World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
57
Citations
10630
World Ranking
4374
National Ranking
1979

John J. Renger publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John J. Renger sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 174 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

John J. Renger D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John J. Renger sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

John J. Renger is affiliated with MSD in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and neuroscience. Their work spans several interconnected fields including molecular biology, experimental and cognitive psychology, psychiatry and mental health, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and cognitive neuroscience.

The scientist's primary research topics encompass receptor mechanisms and signaling, sleep and wakefulness research, sleep and related disorders, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors study, schizophrenia research and treatment, urinary bladder and prostate research, and metabolism and genetic disorders.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with John J. Renger include Sridhar Duvvuri, Ih Chang, Raymond Sanchez, Matthew Leoni, and David Gray.

They have published in a variety of scientific journals, with notable frequent venues being Neurology, IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology CITE, The Lancet, Journal of Clinical Investigation, and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Recent significant papers include:

  • Emraclidine, a novel positive allosteric modulator of cholinergic M4 receptors, for the treatment of schizophrenia: a two-part, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1b trial (2022, The Lancet)
  • Parkinson disease among patients treated for benign prostatic hyperplasia with α1 adrenergic receptor antagonists (2021, Journal of Clinical Investigation)
  • A Comparative Study on the Lysosomal Cation Channel TMEM175 Using Automated Whole-Cell Patch-Clamp, Lysosomal Patch-Clamp, and Solid Supported Membrane-Based Electrophysiology: Functional Characterization and High-Throughput Screening Assay Development (2023, International Journal of Molecular Sciences)
  • PET imaging of M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in rhesus macaques using [11C]MK-6884: Quantification with kinetic modeling and receptor occupancy by CVL-231 (emraclidine), a novel positive allosteric modulator (2024, Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism)
  • Orexin receptors in GtoPdb v.2021.3 (2021, IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology CITE)

Best Publications

  • Improved stability of Drosophila larval neuromuscular preparations in haemolymph-like physiological solutions.

    B A Stewart;H L Atwood;H L Atwood;J J Renger;J Wang

  • Discovery of the Dual Orexin Receptor Antagonist [(7R)-4-(5-Chloro-1,3-benzoxazol-2-yl)-7-methyl-1,4-diazepan-1-yl][5-methyl-2-(2H-1,2,3-triazol-2-yl)phenyl]methanone (MK-4305) for the Treatment of Insomnia

    Christopher D. Cox;Michael J. Breslin;David B. Whitman;John D. Schreier

  • Promotion of Sleep by Suvorexant—A Novel Dual Orexin Receptor Antagonist

    Christopher J Winrow;Anthony L Gotter;Christopher D Cox;Scott M Doran

  • A Developmental Switch in Neurotransmitter Flux Enhances Synaptic Efficacy by Affecting AMPA Receptor Activation

    John J Renger;Christophe Egles;Guosong Liu

  • Essential Thalamic Contribution to Slow Waves of Natural Sleep

    François David;Joscha T. Schmiedt;Joscha T. Schmiedt;Hannah L. Taylor;Gergely Orban

  • Internalized Tau Oligomers Cause Neurodegeneration by Inducing Accumulation of Pathogenic Tau in Human Neurons Derived from Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.

    Marija Usenovic;Shahriar Niroomand;Robert E. Drolet;Lihang Yao

  • Selective T-Type Calcium Channel Block in Thalamic Neurons Reveals Channel Redundancy and Physiological Impact of ITwindow

    Fanny M Dreyfus;Anne Tscherter;Adam C Errington;John J Renger

  • Presynaptic HCN1 channels regulate Cav3.2 activity and neurotransmission at select cortical synapses.

    Zhuo Huang;Rafael Lujan;Ivan Kadurin;Victor N Uebele

  • Presynaptic Cav3.2 channels regulate excitatory neurotransmission in nociceptive dorsal horn neurons.

    Megan O. Jacus;Victor N. Uebele;John J. Renger;Slobodan M. Todorovic

  • A sensitive aβ oligomer assay discriminates Alzheimer's and aged control cerebrospinal fluid.

    Mary J Savage;Juliya Kalinina;Abigail Wolfe;Katherine Tugusheva

  • International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXXVI. Orexin Receptor Function, Nomenclature and Pharmacology

    Anthony L. Gotter;Andrea L. Webber;Paul J. Coleman;John J. Renger

  • Discovery of [(2R,5R)-5-{[(5-Fluoropyridin-2-yl)oxy]methyl}-2-methylpiperidin-1-yl][5-methyl-2-(pyrimidin-2-yl)phenyl]methanone (MK-6096): A Dual Orexin Receptor Antagonist with Potent Sleep-Promoting Properties

    Paul J. Coleman;John D. Schreier;Christopher D. Cox;Michael J. Breslin

  • Discovery and development of orexin receptor antagonists as therapeutics for insomnia

    C J Winrow;J J Renger

  • Pharmacological characterization of MK-6096 - a dual orexin receptor antagonist for insomnia.

    Christopher J. Winrow;Anthony L. Gotter;Christopher D. Cox;Pamela L. Tannenbaum

  • Structure and ligand-binding mechanism of the human OX1 and OX2 orexin receptors

    Jie Yin;Kerim Babaoglu;Chad A Brautigam;Lindsay Clark

  • Design, synthesis, and evaluation of a novel 4-aminomethyl-4-fluoropiperidine as a T-type Ca2+ channel antagonist.

    William D. Shipe;James C. Barrow;Zhi Qiang Yang;Craig W. Lindsley;Craig W. Lindsley

  • The Discovery of Suvorexant, the First Orexin Receptor Drug for Insomnia

    Paul J. Coleman;Anthony L. Gotter;W. Joseph Herring;Christopher J. Winrow

  • Discovery of a 3-(4-Pyrimidinyl) Indazole (MLi-2), an Orally Available and Selective Leucine-Rich Repeat Kinase 2 (LRRK2) Inhibitor that Reduces Brain Kinase Activity.

    Jack D. Scott;Duane E. DeMong;Thomas J. Greshock;Kallol Basu

  • Calcineurin Signaling Mediates Activity-Dependent Relocation of the Axon Initial Segment

    Mark D. Evans;Rosanna P. Sammons;Sabrina Lebron;Adna S. Dumitrescu

  • Knocking the NT4 gene into the BDNF locus rescues BDNF deficient mice and reveals distinct NT4 and BDNF activities

    Guoping Fan;Christophe Egles;Yi Sun;Liliana Minichiello

  • Role of cAMP Cascade in Synaptic Stability and Plasticity: Ultrastructural and Physiological Analyses of Individual Synaptic Boutons in Drosophila Memory Mutants

    John J. Renger;Atsushi Ueda;Harold L. Atwood;Harold L. Atwood;C. K. Govind

Frequent Co-Authors

Jason M. Uslaner
Jason M. Uslaner MSD (United States)
George D. Hartman
George D. Hartman Janssen (Belgium)
Fred W. Turek
Fred W. Turek Northwestern University
Richard Hargreaves
Richard Hargreaves Harvard Medical School
Martha Hotz Vitaterna
Martha Hotz Vitaterna Northwestern University
Chun-Fang Wu
Chun-Fang Wu University of Iowa
Craig W. Lindsley
Craig W. Lindsley Vanderbilt University
Nathalie Leresche
Nathalie Leresche Sorbonne University
Vincenzo Crunelli
Vincenzo Crunelli Cardiff University
Thomas W. Rosahl
Thomas W. Rosahl MSD (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When considering a future in neuroscience, it's wise to look at related degree options and career paths accessible through online study. Fields such as biomedical engineering, psychology, and computer science are among college majors that make the most money and often overlap with neuroscience in both methods and research areas.

For those seeking flexibility and affordability, many students explore online colleges that provide robust programs and accept federal financial aid. This makes it easier to manage educational expenses while pursuing your goals.

Career advancement can also come from short-term options, such as earning what certificates can i get online in fields like data analysis, neuroscience technology, or healthcare management. These credentials can quickly boost your employment opportunities in neuroscience-adjacent roles.

If you're prioritizing ease and speed, there are easy university majors available online that provide a pathway into supporting roles in neuroscience and related sciences. Exploring these avenues ensures you find a route that aligns with your personal and professional objectives.

Best Scientists Citing John J. Renger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles