World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 59 10061 9099 573 513 249 13917
Biology and Biochemistry 61 11278 10391 867 811 236 14470

Alessio Ciulli publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Alessio Ciulli between 2000 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Alessio Ciulli published across 27 years, from 2000 to 2026, averaging 11.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2017. 25 of the 314 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2017. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 30 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 28 publications 2025: 24 publications 2026: 1 publication
2000 2026

314 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Alessio Ciulli: publications per year, 2000 to 2026
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 0
2002 2
2003 1
2004 0
2005 4
2006 2
2007 8
2008 3
2009 12
2010 4
2011 3
2012 20
2013 17
2014 16
2015 10
2016 10
2017 30
2018 25
2019 24
2020 12
2021 23
2022 19
2023 15
2024 28
2025 24
2026 1
Total 314
Download as CSV

Alessio Ciulli publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alessio Ciulli sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 249 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100 249
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Alessio Ciulli D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alessio Ciulli sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930 59
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Alessio Ciulli is affiliated with the University of Dundee in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, contributing extensively to the understanding of molecular mechanisms in these fields.

The scientist has contributed 171 publications in the broad area of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with significant overlap into Medicine through 70 publications. Subfields of their work include molecular biology (169 publications), oncology (47 publications), hematology (17 publications), organic chemistry (5 publications), and computational theory and mathematics (2 publications).

Key topics examined in their research emphasize protein degradation and inhibitors (152 publications), ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (114 publications), and peptidase inhibition and analysis (80 publications). Other topics include multiple myeloma research and treatments (34 publications), histone deacetylase inhibitors research (20 publications), chromatin remodeling and cancer (10 publications), and click chemistry and applications (10 publications).

They have published in a range of scientific journals, with frequent venues including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications
  • RSC Medicinal Chemistry
  • Nature Chemical Biology
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society

Collaborations are a notable part of the scientist's work, with frequent co-authors being:

  • Andrea Testa (18 joint publications)
  • William Farnaby (14 joint publications)
  • Conner Craigon (13 joint publications)
  • Nikolai Makukhin (11 joint publications)
  • Adam G. Bond (11 joint publications)

Representative recent papers illustrate the focal areas of their research:

  • "E3 Ligase Ligands for PROTACs: How They Were Found and How to Discover New Ones" (2020) published in SLAS DISCOVERY
  • "Trivalent PROTACs enhance protein degradation via combined avidity and cooperativity" (2021) published in Nature Chemical Biology
  • "A selective and orally bioavailable VHL-recruiting PROTAC achieves SMARCA2 degradation in vivo" (2022) published in Nature Communications
  • "Discovery of small molecule ligands for the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) E3 ligase and their use as inhibitors and PROTAC degraders" (2022) published in Chemical Society Reviews
  • "Discovery of XL01126: A Potent, Fast, Cooperative, Selective, Orally Bioavailable, and Blood-Brain Barrier Penetrant PROTAC Degrader of Leucine-Rich Repeat Kinase 2" (2022) published in Journal of the American Chemical Society

Best Publications

  • Structural basis of PROTAC cooperative recognition for selective protein degradation.

    Morgan S Gadd;Andrea Testa;Xavier Lucas;Kwok-Ho Chan

  • Selective Small Molecule Induced Degradation of the BET Bromodomain Protein BRD4

    Michael Zengerle;Kwok-Ho Chan;Alessio Ciulli

  • Targeting the von Hippel-Lindau E3 ubiquitin ligase using small molecules to disrupt the VHL/HIF-1α interaction.

    Dennis L. Buckley;Inge Van Molle;Peter C. Gareiss;Hyun Seop Tae

  • BAF complex vulnerabilities in cancer demonstrated via structure-based PROTAC design.

    William Farnaby;Manfred Koegl;Michael J. Roy;Claire Whitworth

  • Structure-Guided Design and Optimization of Small Molecules Targeting the Protein-Protein Interaction between the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) E3 Ubiquitin Ligase and the Hypoxia Inducible Factor (HIF) Alpha Subunit with in Vitro Nanomolar Affinities.

    Carles Galdeano;Morgan Stuart Gadd;Pedro Soares;Salvatore Scaffidi

  • Iterative Design and Optimization of Initially Inactive Proteolysis Targeting Chimeras (PROTACs) Identify VZ185 as a Potent, Fast, and Selective von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) Based Dual Degrader Probe of BRD9 and BRD7

    Vittoria Zoppi;Vittoria Zoppi;Scott J. Hughes;Chiara Maniaci;Andrea Testa

  • SPR-Measured Dissociation Kinetics of PROTAC Ternary Complexes Influence Target Degradation Rate.

