World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
33
Citations
5421
World Ranking
12569
National Ranking
5095

Erich M. Nahum publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erich M. Nahum sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 112 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Erich M. Nahum D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erich M. Nahum sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - ACM Distinguished Member

Overview

Erich M. Nahum is affiliated with IBM in the United States and has a research focus primarily in computer science, with a specialization in artificial intelligence. Their work extensively covers advanced graph neural networks and topic modeling.

Their recent publication includes the paper titled NorBERT: NetwOrk Representations through BERT for Network Analysis and Management, published in 2022 in arXiv (Cornell University).

Erich M. Nahum has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, notably:

  • Franck Le
  • Davis Wertheimer
  • Seraphin Calo

The primary venue for their research publications is arXiv (Cornell University), where they have contributed at least one paper.

Their academic contributions fall within the following fields of study:

  • Computer Science
  • Artificial Intelligence

Erich's main topics of work include:

  • Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Topic Modeling

Among formal recognitions, Erich M. Nahum was named an ACM Distinguished Member in 2012.

Best Publications

  • Locality-aware request distribution in cluster-based network servers

    Vivek S. Pai;Mohit Aron;Gaurov Banga;Michael Svendsen

  • A measurement-based study of MultiPath TCP performance over wireless networks

    Yung-Chih Chen;Yeon-sup Lim;Richard J. Gibbens;Erich M. Nahum

  • A method for transparent admission control and request scheduling in e-commerce web sites

    Sameh Elnikety;Erich Nahum;John Tracey;Willy Zwaenepoel

  • Yaksha: a self-tuning controller for managing the performance of 3-tiered Web sites

    A. Kamra;V. Misra;E.M. Nahum

  • ECF: An MPTCP Path Scheduler to Manage Heterogeneous Paths

    Yeon-sup Lim;Erich M. Nahum;Don Towsley;Richard J. Gibbens

  • Overload protection for SIP servers

    Arup Acharya;Erich M. Nahum;John Michael Tracey;Xiping Wang

  • Performance issues in WWW servers

    Erich Nahum;Tsipora Barzilai;Dilip D. Kandlur

  • A study of Internet instant messaging and chat protocols

    R.B. Jennings;E.M. Nahum;D.P. Olshefski;D. Saha

  • How to Determine a Good Multi-Programming Level for External Scheduling

    B. Schroeder;M. Harchol-Balter;A. Iyengar;E. Nahum

  • The effects of wide-area conditions on WWW server performance

    Erich M. Nahum;Marcel-Catalin Rosu;Srinivasan Seshan;Jussara Almeida

  • Performance issues in parallelized network protocols

    Erich M. Nahum;David J. Yates;James F. Kurose;Don Towsley

  • State recovery and failover of intelligent network adapters

    Douglas Morgan Freimuth;Ronald Mraz;Erich Nahum;Prashant Pradhan

  • Evaluating SIP server performance

    Erich M. Nahum;John Tracey;Charles P. Wright

  • Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Server Overload Control: Design and Evaluation

    Charles Shen;Henning Schulzrinne;Erich Nahum

  • Cryptographic strength of ssl/tls servers: current and recent practices

    Homin K. Lee;Tal Malkin;Erich Nahum

  • Cross-layer path management in multi-path transport protocol for mobile devices

    Yeon-sup Lim;Yung-Chih Chen;Erich M. Nahum;Don Towsley

  • Achieving Class-Based QoS for Transactional Workloads

    B. Schroeder;M. Harchol-Balter;A. Iyengar;E. Nahum

  • Apparatus and method for supporting connection establishment in an offload of network protocol processing

    Douglas M. New York Freimuth;Elbert C. Elmhurst Hu;Ronald South Salem Mraz;Erich M. Nahum

  • How green is multipath TCP for mobile devices

    Yeon-sup Lim;Yung-Chih Chen;Erich M. Nahum;Don Towsley

  • Enabling Content-Based Load Distribution for Scalable Services

    Guerney Hunt;Erich Nahum

Frequent Co-Authors

Douglas M. Freimuth
Douglas M. Freimuth IBM (United States)
Sambit Sahu
Sambit Sahu IBM (United States)
Don Towsley
Don Towsley University of Massachusetts Amherst
Anees Shaikh
Anees Shaikh Google (United States)
Asser N. Tantawi
Asser N. Tantawi IBM (United States)
Jim Kurose
Jim Kurose University of Massachusetts Amherst
Henning Schulzrinne
Henning Schulzrinne Columbia University
Renu Tewari
Renu Tewari LinkedIn
Dakshi Agrawal
Dakshi Agrawal IBM (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring further study options and career pathways is essential for anyone pursuing Computer Science in the USA. Many students are interested in flexible and cost-effective choices to enhance their qualifications. For those looking to boost their business acumen, cheapest mba online programs can provide a valuable edge in tech-driven business roles without a hefty price tag.

If time is a concern, consider some of the best one year masters programs available online, offering advanced credentials in a fast-tracked format. Similarly, certain fields offer quick degrees that pay well, allowing you to enter high-demand tech jobs sooner, often with strong salary prospects.

For those fascinated by cutting-edge technology, exploring the best online masters in artificial intelligence can open doors to specialized AI careers. With so many flexible online pathways, advancing your career in Computer Science has never been more accessible or affordable.

Best Scientists Citing Erich M. Nahum

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles