World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
94
Citations
55523
World Ranking
10252
National Ranking
5272

Joan H. Schiller publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joan H. Schiller sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 487 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Joan H. Schiller D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joan H. Schiller sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joan H. Schiller is affiliated with the University of Virginia in the United States. Their research work primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a significant focus on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Economics and Econometrics, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The scientist's research emphasizes topics related to Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations, Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Climate Change and Health Impacts, Air Quality and Health Impacts, Lung Cancer Research Studies, Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances, and Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers.

Frequent coauthors in Joan H. Schiller's research include Stephanie Thee, Mirjam Stahl, J. Tattersall-Wong, Fredine T. Lauer, and Arryn Ketter.

Joan H. Schiller has published extensively in several journals. The most common publication venues are:

  • Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Journal of Thoracic Oncology
  • UNC Libraries
  • The Oncologist

Recent publications by Joan H. Schiller include:

  • Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Without Driver Alterations: ASCO and OH (CCO) Joint Guideline Update, 2020, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Driver Alterations: ASCO and OH (CCO) Joint Guideline Update, 2021, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Air Pollution and Lung Cancer: A Review by International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Early Detection and Screening Committee, 2023, Journal of Thoracic Oncology
  • Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Without Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline, 2022, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline, 2022, Journal of Clinical Oncology

Best Publications

  • Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer

    Alan Sandler;Robert Gray;Michael C. Perry;Julie Brahmer

  • Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

    Joan H. Schiller;David Harrington;Chandra P. Belani;Corey Langer

  • Efficacy of Gefitinib, an Inhibitor of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase, in Symptomatic Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Trial

    Mark G. Kris;Ronald B. Natale;Roy S. Herbst;Thomas J. Lynch

  • Gefitinib in Combination With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase III Trial—INTACT 2

    Roy S. Herbst;Giuseppe Giaccone;Joan H. Schiller;Ronald B. Natale

  • Gefitinib in Combination With Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase III Trial—INTACT 1

    Giuseppe Giaccone;Roy S. Herbst;Christian Manegold;Giorgio Scagliotti

  • Lung cancer in never smokers — a different disease

    Sophie Sun;Joan H. Schiller;Adi F. Gazdar

  • Using Multiplexed Assays of Oncogenic Drivers in Lung Cancers to Select Targeted Drugs

    Mark G. Kris;Bruce E. Johnson;Lynne D. Berry;David J. Kwiatkowski

  • Topotecan Versus Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, and Vincristine for the Treatment of Recurrent Small-Cell Lung Cancer

    Joachim von Pawel;Joan H. Schiller;Frances A. Shepherd;Scott Z. Fields

  • [American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline update on chemotherapy for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer].

    Christopher G. Azzoli;Sherman Baker;Sarah Temin;William Pao

  • Cisplatin- Versus Carboplatin-Based Chemotherapy in First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis

    Andrea Ardizzoni;Luca Boni;Marcello Tiseo;Frank V. Fossella

  • Systemic Therapy for Stage IV Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update

    Gregory A. Masters;Sarah Temin;Christopher G. Azzoli;Giuseppe Giaccone

  • Phase III Study of Immediate Compared With Delayed Docetaxel After Front-Line Therapy With Gemcitabine Plus Carboplatin in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

    Panos M. Fidias;Shaker R. Dakhil;Alan P. Lyss;David M. Loesch

  • Randomized phase II/III trial of paclitaxel (P) plus carboplatin (C) with or without bevacizumab (NSC #704865) in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Trial - E4599

    A. B. Sandler;R. Gray;J. Brahmer;A. Dowlati

  • Outcomes for Elderly, Advanced-Stage Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Bevacizumab in Combination With Carboplatin and Paclitaxel: Analysis of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial 4599

    Suresh S. Ramalingam;Suzanne E. Dahlberg;Corey J. Langer;Robert Gray

  • Mass Spectrometry to Classify Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients for Clinical Outcome After Treatment With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Multicohort Cross-Institutional Study

    Fumiko Taguchi;Benjamin Solomon;Vanesa Gregorc;Heinrich Roder

  • Randomized Phase II Study of Erlotinib Plus Tivantinib Versus Erlotinib Plus Placebo in Previously Treated Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

    Lecia V. Sequist;Joachim von Pawel;Edward G. Garmey;Wallace L. Akerley

  • Efficacy of gemcitabine plus platinum chemotherapy compared with other platinum containing regimens in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of survival outcomes.

    T Le Chevalier;G Scagliotti;R Natale;S Danson

  • Therapy for Stage IV Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Without Driver Alterations: ASCO and OH (CCO) Joint Guideline Update

    Nasser H. Hanna;Bryan J. Schneider;Sarah Temin;Sherman Baker

  • Topotecan Versus Observation After Cisplatin Plus Etoposide in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: E7593—A Phase III Trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

    Joan H. Schiller;Sudeshna Adak;David Cella;Russell F. DeVore

  • Efficacy of Gefitinib, an Inhibitor of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase, in Symptomatic Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

    Mark G. Kris;Ronald B. Natale;Roy S. Herbst;Diane Prager

Frequent Co-Authors

David H. Johnson
David H. Johnson The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Ernest C. Borden
Ernest C. Borden Cleveland Clinic
Suresh S. Ramalingam
Suresh S. Ramalingam Emory University
Paul M. Sondel
Paul M. Sondel University of Wisconsin–Madison
Jacquelyn A. Hank
Jacquelyn A. Hank University of Wisconsin–Madison
Chandra P. Belani
Chandra P. Belani Penn State Cancer Institute
Roy S. Herbst
Roy S. Herbst Yale University
Julie R. Brahmer
Julie R. Brahmer Johns Hopkins University
James K V Willson
James K V Willson The University of Texas at Dallas
Minesh P. Mehta
Minesh P. Mehta University of Maryland, Baltimore

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn’t always start with medical school. There are multiple online degree options that offer flexible entry points into healthcare. For those interested in health information management, billing and coding classes online provide practical skills for one of the fastest-growing fields in the industry.

Nursing offers one of the most diverse and in-demand career pathways. Aspiring nurse leaders can advance their practice with nurse practitioner programs, many of which are available fully online. For those seeking affordable graduate options, the cheapest online MSN programs allow registered nurses to earn their master’s degree without putting their career on hold.

If you’re considering advanced roles in teaching, research, or healthcare leadership, online nursing doctoral programs can provide the highest level of training in the field. Whether you’re starting with entry-level credentials or aiming for a doctorate, these online pathways offer flexibility, accessibility, and a broad spectrum of healthcare career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Joan H. Schiller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles