World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
77
Citations
21608
World Ranking
18430
National Ranking
1670

Edwin R. Chilvers publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin R. Chilvers sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 337 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Edwin R. Chilvers D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin R. Chilvers sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom

Best Publications

  • Neutrophil kinetics in health and disease

    Charlotte Summers;Sara M. Rankin;Alison M. Condliffe;Nanak Singh

  • Extracellular matrix proteins protect small cell lung cancer cells against apoptosis: A mechanism for small cell lung cancer growth and drug resistance in vivo

    Tariq Sethi;Robert C. Rintoul;Sarah M. Moore;Alison C. MacKinnon

  • Hypoxia-induced neutrophil survival is mediated by HIF-1α–dependent NF-κB activity

    Sarah R. Walmsley;Cristin G. Print;Neda Farahi;Carole Peyssonnaux

  • Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase δ Gene Mutation Predisposes to Respiratory Infection and Airway Damage

    Ivan Angulo;Oscar Vadas;Fabien Garçon;Edward Banham-Hall

  • Neutrophil Priming: Pathophysiological Consequences and Underlying Mechanisms

    A. M. Condliffe;E. Kitchen;E. R. Chilvers

  • NF-κB Activation Is a Critical Regulator of Human Granulocyte Apoptosis in Vitro

    Carol Ward;Edwin R. Chilvers;Mark F. Lawson;James G. Pryde

  • Regulation of Neutrophil Apoptosis by Tumor Necrosis Factor-α: Requirement for TNFR55 and TNFR75 for Induction of Apoptosis In Vitro

    Joanna Murray;Joanna Murray;Joanna Murray;Jeffrey A.J. Barbara;Jeffrey A.J. Barbara;Jeffrey A.J. Barbara;Sarah A. Dunkley;Sarah A. Dunkley;Sarah A. Dunkley;Angel F. Lopez;Angel F. Lopez;Angel F. Lopez

  • The Neutrophil Life Cycle

    Andrés Hidalgo;Andrés Hidalgo;Edwin R. Chilvers;Charlotte Summers;Leo Koenderman

  • Sequential activation of class IB and class IA PI3K is important for the primed respiratory burst of human but not murine neutrophils

    Alison M. Condliffe;Keith Davidson;Karen E. Anderson;Chris D. Ellson

  • Efficacy and tolerability of anti-immunoglobulin E therapy with omalizumab in patients with poorly controlled (moderate-to-severe) allergic asthma

    Jonathan Geoffrey Ayres;B. Higgins;E. R. Chilvers;G. Ayre

  • Copy number of FCGR3B, which is associated with systemic lupus erythematosus, correlates with protein expression and immune complex uptake

    Lisa C. Willcocks;Paul A. Lyons;Menna R. Clatworthy;James I. Robinson

  • Hypoxia prolongs neutrophil survival in vitro

    Sharon Hannah;Kathryn Mecklenburgh;Irfan Rahman;Geoffrey J. Bellingan

  • Advances in Neutrophil Biology: Clinical Implications

    Andrew S. Cowburn;Alison M. Condliffe;Neda Farahi;Charlotte Summers

  • Acceleration of human neutrophil apoptosis by TRAIL.

    Stephen A. Renshaw;Jasvir S. Parmar;Vanessa Singleton;Sarah J. Rowe

  • Prolyl hydroxylase 3 (PHD3) is essential for hypoxic regulation of neutrophilic inflammation in humans and mice

    Sarah R. Walmsley;Edwin R. Chilvers;Alfred A. Thompson;Kathryn Vaughan

  • Pharmacological manipulation of granulocyte apoptosis: potential therapeutic targets

    Carol Ward;Ian Dransfield;Edwin R Chilvers;Chris Haslett

  • The Presence of a Constitutively Active Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase in Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells Mediates Anchorage-independent Proliferation via a Protein Kinase B and p70s6k-dependent Pathway

    Sarah M. Moore;Robert C. Rintoul;Trevor R. Walker;Edwin R. Chilvers

  • Polymers of alpha(1)-antitrypsin are chemotactic for human neutrophils: a new paradigm for the pathogenesis of emphysema.

    Jasvir S. Parmar;Ravi Mahadeva;Benjamin J. Reed;Neda Farahi

  • Treating idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with the addition of co-trimoxazole: a randomised controlled trial

    Ludmila Shulgina;Anthony P Cahn;Edwin R Chilvers;Helen Parfrey

  • Regulation of Neutrophil Apoptosis by Tumor Necrosis Factor-a: Requirement for TNFR55 and TNFR75 for Induction of Apoptosis In Vitro

    Joanna Murray;Sarah A. Dunkley;Angel F. Lopez;Xaveer Van Ostade

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher Haslett
Christopher Haslett University of Edinburgh
Moira K. B. Whyte
Moira K. B. Whyte University of Edinburgh
Randall S. Johnson
Randall S. Johnson University of Cambridge
Adriano G. Rossi
Adriano G. Rossi University of Edinburgh
Nicholas W. Morrell
Nicholas W. Morrell University of Cambridge
Stefan R. Nahorski
Stefan R. Nahorski University of Leicester
David H. Dockrell
David H. Dockrell University of Edinburgh
Ian Dransfield
Ian Dransfield University of Edinburgh
Len R. Stephens
Len R. Stephens Babraham Institute
R. A. John Challiss
R. A. John Challiss University of Leicester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a medical career in the USA goes beyond traditional on-campus programs. Today, a wide range of related online degrees in healthcare are available, offering flexibility for students working or managing other responsibilities. These programs can jumpstart your healthcare journey or help you advance further without relocating.

Becoming a nurse practitioner is a popular choice, and you can find some of the most affordable online nurse practitioner programs to earn this specialized credential. If you’re just beginning, nursing school online options let you complete core requirements from home.

For those pursuing advanced practice or research, enrolling in one of the cheapest dnp programs can open up leadership opportunities in healthcare. Already a registered nurse? Accelerate your professional growth by choosing the cheapest rn to bsn program that meets your needs.

These pathways empower you to build a solid foundation and continue growing in America’s evolving healthcare sector—all while studying online and making smart financial choices.

Best Scientists Citing Edwin R. Chilvers

Trending Scientists