;Matthew James Keeling

  • Community prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in England from April to November, 2020: results from the ONS Coronavirus Infection Survey.

    K B Pouwels;K B Pouwels;T House;T House;E Pritchard;E Pritchard;J V Robotham

  • Individual identity and movement networks for disease metapopulations.

    Matthew James Keeling;Leon Danon;Leon Danon;Matthew C. Vernon;Thomas A. House

  • Challenges in control of COVID-19: short doubling time and long delay to effect of interventions

    Lorenzo Pellis;Francesca Scarabel;Helena B Stage;Christopher E Overton

  • Hospital length of stay for COVID-19 patients: Data-driven methods for forward planning.

    Bindu Vekaria;Bindu Vekaria;Christopher Overton;Christopher Overton;Arkadiusz Wiśniowski;Shazaad Ahmad

  • Social encounter networks: collective properties and disease transmission

    Leon Danon;Thomas A. House;Jonathan M. Read;Matthew James Keeling

  • Seven challenges for metapopulation models of epidemics, including households models

    Frank Ball;Tom Britton;Thomas A. House;Valerie Isham

  • Social encounter networks: characterizing Great Britain

    Leon Danon;Jonathan M. Read;Thomas A. House;Matthew C. Vernon;Matthew C. Vernon

  • Impact of spatial clustering on disease transmission and optimal control

    Michael J. Tildesley;Thomas A. House;Mark C. Bruhn;Ross J. Curry

  • Household structure and infectious disease transmission

    Thomas A. House;Matthew James Keeling

  • Tracking the Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 Alpha Variant in the United Kingdom

    Unknown

  • Deterministic epidemic models with explicit household structure.

    Thomas A. House;Matthew James Keeling

  • Key questions for modelling COVID-19 exit strategies.

    Robin N. Thompson;Robin N. Thompson;Robin N. Thompson;T. Déirdre Hollingsworth;Valerie Isham;Daniel Arribas-Bel;Daniel Arribas-Bel

  • Impact of Delta on viral burden and vaccine effectiveness against new SARS-CoV-2 infections in the UK

    K B Pouwels;K B Pouwels;E Pritchard;E Pritchard;P C Matthews;P C Matthews;P C Matthews;N Stoesser

  • Possible future waves of SARS-CoV-2 infection generated by variants of concern with a range of characteristics.

    Louise Dyson;Edward M. Hill;Sam Moore;Jacob Curran-Sebastian

  • Challenges in control of Covid-19: short doubling time and long delay to effect of interventions

    Lorenzo Pellis;Francesca Scarabel;Francesca Scarabel;Helena B. Stage;Christopher E. Overton

Frequent Co-Authors

Philippa C. Matthews
Philippa C. Matthews University of Oxford
Ian P. Hall
Ian P. Hall University of Nottingham
Jeremy Farrar
Jeremy Farrar World Health Organization
Nicole Stoesser
Nicole Stoesser University of Oxford
John I. Bell
John I. Bell Ellison Institute of Technology
David W. Eyre
David W. Eyre University of Oxford
Graham F. Medley
Graham F. Medley London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Tim E. A. Peto
Tim E. A. Peto University of Oxford
A. Sarah Walker
A. Sarah Walker University of Oxford
Frances Griffiths
Frances Griffiths University of Warwick

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Mathematics in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways, often enhanced by complementary online degrees. For professionals seeking leadership roles, pursuing the cheapest aacsb online dba programs can offer a strategic advantage with a focus on data-driven decision-making and business analytics.

Financial acumen is another valuable skill set. Combining mathematical expertise with the cheapest online masters in finance prepares graduates for high-demand roles in investment, risk management, and financial modeling.

For those aiming to accelerate their career trajectory, the fastest mba programs online provide a flexible, time-efficient route to leadership roles, blending analytical skills with business strategy knowledge.

Marketing is also an evolving field where mathematical skills are highly prized. Students interested in this area can benefit from the marketing masters that offer affordability, strong earning potential, and practical analytical training.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas A. House

Recently Published Articles