World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
77
Citations
17212
World Ranking
18578
National Ranking
9254

Timothy P. Hofer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy P. Hofer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 250 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Timothy P. Hofer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy P. Hofer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Timothy P. Hofer is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on several key subfields including General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Genetics, Oncology, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The scientist's work covers a variety of topics, with significant attention to:

  • BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Timothy P. Hofer has contributed to multiple recent papers, including:

  • "Germline Genetic Testing After Cancer Diagnosis," 2023, published in JAMA
  • "Time Trends in Receipt of Germline Genetic Testing and Results for Women Diagnosed With Breast Cancer or Ovarian Cancer, 2012-2019," 2021, published in Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • "Type 2 Diabetes Management, Control and Outcomes During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Older US Veterans: an Observational Study," 2022, published in Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • "Inappropriate Diagnosis of Pneumonia Among Hospitalized Adults," 2024, published in JAMA Internal Medicine
  • "Outcome Measures for Interventions to Reduce Inappropriate Chronic Drugs: A Narrative Review," 2020, published in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Timothy P. Hofer include:

  • Eve A. Kerr
  • Sameer D. Saini
  • Allison W. Kurian
  • Paul Abrahamse
  • Richard Lilford

The scientist has published extensively in several academic venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • JAMA Network Open
  • EFSA Journal
  • Gastroenterology
  • The American Journal of Managed Care

Best Publications

  • Estimating Hospital Deaths Due to Medical Errors: Preventability Is in the Eye of the Reviewer

    Rodney A. Hayward;Timothy P. Hofer

  • The Unreliability of Individual Physician “Report Cards” for Assessing the Costs and Quality of Care of a Chronic Disease

    Timothy P. Hofer;Rodney A. Hayward;Sheldon Greenfield;Edward H. Wagner

  • Socioeconomic disparities in preventive care persist despite universal coverage. Breast and cervical cancer screening in Ontario and the United States.

    Steven J. Katz;Timothy P. Hofer

  • When do patients and their physicians agree on diabetes treatment goals and strategies, and what difference does it make?

    Michele Heisler;Sandeep Vijan;Robert M. Anderson;Peter A. Ubel

  • Cost-utility analysis of screening intervals for diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

    S. Vijan;T. P. Hofer;R. A. Hayward

  • Are physicians aware of which of their patients have indwelling urinary catheters

    Sanjay Saint;Sanjay Saint;Jeff Wiese;John K Amory;John K Amory;Michael L Bernstein

  • Relation between door-to-balloon times and mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention over time: a retrospective study

    Brahmajee K. Nallamothu;Sharon Lise T. Normand;Yongfei Wang;Timothy P. Hofer

  • Estimated Benefits of Glycemic Control in Microvascular Complications in Type 2 Diabetes

    Sandeep Vijan;Timothy P. Hofer;Rodney A. Hayward

  • Who bounces back? Physiologic and other predictors of intensive care unit readmission.

    Andrew L. Rosenberg;Timothy P. Hofer;Rodney A. Hayward;Cathy Strachan

  • Preventing Hospital-Acquired Urinary Tract Infection in the United States: A National Study

    Sanjay Saint;Sanjay Saint;Christine P. Kowalski;Samuel R. Kaufman;Timothy P. Hofer;Timothy P. Hofer

  • Which colon cancer screening test? A comparison of costs, effectiveness, and compliance.

    Sandeep Vijan;Erica W Hwang;Timothy P Hofer;Timothy P Hofer;Rodney A Hayward;Rodney A Hayward

  • Barriers to following dietary recommendations in Type 2 diabetes

    Sandeep Vijan;N. S. Stuart;J. T. Fitzgerald;D. L. Ronis;D. L. Ronis

  • Brief report: the burden of diabetes therapy: implications for the design of effective patient-centered treatment regimens.

    Sandeep Vijan;Rodney A. Hayward;David L. Ronis;Timothy P. Hofer

  • Is acetylcysteine effective in preventing contrast-related nephropathy? A meta-analysis.

    Brahmajee K. Nallamothu;Kaveh G. Shojania;Sanjay Saint;Timothy P. Hofer;Timothy P. Hofer

  • Narrative review: lack of evidence for recommended low- density lipoprotein treatment targets : A solvable problem

    Rodney A. Hayward;Timothy P. Hofer;Sandeep Vijan

  • Accepting critically ill transfer patients: adverse effect on a referral center's outcome and benchmark measures.

    Andrew L. Rosenberg;Timothy P. Hofer;Cathy Strachan;Charles M. Watts

  • Whom should we profile? Examining diabetes care practice variation among primary care providers, provider groups, and health care facilities.

    Sarah L Krein;Timothy P Hofer;Eve A Kerr;Rodney A Hayward

  • Multivariable risk prediction can greatly enhance the statistical power of clinical trial subgroup analysis.

    Rodney A Hayward;Rodney A Hayward;David M Kent;David M Kent;Sandeep Vijan;Sandeep Vijan;Timothy P Hofer;Timothy P Hofer

  • Projections of demand and capacity for colonoscopy related to increasing rates of colorectal cancer screening in the United States.

    S. Vijan;J. Inadomi;J. Inadomi;R. A. Hayward;R. A. Hayward;T. P. Hofer;T. P. Hofer

  • What is an error

    T P Hofer;E A Kerr;R A Hayward

Frequent Co-Authors

Rodney A. Hayward
Rodney A. Hayward University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Steven J. Katz
Steven J. Katz University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Sanjay Saint
Sanjay Saint University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Richard J. Lilford
Richard J. Lilford University of Birmingham
Monica Morrow
Monica Morrow Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Ann S. Hamilton
Ann S. Hamilton University of Southern California
Michele Heisler
Michele Heisler University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Steven M. Asch
Steven M. Asch Stanford University
Reshma Jagsi
Reshma Jagsi University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Allison W. Kurian
Allison W. Kurian Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career related to medicine but want alternative pathways besides traditional MD programs, there are several flexible, in-demand options. For those with a bachelor’s degree in another field, direct entry msn programs for non nurses online can quickly prepare you for advanced nursing roles. These programs offer an accelerated route into nursing and appeal to non-nursing graduates.

If you're looking for options with fewer barriers to entry, direct entry nursing programs can be a great choice, offering practical routes into nursing careers. Additionally, many aspiring healthcare professionals seek nursing school no entrance exam programs to begin their studies without the stress of standardized test requirements.

For those interested in healthcare administration, accredited medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid offer affordable training in a high-demand area, often with the flexibility to study remotely. These pathways make it possible to start a meaningful healthcare career without the long commitment of medical school.

Best Scientists Citing Timothy P. Hofer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles