World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Alexander Tarakhovsky

Alexander Tarakhovsky

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
66
Citations
23998
World Ranking
8470
National Ranking
3809

Alexander Tarakhovsky publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander Tarakhovsky sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 119 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Alexander Tarakhovsky D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander Tarakhovsky sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alexander Tarakhovsky is affiliated with Rockefeller University in the United States and focuses their research primarily within the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Their work spans several subfields including Molecular Biology, Immunology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Oncology, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The scientist's research topics cover a variety of areas with a strong emphasis on interferon and immune responses, genomics and chromatin dynamics, epigenetics and DNA methylation, RNA research and splicing, polyomavirus and related diseases, as well as aspects of full-duplex wireless communications and energy harvesting in wireless networks.

Frequent venues for their publications include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) where they have published four papers, Frontiers in Immunology, FEBS Letters, Nature, and Genes & Development.

Notable recent papers include:

  • The catalytic domain of the histone methyltransferase NSD2/MMSET is required for the generation of B1 cells in mice, 2020, FEBS Letters
  • Control of enhancer and promoter activation in the type I interferon response by the histone demethylase Kdm4d/JMJD2d, 2023, Frontiers in Immunology
  • A histone-like motif in yellow fever virus contributes to viral replication, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Chromatin mimicry by human JC virus, 2024, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Control of enhancer activation in the type I interferon response by the histone demethylase Kdm4d / JMJD2d, 2023, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Alexander Tarakhovsky collaborates frequently with a group of co-authors including Rab K. Prinjha, Rohit Chandwani, Terry Fang, Scott Dewell, and Uwe Schaefer.

Best Publications

  • Suppression of inflammation by a synthetic histone mimic

    Edwige Nicodeme;Kate L. Jeffrey;Uwe Schaefer;Soren Beinke

  • Blimp1 is a critical determinant of the germ cell lineage in mice

    Yasuhide Ohinata;Bernhard Payer;Dónal O'Carroll;Katia Ancelin

  • Essential Role of the Histone Methyltransferase G9a in Cocaine-induced Plasticity

    Ian Maze;Herbert E. Iii. Covington;David M. Dietz;Quincey LaPlant;Quincey LaPlant

  • Maternal microRNAs are essential for mouse zygotic development

    Fuchou Tang;Masahiro Kaneda;Dónal O’Carroll;Petra Hajkova

  • Ezh2 controls B cell development through histone H3 methylation and Igh rearrangement

    I-hsin Su;Ashwin Basavaraj;Andrew N. Krutchinsky;Oliver Hobert

  • Ezh2 Orchestrates Gene Expression for the Stepwise Differentiation of Tissue-Specific Stem Cells

    Elena Ezhkova;H. Amalia Pasolli;Joel S. Parker;Nicole Stokes

  • Morphogenesis in skin is governed by discrete sets of differentially expressed microRNAs

    Rui Yi;Dónal O'Carroll;Hilda A Pasolli;Zhihong Zhang

  • Transmembrane phosphoprotein Cbp regulates the activities of Src-family tyrosine kinases.

    Masahiro Kawabuchi;Yoshinori Satomi;Toshifumi Takao;Yasutsugu Shimonishi

  • Immunodeficiency in Protein Kinase Cβ-Deficient Mice

    Michael Leitges;Christian Schmedt;Rodolphe Guinamard;Jean Davoust

  • A role for CD5 in TCR-mediated signal transduction and thymocyte selection

    Alexander Tarakhovsky;Steven B. Kanner;Joachim Hombach;Jeffrey A. Ledbetter

  • MicroRNA biogenesis is required for mouse primordial germ cell development and spermatogenesis.

    Katsuhiko Hayashi;Susana M. Chuva de Sousa Lopes;Masahiro Kaneda;Fuchou Tang

  • Blimp1 Defines a Progenitor Population that Governs Cellular Input to the Sebaceous Gland

    Valerie Horsley;Dónal O'Carroll;Reuben Tooze;Yasuhide Ohinata

  • Defective antigen receptor-mediated proliferation of B and T cells in the absence of Vav

    A. Tarakhovsky;M. Turner;S. Schaal;P. J. Mee

  • Dicer-dependent microRNA pathway safeguards regulatory T cell function.

    Adrian Liston;Li-Fan Lu;Donal O'Carroll;Alexander Tarakhovsky

  • Ezh2, the histone methyltransferase of PRC2, regulates the balance between self-renewal and differentiation in the cerebral cortex

    João D. Pereira;Stephen N. Sansom;James Smith;Marc-Werner Dobenecker

  • Negative regulation of Toll-like receptor 4 signaling by the Toll-like receptor homolog RP105

    Senad Divanovic;Aurelien Trompette;Sowsan F Atabani;Rajat Madan

  • Abnormal development of secondary lymphoid tissues in lymphotoxin beta-deficient mice.

    Marat B. Alimzhanov;Dmitry V. Kuprash;Marie H. Kosco-Vilbois;Arne Luz

  • A Slicer-independent role for Argonaute 2 in hematopoiesis and the microRNA pathway

    Dónal O’Carroll;Ingrid Mecklenbrauker;Partha Pratim Das;Angela Santana

  • The Toll-like Receptor Protein Rp105 Regulates Lipopolysaccharide Signaling in B Cells

    Hirotaka Ogata;I-hsin Su;Kensuke Miyake;Yoshinori Nagai

  • Polycomb Group Protein Ezh2 Controls Actin Polymerization and Cell Signaling

    I-hsin Su;Marc-Werner Dobenecker;Ephraim Dickinson;Matthew Oser

Frequent Co-Authors

Rab K. Prinjha
Rab K. Prinjha GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)
Dónal O'Carroll
Dónal O'Carroll University of Edinburgh
Michel C. Nussenzweig
Michel C. Nussenzweig Rockefeller University
Vyacheslav Yurchenko
Vyacheslav Yurchenko University of Ostrava
Benjamin A. Garcia
Benjamin A. Garcia Washington University in St. Louis
M. Azim Surani
M. Azim Surani University of Cambridge
Klaus Rajewsky
Klaus Rajewsky Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine
Michael Leitges
Michael Leitges University of Oslo
Elaine Fuchs
Elaine Fuchs Rockefeller University
Sheila C. Barton
Sheila C. Barton University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry in the USA often opens doors to diverse online degrees and health-related career pathways. One such path is medical coding, a field in high demand, offering both flexibility and stable job opportunities. If you are curious about is medical billing and coding in demand, it’s worth noting the growing need for skilled professionals, especially with the shift toward electronic health records.

Aspiring coders should also be aware of the differences between certifications, such as ccs vs cpc, since your choice can impact both your job prospects and salary potential. Many students wonder how long does it take to become a medical coder. While programs vary, many online options allow you to qualify in as little as a year.

For those seeking advanced roles, consider an accredited online Health Information Management program. Look for the him degree to combine science knowledge with skills in technology and data. These paths can lead to rewarding careers in healthcare, research, or administrative roles.

Best Scientists Citing Alexander Tarakhovsky

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles