World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michiel C.J. Bliemer

Michiel C.J. Bliemer

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 40 7278 7023 374 369 214 7006

Michiel C.J. Bliemer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michiel C.J. Bliemer between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michiel C.J. Bliemer published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 9.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2008. 17 of the 279 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2008. 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 25 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 10 publications
1996 2025

279 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michiel C.J. Bliemer: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 2
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 2
2002 0
2003 1
2004 2
2005 13
2006 11
2007 8
2008 25
2009 15
2010 20
2011 13
2012 7
2013 10
2014 19
2015 14
2016 16
2017 14
2018 14
2019 17
2020 14
2021 12
2022 9
2023 3
2024 7
2025 10
Total 279
Download as CSV

Michiel C.J. Bliemer publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michiel C.J. Bliemer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 208–217 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 214 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317 214
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Michiel C.J. Bliemer D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michiel C.J. Bliemer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348 40
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Michiel C.J. Bliemer is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia. Their research spans several domains within engineering and social sciences, with a focus on transportation and control systems.

The scientist's recent publications include:

  • "The scientific literature on Coronaviruses, COVID-19 and its associated safety-related research dimensions: A scientometric analysis and scoping review" (2020, Safety Science)
  • "Consumer preferences for innovative and traditional last-mile parcel delivery" (2022, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management)
  • "Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part I. Macro-scale analysis of literature and integrative synthesis of empirical evidence from applied economics, experimental psychology and neuroimaging" (2021, Journal of Choice Modelling)
  • "The landscape of econometric discrete choice modelling research" (2021, Journal of Choice Modelling)
  • "Cooperate or not? Exploring drivers' interactions and response times to a lane-changing request in a connected environment" (2020, Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies)

Frequent co-authors working alongside the researcher include:

  • Milad Haghani
  • Mark P.H. Raadsen
  • Yasir Ali
  • Zuduo Zheng
  • Md. Mazharul Haque

Michiel C.J. Bliemer's publications predominantly appear in the following venues:

  • Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies
  • Transportation Research Part B Methodological
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Choice Modelling
  • Analytic Methods in Accident Research

The scientist's research fields are divided primarily between engineering and social sciences. Notable subfields include:

  • Transportation
  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Building and Construction

Key topics covered in their work are:

  • Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Traffic control and management
  • Traffic and Road Safety
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
  • Human-Automation Interaction and Safety

Best Publications

  • Constructing Efficient Stated Choice Experimental Designs

    John M. Rose;Michiel C. J. Bliemer

  • Designing efficient stated choice experiments in the presence of reference alternatives

    John M. Rose;Michiel C.J. Bliemer;Michiel C.J. Bliemer;David A. Hensher;Andrew T. Collins

  • A review on travel behaviour modelling in dynamic traffic simulation models for evacuations

    Adam J Pel;Michiel C J Bliemer;Serge Paul Hoogendoorn

  • Approximation of bayesian efficiency in experimental choice designs

    Michiel C.J. Bliemer;Michiel C.J. Bliemer;John M. Rose;Stephane Hess;Stephane Hess

  • Confidence intervals of willingness-to-pay for random coefficient logit models

    Michiel C.J. Bliemer;John M. Rose

  • Quasi-variational inequality formulation of the multiclass dynamic traffic assignment problem ☆

    Michiel C.J. Bliemer;Piet H.L. Bovy

  • Driver behaviour profiles for road safety analysis

    Adrian B. Ellison;Stephen P. Greaves;Michiel C.J. Bliemer

  • Dynamic Queuing and Spillback in Analytical Multiclass Dynamic Network Loading Model

    Michiel C J Bliemer

  • Impact of Route Choice Set on Route Choice Probabilities

    Michiel C J Bliemer;Piet H L Bovy

  • Consumer preferences for innovative and traditional last-mile parcel delivery

    Unknown

  • Optimal Toll Design Problem in Dynamic Traffic Networks with Joint Route and Departure Time Choice

    Dusica Joksimovic;Michiel C J Bliemer;Piet H L Bovy

  • Optimal Toll Design Problem in Dynamic Traffic Networks with Joint Route and Departure Time Choice

    Unknown

  • Genetics of traffic assignment models for strategic transport planning

    Michiel C. J. Bliemer;Mark P. H. Raadsen;Luuk J. N. Brederode;Michael G. H. Bell

  • Network science approach to modelling the topology and robustness of supply chain networks: a review and perspective

    Supun Perera;Michael G.H. Bell;Michiel C.J. Bliemer

  • Evacuation modeling including traveler information and compliance behavior

    Adam J Pel;Serge Paul Hoogendoorn;Michiel C J Bliemer

  • Pricing in road transport: A multi-disciplinary perspective

    E Verhoef;M Bliemer;Linda Steg;B. Van Wee

  • On determining priors for the generation of efficient stated choice experimental designs

    Michiel C.J. Bliemer;Andrew T. Collins

  • On including travel time reliability of road traffic in appraisal

    Gerard C. de Jong;Michiel C.J. Bliemer

  • Stated choice experimental design theory: the who, the what and the why

    John Rose;Michiel Bliemer

  • Network growth models: A behavioural basis for attachment proportional to fitness

    Michael G. H. Bell;Supun Perera;Mahendrarajah Piraveenan;Michiel C. J. Bliemer

  • New appraisal values of travel time saving and reliability in Great Britain

    Richard Batley;John Bates;Michiel Bliemer;Maria Börjesson

  • Constructing efficient choice experiments

    John M Rose;Michiel C. J. Bliemer

  • Cooperate or not? Exploring drivers’ interactions and response times to a lane-changing request in a connected environment

    Yasir Ali;Michiel C.J. Bliemer;Zuduo Zheng;Md. Mazharul Haque

  • Stop or go decisions at the onset of yellow light in a connected environment: A hybrid approach of decision tree and panel mixed logit model

    Yasir Ali;Yasir Ali;Md. Mazharul Haque;Zuduo Zheng;Michiel C.J. Bliemer

  • Genetics of traffic assignment models for strategic transport planning

    M.C.J. Bliemer;M.P.H. Raadsen;L.J.N. Brederode;M.G.H. Bell

Frequent Co-Authors

John M. Rose
John M. Rose University of Sydney
Michael G.H. Bell
Michael G.H. Bell University of Sydney
Piet H. L. Bovy
Piet H. L. Bovy Delft University of Technology
Serge P. Hoogendoorn
Serge P. Hoogendoorn Delft University of Technology
Stephane Hess
Stephane Hess University of Leeds
Emily Lancsar
Emily Lancsar Australian National University
David A. Hensher
David A. Hensher University of Sydney
Harmen Oppewal
Harmen Oppewal Monash University
Esther W. de Bekker-Grob
Esther W. de Bekker-Grob Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Engineering and Technology opens doors to a wide range of interdisciplinary opportunities. Many professionals choose to round out their technical expertise with skills in management, communications, or entrepreneurship. Earning an online degree in a related field can fast-track your progress, offering flexibility and affordability without putting your career on hold.

For those interested in leadership or human resources management, consider the cheapest online master's in human resources to develop essential people management skills. If you are drawn to conveying complex ideas or want to enhance your workplace communication abilities, an affordable online master's degree in communications can be a smart option.

Entrepreneurs or those looking to lead innovative projects can benefit greatly from an mba in entrepreneurship online program. Additionally, for professionals seeking senior business roles without traditional barriers, enrolling in top online mba programs no gmat streamlines the application process.

Combining technical know-how with these sought-after skills positions you for long-term career growth in today's rapidly changing tech landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Michiel C.J. Bliemer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles