World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
74
Citations
18688
World Ranking
2123
National Ranking
1011

Michael T. Shipley publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael T. Shipley sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 160 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Michael T. Shipley D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael T. Shipley sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Michael T. Shipley is affiliated with the University of Maryland, Baltimore in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within neuroscience, including specialized subfields and diverse topics that intersect behavioral, sensory, and medical studies.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Neuroscience

Within this broad domain, their research further breaks down into subfields such as:

  • Social Psychology
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
  • Immunology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems

Key topics addressed in their work encompass:

  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Diverse Music Education Insights

Recent scholarly contributions include the following published papers:

  • "Short-term plasticity in glomerular inhibitory circuits shapes olfactory bulb output," 2020, Journal of Neurophysiology
  • "National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant awards: does past performance predict future success?," 2020, Palgrave Communications
  • "Music Performance Anxiety in Musical Theater Performers: A Pilot Study," 2022, Journal of Dance Medicine & Science
  • "The inflammatory response to birth requires MyD88 and is driven by both mother and offspring," 2023, Brain Behavior and Immunity
  • "Jean Ross Colston," 2021, BMJ

Frequent collaborators in Michael T. Shipley's research endeavors include:

  • Adam C. Puché
  • Fu-Wen Zhou
  • Zuoyi Shao
  • Joni M. Prasad
  • Terry B. Rogers

Predominant venues for publishing their work reflect the interdisciplinary nature of their research:

  • Journal of Neurophysiology
  • Palgrave Communications
  • Journal of Dance Medicine & Science
  • Brain Behavior and Immunity
  • BMJ

Michael T. Shipley received recognition as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2019.

Best Publications

  • Columnar organization in the midbrain periaqueductal gray: modules for emotional expression?

    Richard Bandler;Michael T. Shipley

  • Functional organization of olfactory system.

    Michael T. Shipley;Matthew Ennis

  • Connections between the central nucleus of the amygdala and the midbrain periaqueductal gray: Topography and reciprocity

    Tilat A. Rizvi;Matthew Ennis;Michael M. Behbehani;Michael T. Shipley

  • Ultrasensitive pheromone detection by mammalian vomeronasal neurons.

    Trese Leinders-Zufall;Andrew P. Lane;Adam C. Puche;Weidong Ma

  • Afferent regulation of locus coeruleus neurons: anatomy, physiology and pharmacology

    G. Aston-Jones;M. T. Shipley;G. Chouvet;M. Ennis

  • Centre-surround inhibition among olfactory bulb glomeruli

    J. L. Aungst;P. M. Heyward;P. M. Heyward;A. C. Puche;S. V. Karnup

  • Coding and synaptic processing of sensory information in the glomerular layer of the olfactory bulb.

    Matt Wachowiak;Michael T. Shipley

  • Quantitative analysis of neuronal diversity in the mouse olfactory bulb

    S. Parrish-Aungst;M.T. Shipley;F. Erdelyi;G. Szabo

  • the connections of the mouse olfactory bulb: A study using orthograde and retrograde transport of wheat germ agglutinin conjugated to horseradish peroxidase

    Unknown

  • Role of the locus coeruleus in emotional activation.

    Gary Aston-Jones;Janusz Rajkowski;Piotr Kubiak;Rita J. Valentino

  • External Tufted Cells: A Major Excitatory Element That Coordinates Glomerular Activity

    Abdallah Hayar;Sergei Karnup;Matthew Ennis;Michael T. Shipley

  • Surprisingly rich projection from locus coeruleus to the olfactory bulb in the rat

    Unknown

  • Chemoanatomical organization of the noradrenergic input from locus coeruleus to the olfactory bulb of the adult rat.

    John H. McLean;Michael T. Shipley;William T. Nickell;Gary Aston-Jones

  • Olfactory bulb glomeruli: external tufted cells intrinsically burst at theta frequency and are entrained by patterned olfactory input.

    Abdallah Hayar;Sergei Karnup;Michael T. Shipley;Matthew Ennis

  • Dopamine D2 receptor-mediated presynaptic inhibition of olfactory nerve terminals.

    Matthew Ennis;Fu-Ming Zhou;Kelly J. Ciombor;Vassiliki Aroniadou-Anderjaska

  • Evidence that pioneer olfactory axons regulate telencephalon cell cycle kinetics to induce the formation of the olfactory bulb

    Qizhi Gong;Michael T Shipley

  • Molecular identity of periglomerular and short axon cells

    Emi Kiyokage;Yu Zhen Pan;Zuoyi Shao;Kazuto Kobayashi

  • Tonic and Synaptically Evoked Presynaptic Inhibition of Sensory Input to the Rat Olfactory Bulb Via GABABHeteroreceptors

    Vassiliki Aroniadou-Anderjaska;Fu-Ming Zhou;Catherine A. Priest;Matthew Ennis

  • Transport of molecules from nose to brain: Transneuronal anterograde and retrograde labeling in the rat olfactory system by wheat germ agglutinin-horseradish peroxidase applied to the nasal epithelium

    Unknown

  • Subregions of the periaqueductal gray topographically innervate the rostral ventral medulla in the rat.

    Elisabeth J. van Bockstaele;Elisabeth J. van Bockstaele;Gary Aston-Jones;Vincent A. Pieribone;Matthew Ennis

  • Long-Lasting Depolarizations in Mitral Cells of the Rat Olfactory Bulb

    Greg C. Carlson;Michael T. Shipley;Asaf Keller

  • Activation of Locus Coeruleus Enhances the Responses of Olfactory Bulb Mitral Cells to Weak Olfactory Nerve Input

    Maorong Jiang;Edwin R. Griff;Matthew Ennis;Lee A. Zimmer

  • Olfactory nerve stimulation activates rat mitral cells via NMDA and non-NMDA receptors in vitro.

    Matthew Ennis;Lee A. Zimmer;Michael T. Shipley

Frequent Co-Authors

Adam C. Puche
Adam C. Puche University of Maryland, Baltimore
Matt Wachowiak
Matt Wachowiak University of Utah
Vassiliki Aroniadou-Anderjaska
Vassiliki Aroniadou-Anderjaska Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Gary Aston-Jones
Gary Aston-Jones Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Anne Z. Murphy
Anne Z. Murphy Georgia State University
Michael M. Behbehani
Michael M. Behbehani University of Cincinnati Medical Center
Frank L. Margolis
Frank L. Margolis University of Maryland, Baltimore
Lique M. Coolen
Lique M. Coolen Kent State University
Jan G. Veening
Jan G. Veening Radboud University
Paul R. Sanberg
Paul R. Sanberg University of South Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Michael T. Shipley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles