World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 75 19119 17955 1724 1652 363 20766

Ian D. Cooke publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ian D. Cooke between 1966 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ian D. Cooke published across 59 years, from 1966 to 2024, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 1992. 5 of the 372 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1966 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 1992. 1966: 1 publication 1967: 1 publication 1968: 0 publications 1969: 2 publications 1970: 2 publications 1971: 3 publications 1972: 5 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 4 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 6 publications 1977: 6 publications 1978: 10 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 6 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 17 publications 1989: 19 publications 1990: 23 publications 1991: 19 publications 1992: 26 publications 1993: 23 publications 1994: 22 publications 1995: 19 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 21 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 16 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication 2018: 3 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 3 publications
1966 2024

372 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ian D. Cooke: publications per year, 1966 to 2024
Year Publications
1966 1
1967 1
1968 0
1969 2
1970 2
1971 3
1972 5
1973 2
1974 4
1975 1
1976 6
1977 6
1978 10
1979 3
1980 2
1981 5
1982 4
1983 6
1984 4
1985 3
1986 4
1987 6
1988 17
1989 19
1990 23
1991 19
1992 26
1993 23
1994 22
1995 19
1996 11
1997 21
1998 9
1999 16
2000 15
2001 7
2002 3
2003 7
2004 4
2005 0
2006 0
2007 2
2008 4
2009 6
2010 0
2011 1
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 1
2016 1
2017 1
2018 3
2019 0
2020 2
2021 3
2022 2
2023 2
2024 3
Total 372
Download as CSV

Ian D. Cooke publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian D. Cooke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 361–380 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 363 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838 363
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Ian D. Cooke D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian D. Cooke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574 75
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ian D. Cooke is affiliated with the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom. Their research contributions span several interdisciplinary fields, including visual arts, performing arts, speech and hearing, sociology and political science, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, as well as pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

Their work primarily explores topics related to comics and graphic narratives, digital storytelling and education, digital games and media, renal cell carcinoma treatment, pediatric urology and nephrology studies, urological disorders and treatments, and web data mining and analysis.

Frequent collaborators in their research include Stella Wisdom, Linda Berube, Ernesto Priego, Stephann Makri, and Samiha Sadruddin. This network highlights a diversity of engagement within their fields of study.

Ian D. Cooke has published in various venues, with multiple contributions to the New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia and Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). Other publication venues include Human Fertility and The Journal of Urology.

Their recent papers include:

  • "Let there be life: an intimate portrait of Robert Edwards and his IVF revolution" (2020) in Human Fertility
  • "Moving with the story": the haptics of reader experience and response to digital comics (2024) in New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia
  • MP49-06 A HELPFUL TOOL IN THE RENAL SURGERY ARMAMENTARIUM: DORSAL LUMBOTOMY NEPHRECTOMY FOR TUMOR IN PATIENTS WITH END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE (2021) in The Journal of Urology
  • DigiSpec: Scoping Future Born-Digital Data Services for the Arts and Humanities: Case Reports (2022) in Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • UK Digital Comics: Challenges and Opportunities of a Collaborative Doctoral Partnership. A Co-designed Comic Poster (2023) in Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

These publications reflect a focus on both medical and digital media topics, highlighting an interdisciplinary approach linking health sciences with digital technology and visual arts.

Best Publications

  • The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care, 2017

    Fernando Zegers-Hochschild;G. David Adamson;Silke Dyer;Catherine Racowsky

  • Infertility and the provision of infertility medical services in developing countries

    Willem Ombelet;Ian Cooke;Silke Dyer;Gamal Serour

  • The septate uterus: a review of management and reproductive outcome

    Hayden A Homer;Tin-Chiu Li;Ian D Cooke

  • Peritoneal healing and adhesion formation/reformation

    Y. C. Cheong;S. M. Laird;T. C. Li;J. B. Shelton

  • A double-blind randomized placebo cross-over controlled trial using the antioxidant vitamin E to treat reactive oxygen species associated male infertility*†

    Efrossini Kessopoulou;Hillary J. Powers;Khawam K. Sharma;Michael J. Pearson

  • The role of T-helper cytokines in human reproduction

    Kelvin J.H Lim;Olusegun A Odukoya;Ramzi A Ajjan;Tin-Chiu Li

  • The effect of age on the cyclical patterns of plasma LH, FSH, oestradiol and progesterone in women with regular menstrual cycles

    S.J. Lee;E.A. Lenton;L. Sexton;I.D. Cooke

  • An assessment of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in labor. A randomized trial.

    Ian M. Kelso;R.John Parsons;Gordon F. Lawrence;Shyam S. Arora

  • Origin of reactive oxygen species in human semen: spermatozoa or leucocytes?

    E. Kessopoulou;M. J. Tomlinson;C. L. R. Barratt;A. E. Bolton

  • Prospective study of leukocytes and leukocyte subpopulations in semen suggests they are not a cause of male infertility

    Mathew James Tomlinson;Christopher Lowther Robert Barratt;Ian Douglas Cooke

  • Progressive changes in LH and FSH and LH: FSH ratio in women throughout reproductive life

    E.A. Lenton;L. Sexton;S. Lee;I.D. Cooke

  • The impact of infertility on psychological functioning

    Kevin J. Connolly;Robert J. Edelmann;Ian D. Cooke;Jill Robson

  • The removal of morphologically abnormal sperm forms by phagocytes: a positive role for seminal leukocytes?

    M.J. Tomlinson;A. White;C.L.R. Barratt;A.E. Bolton

  • Sperm numbers and distribution within the human fallopian tube around ovulation

    M. Williams;C.J. Hill;I. Scudamore;B. Dunphy

  • Prognostic significance of computerized motility analysis for in vivo fertility

    Christopher Lowther Robert Barratt;Mathew James Tomlinson;Ian Douglas Cooke

  • Functional significance of white blood cells in the male and female reproductive tract

    C.L.R. Barratt;A.E. Bolton;I.D. Cooke

  • A Prospective Study of Multiple Needle Biopsies Versus a Single Open Biopsy for Testicular Sperm Extraction in Men With Non-Obstructive Azoospermia

    U.I.O. Ezeh;H.D.M. Moore;I.D. Cooke

  • Long term follow-up of patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome after laparoscopic ovarian drilling: Clinical outcome

    S. A. K. Amer;V. Gopalan;T. C. Li;W. L. Ledger

  • The Usefulness of Ultrasound Assessment of Amniotic Fluid in Predicting Adverse Outcome in Prolonged Pregnancy: A Prospective Blinded Observational Study

    J. M. Morris;K. Thompson;J. Smithey;G. Gaffney

  • FACTORS AFFECTING THE OUTCOME OF LAPAROSCOPIC OVARIAN DRILLING FOR POLYCYSTIC OVARIAN SYNDROME IN WOMEN WITH ANOVULATORY INFERTILITY

    T. C. Li;H. Saravelos;M. S. Chow;R. Chisabingo

Frequent Co-Authors

Tin-Chiu Li
Tin-Chiu Li Chinese University of Hong Kong
Christopher L.R. Barratt
Christopher L.R. Barratt University of Dundee
Harry Moore
Harry Moore University of Sheffield
Anthony P. Weetman
Anthony P. Weetman University of Sheffield
John D. Aplin
John D. Aplin University of Manchester
William J. Ledger
William J. Ledger University of New South Wales
Judith N. Bulmer
Judith N. Bulmer Newcastle University
Robert J. Edelmann
Robert J. Edelmann University of Roehampton
Angela Kaida
Angela Kaida Simon Fraser University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

With growing demand for healthcare professionals, online degrees offer flexible options for those interested in medical careers beyond the traditional MD route. One increasingly popular path is becoming a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner. If you're looking to enter this field quickly, programs like the fastest pmhnp program can help you earn qualifications at an accelerated pace.

For those interested in healthcare management, affordability and accessibility are important factors. You can find the cheapest mha programs online and explore the most affordable online mha programs to start or advance your career in healthcare administration without taking on significant debt.

Nursing professionals may also consider doctoral degrees to expand their clinical expertise and career options. The best online bsn to dnp programs make it possible to earn a respected terminal degree while balancing work and personal commitments.

Exploring these online options provides diverse pathways for those passionate about healthcare, leadership, or mental health. Whether pursuing an advanced degree or changing specialties, accredited online programs deliver flexibility and value for aspiring professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Ian D. Cooke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles