World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michal Lavidor

Michal Lavidor

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
6688
World Ranking
7928
National Ranking
78

Neuroscience

D-Index
42
Citations
7032
World Ranking
7651
National Ranking
56

Michal Lavidor publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michal Lavidor sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 135 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Michal Lavidor D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michal Lavidor sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michal Lavidor is affiliated with Bar-Ilan University in Israel. Their research focuses primarily on psychology, neuroscience, and medicine, with a notable emphasis on cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, psychiatry and mental health, neurology, and social psychology.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics related to transcranial magnetic stimulation studies, neural and behavioral psychology studies, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, action observation and synchronization, pain management and treatment, schizophrenia research and treatment, and cognitive abilities and testing.

Among recent publications are:

  • Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement (2022) in Clinical Neurophysiology Practice
  • Interpersonal autonomic nervous system synchrony and its association to relationship and performance - a systematic review and meta-analysis (2021) in Physiology & Behavior
  • Digitalized transcranial electrical stimulation: A consensus statement (2022) in Clinical Neurophysiology
  • The interactive effect of empathy and motor cortex stimulation on hand gesture comprehension (2020) in Neuropsychologia
  • Rivalry and performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2022) in Organizational Psychology Review

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Andrea Antal
  • Agnes Flöel
  • Ilanit Gordon
  • Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon
  • Shachar Ben Izhak

Publication venues where Michal Lavidor has appeared repeatedly include:

  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Neuropsychologia
  • Clinical Psychology Review
  • Symmetry
  • Development and Psychopathology

Best Publications

  • tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review

    Liron Jacobson;Meni Koslowsky;Michal Lavidor;Michal Lavidor

  • Modulating behavioral inhibition by tDCS combined with cognitive training.

    Thomas Ditye;Liron Jacobson;Vincent Walsh;Michal Lavidor;Michal Lavidor

  • Activation of inhibition: Diminishing impulsive behavior by direct current stimulation over the inferior frontal gyrus

    Liron Jacobson;Daniel C. Javitt;Michal Lavidor

  • Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement

    Unknown

  • Mechanisms of magnetic stimulation of central nervous system neurons.

    Tamar Pashut;Shuki Wolfus;Alex Friedman;Michal Lavidor

  • Enhancing cognitive control components of insight problems solving by anodal tDCS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

    Nili Metuki;Tal Sela;Michal Lavidor;Michal Lavidor

  • Empathic accuracy and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analytic review

    Haran Sened;Michal Lavidor;Gal Lazarus;Eran Bar-Kalifa

  • Semantically convergent and semantically divergent priming in the cerebral hemispheres: lexical decision and semantic judgment

    Miriam Faust;Michal Lavidor

  • Increasing propensity to mind-wander with transcranial direct current stimulation.

    Vadim Axelrod;Geraint Rees;Michal Lavidor;Moshe Bar

  • Transcranial alternating current stimulation increases risk-taking behavior in the balloon analog risk task.

    Tal Sela;Adi Kilim;Michal Lavidor;Michal Lavidor

  • The role of the right cerebral hemisphere in processing novel metaphoric expressions: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study

    Gorana Pobric;Nira Mashal;Miriam Faust;Michal Lavidor

  • The nature of foveal representation

    Michal Lavidor;Vincent Walsh

  • How sleep is related to fatigue.

    Michal Lavidor;Aron Weller;Harvey Babkoff

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates decision making in a probabilistic guessing task.

    David Hecht;Vincent Walsh;Michal Lavidor

  • Modulating oscillatory brain activity correlates of behavioral inhibition using transcranial direct current stimulation

    Liron Jacobson;Adi Ezra;Uri Berger;Michal Lavidor;Michal Lavidor

  • Reducing aggression with martial arts: A meta-analysis of child and youth studies

    Anna Harwood;Michal Lavidor;Yuri Rassovsky;Yuri Rassovsky

  • When less is more: Evidence for a facilitative cathodal tdcs effect in attentional abilities

    Michal Weiss;Michal Lavidor

  • Cerebral lateralization of frontal lobe language processes and lateralization of the posterior visual word processing system

    Qing Cai;Michal Lavidor;Marc Brysbaert;Yves Paulignan

  • Prefrontal oscillatory stimulation modulates access to cognitive control references in retrospective metacognitive commentary.

    Oded Meiron;Michal Lavidor

  • Word length and orthographic neighborhood size effects in the left and right cerebral hemispheres.

    Michal Lavidor;Andrew W. Ellis

  • Lexical ambiguity resolution in Wernicke's area and its right homologue.

    Yuval Harpaz;Yechiel Levkovitz;Michal Lavidor;Michal Lavidor

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew W. Ellis
Andrew W. Ellis University of York
Vincent Walsh
Vincent Walsh University College London
Daniel C. Javitt
Daniel C. Javitt Columbia University
Richard Shillcock
Richard Shillcock University of Edinburgh
Miriam Faust
Miriam Faust Bar-Ilan University
Izhar Bar-Gad
Izhar Bar-Gad Bar-Ilan University
Agnes Flöel
Agnes Flöel Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Aron Weller
Aron Weller Bar-Ilan University
Stefan R. Schweinberger
Stefan R. Schweinberger Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Alan Apter
Alan Apter Reichman University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in neuroscience, it’s important to explore your academic and career options. Many students now prefer accelerated programs online, which let you earn your bachelor’s degree more quickly. These flexible formats are ideal for motivated learners or those balancing work and studies.

Not sure which degree to pursue? Researching what bachelors degree should i get can help you align your interests with higher-earning fields. Neuroscience is a fascinating discipline with connections to health, technology, and psychology, and it’s also considered among interesting majors that pay well.

Affordability is another key factor. Choosing an online college that accepts fafsa ensures access to federal financial aid, making your education more accessible. Exploring these online pathways and financial options will help set you up for a rewarding career in neuroscience or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Michal Lavidor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles