World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
65
Citations
16130
World Ranking
3105
National Ranking
83

Richard Bandler publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Bandler sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 128 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Richard Bandler D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Bandler sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard Bandler is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia. Their academic profile currently does not list recent papers, co-authors, or specific publication venues, which limits detailed insight into their research output and collaborative network.

There is no documented information about the specific fields or subfields of study that Richard Bandler specializes in, nor are there records of particular topics covered in their academic work. This absence of data means that the areas of focus in their research remain undefined based on the available source.

Similarly, there are no recorded publications of books under Richard Bandler's name, and no details regarding publishers or the number of book publications. Without these records, it is not possible to describe the nature or scope of any longer-form contributions to academic literature.

The profile also does not indicate any awards received by Richard Bandler, reflecting a lack of public recognition or documentation of honors in the academic or professional sphere.

Richard Bandler is currently active, with no indication of being deceased.

Best Publications

  • Columnar organization in the midbrain periaqueductal gray: modules for emotional expression?

    Richard Bandler;Michael T. Shipley

  • Central circuits mediating patterned autonomic activity during active vs. passive emotional coping.

    Richard Bandler;Kevin A Keay;Kevin A Keay;Nicole Floyd;Joseph Price

  • Prefrontal cortical projections to longitudinal columns in the midbrain periaqueductal gray in macaque monkeys.

    X. An;R. Bandler;D. Öngür;J.L. Price

  • Parallel circuits mediating distinct emotional coping reactions to different types of stress

    Kevin A. Keay;Richard Bandler;Richard Bandler

  • The emotional motor system.

    Gert Holstege;Richard Bandler;Clifford B. Saper

  • A method for evoking physiological responses by stimulation of cell bodies, but not axons of passage, within localized regions of the central nervous system

    A.K. Goodchild;R.A.L. Dampney;R. Bandler

  • Integrated defence reaction elicited by excitatory amino acid microinjection in the midbrain periaqueductal grey region of the unrestrained cat

    Richard Bandler;Pascal Carrive

  • Orbitomedial prefrontal cortical projections to distinct longitudinal columns of the periaqueductal gray in the rat.

    Nicole S. Floyd;Joseph L. Price;Amon T. Ferry;Kevin A. Keay;Kevin A. Keay

  • Chapter 13 Integration of somatic and autonomic reactions within the midbrain periaqueductal grey: Viscerotopic, somatotopic and functional organization

    Richard Bandler;Pascal Carrive;Shi Ping Zhang

  • Columnar organization in the midbrain periaqueductal gray and the integration of emotional expression.

    Richard Bandler;Kevin A. Keay

  • Expression of c-Fos-like immunoreactivity in the caudal medulla and upper cervical spinal cord following stimulation of the superior sagittal sinus in the cat.

    Holger Kaube;Kevin A. Keay;Karen L. Hoskin;Richard Bandler

  • The Midbrain Periaqueductal Gray Matter

    Antoine Depaulis;Richard Bandler

  • Midbrain Periaqueductal Gray Control of Defensive Behavior in the Cat and the Rat

    Richard Bandler;Antoine Depaulis

  • Viscerotopic organization of neurons subserving hypotensive reactions within the midbrain periaqueductal grey: a correlative functional and anatomical study.

    Pascal Carrive;Richard Bandler

  • Longitudinal neuronal organization of defensive reactions in the midbrain periaqueductal gray region of the rat.

    Antoine Depaulis;Kevin A. Keay;Richard Bandler

  • Orbitomedial prefrontal cortical projections to hypothalamus in the rat

    Nicole S. Floyd;Joseph L. Price;Amon T. Ferry;Kevin A. Keay;Kevin A. Keay

  • The Midbrain periaqueductal gray matter : functional, anatomical, and neurochemical organization

    Antoine Depaulis;Richard Bandler

  • Brain stem integration of vocalization: role of the midbrain periaqueductal gray.

    Shi Ping Zhang;P. J. Davis;R. Bandler;P. Carrive

  • Deep and superficial noxious stimulation increases Fos-like immunoreactivity in different regions of the midbrain periaqueductal grey of the rat

    Kevin A. Keay;Richard Bandler

  • Induction of ‘page’ following microinjections of glutamate into midbrain but not hypothalamus of cats

    Richard Bandler

Frequent Co-Authors

Kevin A. Keay
Kevin A. Keay University of Sydney
Pascal Carrive
Pascal Carrive University of New South Wales
Luke A. Henderson
Luke A. Henderson University of Sydney
Antoine Depaulis
Antoine Depaulis Grenoble Alpes University
Joseph L. Price
Joseph L. Price Washington University in St. Louis
Ronald M. Harper
Ronald M. Harper University of California, Los Angeles
Jeffry R. Alger
Jeffry R. Alger University of California, Los Angeles
Jerome Engel
Jerome Engel University of California, Los Angeles
R.A.L. Dampney
R.A.L. Dampney University of Sydney
Holger Kaube
Holger Kaube University of Freiburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Richard Bandler

Recently Published Articles