    Michael J Roy;Sandra Winkler;Scott J Hughes;Claire Whitworth

  • Small‐Molecule Inhibitors of the Interaction between the E3 Ligase VHL and HIF1α

    Dennis L. Buckley;Jeffrey L. Gustafson;Inge Van Molle;Anke G. Roth

  • Impact of Target Warhead and Linkage Vector on Inducing Protein Degradation: Comparison of Bromodomain and Extra-Terminal (BET) Degraders Derived from Triazolodiazepine (JQ1) and Tetrahydroquinoline (I-BET726) BET Inhibitor Scaffolds

    Kwok Ho Chan;Michael Zengerle;Andrea Testa;Alessio Ciulli

  • A selective and orally bioavailable VHL-recruiting PROTAC achieves SMARCA2 degradation in vivo

    Unknown

  • Homo-PROTACs: bivalent small-molecule dimerizers of the VHL E3 ubiquitin ligase to induce self-degradation

    Chiara Maniaci;Scott J. Hughes;Andrea Testa;Wenzhang Chen

  • Potent and selective chemical probe of hypoxic signalling downstream of HIF-α hydroxylation via VHL inhibition

    Julianty Frost;Carles Galdeano;Carles Galdeano;Pedro Soares;Morgan S. Gadd

  • Targeting Cullin-RING E3 ubiquitin ligases for drug discovery: structure, assembly and small-molecule modulation.

    Emil Bulatov;Alessio Ciulli

  • Discovery of small molecule ligands for the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) E3 ligase and their use as inhibitors and PROTAC degraders

    Unknown

  • Structure-Based Design of a Macrocyclic PROTAC.

    Andrea Testa;Scott J. Hughes;Xavier Lucas;Xavier Lucas;Jane E. Wright

  • Trivalent PROTACs enhance protein degradation via combined avidity and cooperativity.

    Satomi Imaide;Kristin M. Riching;Nikolai Makukhin;Vesna Vetma

  • Molecular recognition of ternary complexes: a new dimension in the structure-guided design of chemical degraders.

    Scott J. Hughes;Alessio Ciulli

  • Dissecting Fragment-Based Lead Discovery at the von Hippel-Lindau Protein:Hypoxia Inducible Factor 1α Protein-Protein Interface

    Inge Van Molle;Andreas Thomann;Dennis L. Buckley;Ernest C. So

  • Discovery of XL01126: A Potent, Fast, Cooperative, Selective, Orally Bioavailable, and Blood–Brain Barrier Penetrant PROTAC Degrader of Leucine-Rich Repeat Kinase 2

    Unknown

  • Probing hot spots at protein-ligand binding sites: a fragment-based approach using biophysical methods.

    Alessio Ciulli;Glyn Williams;Alison G. Smith;Tom L. Blundell

  • Cyclic and Macrocyclic Peptides as Chemical Tools To Recognise Protein Surfaces and Probe Protein-Protein Interactions.

    Teresa A. F. Cardote;Alessio Ciulli

  • Group-Based Optimization of Potent and Cell-Active Inhibitors of the von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) E3 Ubiquitin Ligase: Structure–Activity Relationships Leading to the Chemical Probe (2S,4R)-1-((S)-2-(1-Cyanocyclopropanecarboxamido)-3,3-dimethylbutanoyl)-4-hydroxy-N-(4-(4-methylthiazol-5-yl)benzyl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxamide (VH298)

    Pedro Soares;Morgan S. Gadd;Julianty Frost;Carles Galdeano

  • Bromodomain-peptide displacement assays for interactome mapping and inhibitor discovery

    Martin Philpott;Jing Yang;Tony Tumber;Oleg Fedorov

Frequent Co-Authors

Chris Abell
Chris Abell University of Cambridge
Tom L. Blundell
Tom L. Blundell University of Cambridge
Craig M. Crews
Craig M. Crews Yale University
Sonia Rocha
Sonia Rocha University of Liverpool
Panagis Filippakopoulos
Panagis Filippakopoulos Structural Genomics Consortium
Oleg Fedorov
Oleg Fedorov University of Oxford
Stefan Knapp
Stefan Knapp Goethe University Frankfurt
Alison G. Smith
Alison G. Smith University of Cambridge
Dario R. Alessi
Dario R. Alessi University of Dundee
Francesco Bertoni
Francesco Bertoni Institute of Oncology Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Chemistry, exploring related fields such as forensic science and criminal justice can open doors to diverse career options. Many universities now offer affordable and flexible programs, including an online forensic science degree that combines chemical principles with investigative techniques.

Advanced studies are also available, such as an online forensic psychology masters, which bridges psychology and law enforcement, complementing the scientific background gained in chemistry.

Graduates can pursue various forensic careers, ranging from laboratory analysis to crime scene investigation. These roles often require strong analytical skills and a solid foundation in scientific methods.

When considering these educational paths, it's important to understand tuition costs and other financial commitments. Resources outlining how much a criminal justice degree costs can help prospective students make informed decisions about their investment in education.

Best Scientists Citing Alessio Ciulli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles