World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
99
Citations
38926
World Ranking
8551
National Ranking
4402

Rodney A. Hayward publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rodney A. Hayward sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 337 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Rodney A. Hayward D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rodney A. Hayward sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 99 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rodney A. Hayward is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of medicine, with significant focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, epidemiology, psychiatry and mental health, public health, environmental and occupational health, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics including blood pressure and hypertension studies, acute ischemic stroke management, dementia and cognitive impairment research, cerebrovascular and carotid artery diseases, stroke rehabilitation and recovery, health systems, economic evaluations, quality of life, and advanced causal inference techniques.

Hayward has published multiple papers in several notable scientific journals. Recent publications include:

  • Development of the Instrument to assess the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses (ICEMAN) in randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses, 2020, Canadian Medical Association Journal
  • Sex Differences in Cognitive Decline Among US Adults, 2021, JAMA Network Open
  • Association Between Blood Pressure and Later-Life Cognition Among Black and White Individuals, 2020, JAMA Neurology
  • Dealing with the Lack of Time for Detailed Shared Decision-making in Primary Care: Everyday Shared Decision-making, 2020, Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • Associations Between Vascular Risk Factor Levels and Cognitive Decline Among Stroke Survivors, 2023, JAMA Network Open

The scientist frequently collaborates with peers including Jeremy B. Sussman, Deborah A. Levine, Rebecca F. Gottesman, Rachael T. Whitney, and Alden L. Gross. These co-authors have contributed to multiple studies alongside Hayward.

Hayward's research has been published repeatedly in venues such as Stroke, JAMA Network Open, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, and Medical Care. The prolific presence in these journals highlights their ongoing engagement in cardiovascular and neurological fields.

Best Publications

  • Glucose Control and Vascular Complications in Veterans with Type 2 Diabetes

    William Duckworth;Carlos Abraira;Thomas Moritz;Domenic Reda

  • Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire.

    Kevin C. Chung;Matthew S. Pillsbury;Madonna R. Walters;Rodney A. Hayward

  • The relative importance of physician communication, participatory decision making, and patient understanding in diabetes self-management.

    Michele Heisler;Michele Heisler;Reynard R. Bouknight;Rodney A. Hayward;Dylan M. Smith

  • A randomized trial of rectal indomethacin to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis

    B. Joseph Elmunzer;James M. Scheiman;Glen A. Lehman;Amitabh Chak

  • Estimating Hospital Deaths Due to Medical Errors: Preventability Is in the Eye of the Reviewer

    Rodney A. Hayward;Timothy P. Hofer

  • Follow-up of Glycemic Control and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes

    Rodney A. Hayward;Peter D. Reaven;Wyndy L. Wiitala;Gideon D. Bahn

  • The Unreliability of Individual Physician “Report Cards” for Assessing the Costs and Quality of Care of a Chronic Disease

    Timothy P. Hofer;Rodney A. Hayward;Sheldon Greenfield;Edward H. Wagner

  • Comparison of Quality of Care for Patients in the Veterans Health Administration and Patients in a National Sample

    Steven M. Asch;Elizabeth A. McGlynn;Mary M. Hogan;Rodney A. Hayward

  • Adherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial of Competing Strategies

    John M. Inadomi;Sandeep Vijan;Nancy K. Janz;Angela Fagerlin

  • Limitations of applying summary results of clinical trials to individual patients: the need for risk stratification.

    David M. Kent;Rodney A. Hayward

  • Assessing and reporting heterogeneity in treatment effects in clinical trials: a proposal

    David M Kent;Peter M Rothwell;John P A Ioannidis;John P A Ioannidis;Doug G Altman

  • Effects of intensive glucose control on microvascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised controlled trials.

    Sophia Zoungas;Sophia Zoungas;Hisatomi Arima;Hisatomi Arima;Hertzel C Gerstein;Rury R Holman

  • Development of the Instrument to assess the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses (ICEMAN) in randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses.

    Stefan Schandelmaier;Stefan Schandelmaier;Matthias Briel;Matthias Briel;Ravi Varadhan;Christopher H. Schmid

  • Examining the evidence: a systematic review of the inclusion and analysis of older adults in randomized controlled trials.

    Donna M. Zulman;Donna M. Zulman;Donna M. Zulman;Jeremy B. Sussman;Jeremy B. Sussman;Jeremy B. Sussman;Xisui Chen;Christine T. Cigolle

  • Who Gets Screened for Cervical and Breast Cancer? Results from a New National Survey

    Rodney A. Hayward;Martin F. Shapiro;Howard E. Freeman;Christopher R. Corey

  • Duration of resuscitation efforts and survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational study

    Zachary D Goldberger;Paul S Chan;Robert A Berg;Steven L Kronick

  • Cost-utility analysis of screening intervals for diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

    S. Vijan;T. P. Hofer;R. A. Hayward

  • Treatment of Hypertension in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Blood Pressure Goals, Choice of Agents, and Setting Priorities in Diabetes Care

    Sandeep Vijan;Rodney A. Hayward

  • The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ): assessment of responsiveness to clinical change.

    Kevin C. Chung;Jennifer B. Hamill;Madonna R. Walters;Rodney A. Hayward

  • Beyond the Randomized Clinical Trial The Role of Effectiveness Studies in Evaluating Cardiovascular Therapies

    Brahmajee K. Nallamothu;Rodney A. Hayward;Eric R. Bates

Frequent Co-Authors

Timothy P. Hofer
Timothy P. Hofer University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Michele Heisler
Michele Heisler University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Brahmajee K. Nallamothu
Brahmajee K. Nallamothu University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Martin F. Shapiro
Martin F. Shapiro Cornell University
Steven M. Asch
Steven M. Asch Stanford University
Sanjay Basu
Sanjay Basu Stanford University
Kenneth M. Langa
Kenneth M. Langa University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Kevin C. Chung
Kevin C. Chung University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Deborah Levine
Deborah Levine University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Angela Fagerlin
Angela Fagerlin University of Utah

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine or nursing in the USA opens up several flexible online education options. For individuals seeking advanced research or academic roles, many phd nursing programs online offer affordability and convenience for working professionals. These programs prepare nurses for leadership positions and specialized fields.

If you’re a registered nurse aiming to advance your qualifications, finding what is the cheapest rn to bsn program online can make further education more accessible and cost-effective. Earning a BSN can open doors to a wider range of nursing roles and increase job security.

Non-nursing graduates can consider career changes with programs such as non nursing bachelor's to msn online, which allow you to quickly earn a Master of Science in Nursing. These direct-entry programs are designed for students from different academic backgrounds wanting to enter the nursing field.

Choosing the right educational pathway is crucial. Many prospective students look for whats the easiest nursing program to get into? to maximize their chances of acceptance and success. With many flexible options, online degrees support a variety of career goals in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Rodney A. Hayward

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles