World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Nathalie Leresche

Nathalie Leresche

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
39
Citations
6422
World Ranking
8309
National Ranking
384

Nathalie Leresche publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathalie Leresche sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 75 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Nathalie Leresche D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathalie Leresche sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nathalie Leresche is affiliated with Sorbonne University in France. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily within the fields of Medicine, Neuroscience, and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. The scientist's work notably addresses subfields such as Physiology, Molecular Biology, Neurology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

Their research topics focus on Pain Mechanisms and Treatments, Ion Channel Regulation and Function, Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders, Epilepsy Research and Treatment, Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research, and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces.

Frequent co-authors in their collaborative work include:

  • Régis C. Lambert
  • Sophie L. Fayad
  • Guillaume Ourties
  • Benjamin Le Gac
  • Baptiste Jouffre

Key recent publications by Nathalie Leresche comprise:

  • Clinical and experimental insight into pathophysiology, comorbidity and therapy of absence seizures, 2020, Brain
  • Centrally expressed Cav3.2 T-type calcium channel is critical for the initiation and maintenance of neuropathic pain, 2022, eLife
  • Centrally expressed Cav3.2 T-type calcium channel is critical for the initiation and maintenance of neuropathic pain, 2022, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

The venues where Nathalie has published include:

  • Brain
  • eLife
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Best Publications

  • Childhood absence epilepsy: genes, channels, neurons and networks.

    Vincenzo Crunelli;Nathalie Leresche

  • Calcium entry increases the sensitivity of cerebellar Purkinje cells to applied GABA and decreases inhibitory synaptic currents

    I. Llano;N. Leresche;A. Marty

  • A role for GABAB receptors in excitation and inhibition of thalamocortical cells.

    Vincenzo Crunelli;Nathalie Leresche

  • Intracellular recordings in thalamic neurones during spontaneous spike and wave discharges in rats with absence epilepsy

    Didier Pinault;Nathalie Leresche;Stéphane Charpier;Jean-Michel Deniau

  • Essential Thalamic Contribution to Slow Waves of Natural Sleep

    François David;Joscha T. Schmiedt;Joscha T. Schmiedt;Hannah L. Taylor;Gergely Orban

  • Selective T-Type Calcium Channel Block in Thalamic Neurons Reveals Channel Redundancy and Physiological Impact of ITwindow

    Fanny M Dreyfus;Anne Tscherter;Adam C Errington;John J Renger

  • On the Action of the Anti-Absence Drug Ethosuximide in the Rat and Cat Thalamus

    Nathalie Leresche;H. Rheinallt Parri;Gül Erdemli;Alice Guyon

  • Cl‐ ‐ and K+‐dependent inhibitory postsynaptic potentials evoked by interneurones of the rat lateral geniculate nucleus.

    V Crunelli;M Haby;D Jassik-Gerschenfeld;N Leresche

  • Cortical-area specific block of genetically determined absence seizures by ethosuximide

    J. P. A. Manning;D. A. Richards;N Leresche;Vincenzo Crunelli

  • Clinical and experimental insight into pathophysiology, comorbidity and therapy of absence seizures

    Vincenzo Crunelli;Vincenzo Crunelli;Magor L Lőrincz;Magor L Lőrincz;Cian McCafferty;Régis C Lambert

  • Activity of Thalamic Reticular Neurons during Spontaneous Genetically Determined Spike and Wave Discharges

    Seán J. Slaght;Nathalie Leresche;Jean-Michel Deniau;Vincenzo Crunelli

  • Unravelling the brain targets of γ-hydroxybutyric acid

    Vincenzo Crunelli;Zsuzsa Emri;Nathalie Leresche

  • Dual function of thalamic low-vigilance state oscillations: rhythm-regulation and plasticity.

    Vincenzo Crunelli;Vincenzo Crunelli;Magor L. Lőrincz;William M. Connelly;François David

  • Cortical drive and thalamic feed-forward inhibition control thalamic output synchrony during absence seizures

    Cian McCafferty;Cian McCafferty;François David;François David;Marcello Venzi;Magor L Lőrincz

  • The GABAB antagonist phaclofen inhibits the late K+-dependent IPSP in cat and rat thalamic and hippocampal neurones.

    Ivan Soltesz;Matthias Haby;Nathalie Leresche;Vincenzo Crunelli

  • Pacemaker-like and other types of spontaneous membrane potential oscillations of thalamocortical cells

    Nathalie Leresche;Dora Jassik-Gerschenfeld;Matthias Haby;Ivan Soltesz

  • From sleep spindles of natural sleep to spike and wave discharges of typical absence seizures: is the hypothesis still valid?

    Nathalie Leresche;Régis C. Lambert;Régis C. Lambert;Adam Clarke Errington;Vincenzo Crunelli

  • Live imaging of neural structure and function by fibred fluorescence microscopy

    Pierre Vincent;Pierre Vincent;Uwe Maskos;Igor Charvet;Laurence Bourgeais;Laurence Bourgeais

  • On the putative contribution of GABAB receptors to the electrical events occuring during spontaneous spike and wave discharges

    Stéphane Charpier;Nathalie Leresche;Jean-Michel Deniau;Séverine Mahon

  • On the excitatory post‐synaptic potential evoked by stimulation of the optic tract in the rat lateral geniculate nucleus.

    Unknown

  • T-Type Calcium Channels Consolidate Tonic Action Potential Output of Thalamic Neurons to Neocortex

    Charlotte Deleuze;François David;Sébastien Béhuret;Gérard Sadoc

Frequent Co-Authors

Vincenzo Crunelli
Vincenzo Crunelli Cardiff University
Giuseppe Di Giovanni
Giuseppe Di Giovanni Magna Graecia University
John J. Renger
John J. Renger MSD (United States)
Stuart W. Hughes
Stuart W. Hughes Vertex Pharmaceuticals (United States)
Norman G. Bowery
Norman G. Bowery University of Birmingham
Hee-Sup Shin
Hee-Sup Shin Institute for Basic Science
Thierry Bal
Thierry Bal Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Stephen R. Williams
Stephen R. Williams University of Queensland
Ivan Soltesz
Ivan Soltesz Stanford University
Sara J. Aton
Sara J. Aton University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Neuroscience often explore a variety of online degrees and career options that complement or expand their expertise. For those seeking to advance their practice in mental health, programs like psyd psychology online offer flexible, high-quality doctoral education oriented toward clinical practice and leadership roles.

Careers in therapy are also a popular pathway. Accelerated options such as online marriage and family therapy programs allow students to begin impacting clients’ lives sooner, with coursework designed for working professionals.

For those seeking a quicker start, an accelerated bachelor's degree online accredited may be an efficient route—especially for students who want to enter the neuroscience or health sciences workforce rapidly.

Notably, pursuing one of the best degrees in the world in a related field can open doors to high-paying and impactful positions in healthcare, research, technology, and beyond. Evaluating each program’s accreditation, career outcomes, and compatibility with personal goals is key to success in this dynamic sector.

Best Scientists Citing Nathalie Leresche

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles