World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 58 3477 3193 1373 1225 323 10393

Paul M. Sondel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul M. Sondel between 1972 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul M. Sondel published across 54 years, from 1972 to 2025, averaging 10.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 178 publications in 2023. 52 of the 590 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
50 100 150
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 178. Peak 178 publications in 2023. 1972: 2 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 3 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 6 publications 1984: 12 publications 1985: 9 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 13 publications 1988: 10 publications 1989: 13 publications 1990: 14 publications 1991: 11 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 12 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 28 publications 2023: 178 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 34 publications
1972 2025

590 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul M. Sondel: publications per year, 1972 to 2025
Year Publications
1972 2
1973 0
1974 0
1975 3
1976 2
1977 1
1978 0
1979 0
1980 1
1981 3
1982 2
1983 6
1984 12
1985 9
1986 6
1987 13
1988 10
1989 13
1990 14
1991 11
1992 9
1993 12
1994 7
1995 3
1996 8
1997 7
1998 4
1999 7
2000 3
2001 9
2002 3
2003 5
2004 9
2005 4
2006 4
2007 4
2008 8
2009 4
2010 3
2011 5
2012 10
2013 6
2014 7
2015 6
2016 8
2017 7
2018 11
2019 11
2020 21
2021 19
2022 28
2023 178
2024 18
2025 34
Total 590
Download as CSV

Paul M. Sondel publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul M. Sondel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 315–324 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 323 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106 323
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Paul M. Sondel D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul M. Sondel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162 58
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Paul M. Sondel is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines with a focus on medicine, biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology, and immunology and microbiology. The main subfields of their work include oncology, immunology, neurology, molecular biology, and radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging.

The scientist's research covers a range of topics that emphasize neuroblastoma research and treatments, immunotherapy and immune responses, cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers, CAR-T cell therapy research, cancer related to hypoxia and metabolism, monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies research, and broader cancer research and treatments.

Some of the recent publications by Paul M. Sondel include:

  • Low-dose targeted radionuclide therapy renders immunologically cold tumors responsive to immune checkpoint blockade (2021), published in Science Translational Medicine
  • Long-Term Follow-up of a Phase III Study of ch14.18 (Dinutuximab) + Cytokine Immunotherapy in Children with High-Risk Neuroblastoma: COG Study ANBL0032 (2021), published in Clinical Cancer Research
  • Irinotecan, Temozolomide, and Dinutuximab With GM-CSF in Children With Refractory or Relapsed Neuroblastoma: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group (2020), published in Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Depletion of tumor associated macrophages enhances local and systemic platelet-mediated anti-PD-1 delivery for post-surgery tumor recurrence treatment (2022), published in Nature Communications
  • Immunotherapy of Neuroblastoma: Facts and Hopes (2022), published in Clinical Cancer Research

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Amy K. Erbe
  • Alexander L. Rakhmilevich
  • Zachary S. Morris
  • Arika S. Feils
  • Anna Hoefges

The main publication venues for this researcher include:

  • Regular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts
  • Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
  • Cancer Research
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Best Publications

  • Recognition by human V gamma 9/V delta 2 T cells of a GroEL homolog on Daudi Burkitt's lymphoma cells

    Paul Fisch;Miroslav Malkovsky;Susan Kovats;Els Sturm

  • Homozygous deletions that simultaneously eliminate expressions of class I and class II antigens of EBV-transformed B-lymphoblastoid cells. I. Reduced proliferative responses of autologous and allogeneic T cells to mutant cells that have decreased expression of class II antigens

    Robert DeMars;Robert DeMars;Cecile C Chang;Cecile C Chang;Stephen Shaw;Stephen Shaw;Pamela J Reitnauer;Pamela J Reitnauer

  • Phase I Study of Chimeric Human/Murine Anti–Ganglioside GD2 Monoclonal Antibody (ch14.18) With Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor in Children With Neuroblastoma Immediately After Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation: A Children’s Cancer Group Study

    M. Fevzi Ozkaynak;Paul M. Sondel;Mark D. Krailo;Jacek Gan

  • Interferon-induced indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase activity in human mononuclear phagocytes.

    Joseph M. Carlin;Ernest C. Borden;Paul M. Sondel;Gerald I. Byrne

  • Implications of interferon-induced tryptophan catabolism in cancer, auto-immune diseases and AIDS.

    R. R. Brown;Y. Ozaki;S. P. Datta;Ernest C Borden

  • A Phase I Clinical Trial of the hu14.18-IL2 (EMD 273063) as a Treatment for Children with Refractory or Recurrent Neuroblastoma and Melanoma: a Study of the Children’s Oncology Group

    Kaci L. Osenga;Jacquelyn A. Hank;Mark R. Albertini;Jacek Gan

  • Phase I Clinical Trial of the Immunocytokine EMD 273063 in Melanoma Patients

    David M. King;Mark R. Albertini;Heidi Schalch;Jacquelyn A. Hank

  • Low-dose targeted radionuclide therapy renders immunologically cold tumors responsive to immune checkpoint blockade

    Ravi B. Patel;Reinier Hernandez;Peter Carlson;Joseph Grudzinski

  • Long-Term Follow-up of a Phase III Study of ch14.18 (Dinutuximab) + Cytokine Immunotherapy in Children with High-Risk Neuroblastoma: COG Study ANBL0032.

    Alice L. Yu;Alice L. Yu;Andrew L. Gilman;M. Fevzi Ozkaynak;Arlene Naranjo

  • Genotypes of NK Cell KIR Receptors, Their Ligands, and Fcγ Receptors in the Response of Neuroblastoma Patients to Hu14.18-IL2 Immunotherapy

    David C. Delgado;Jacquelyn A. Hank;Jill Kolesar;David Lorentzen

  • Repetitive weekly cycles of recombinant human interleukin-2: responses of renal carcinoma with acceptable toxicity.

    Jeff A. Sosman;Peter C. Kohler;Jacquelyn Hank;Karen H. Moore

  • A multigene family on human chromosome 12 encodes natural killer-cell lectins.

    Toshio Yabe;Cynthia McSherry;Fritz H. Bach;Paul Fisch

  • Irinotecan, Temozolomide, and Dinutuximab With GM-CSF in Children With Refractory or Relapsed Neuroblastoma: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group.

    Rajen Mody;Alice L Yu;Alice L Yu;Arlene Naranjo;Fan F Zhang

  • Anti-CD40 antibody induces antitumor and antimetastatic effects: the role of NK cells.

    Joel G. Turner;Alexander L. Rakhmilevich;Lyudmila Burdelya;Zane Neal

  • Lymphokines and cytokines as cancer treatment. Immunotherapy realized.

    Ernest C. Borden;Paul M. Sondel

  • Destruction of autologous human lymphocytes by interleukin 2-activated cytotoxic cells.

    P M Sondel;J A Hank;P C Kohler;B P Chen

  • Activation of human effector cells by a tumor reactive recombinant anti-ganglioside GD2 interleukin-2 fusion protein (ch14.18-IL2).

    Jacquelyn A. Hank;Jean E. Surfus;Jacek Gan;Peter Jaeger

  • CD40 Ligation Activates Murine Macrophages via an IFN-γ-Dependent Mechanism Resulting in Tumor Cell Destruction In Vitro

    Ilia N. Buhtoiarov;Hillary Lum;Gideon Berke;Donna M. Paulnock

  • Human V gamma 9-V delta 2 T cell receptor-gamma delta lymphocytes show specificity to Daudi Burkitt's lymphoma cells.

    E. Sturm;E. Braakman;P. Fisch;R. J. Vreugdenhil

  • Evaluating natural killer cell cytotoxicity against solid tumors using a microfluidic model.

    Jose M. Ayuso;Jose M. Ayuso;Regan Truttschel;Max M. Gong;Mouhita Humayun

  • Antigenic requirements for triggering of cytotoxic T lymphocytes.

    Fritz H. Bach;Catherine Grillot-Courvalin;Oded J. Kuperman;Hans W. Sollinger

Frequent Co-Authors

Jacquelyn A. Hank
Jacquelyn A. Hank University of Wisconsin–Madison
Stephen D. Gillies
Stephen D. Gillies MSD (United States)
Jeffrey A. Sosman
Jeffrey A. Sosman Northwestern University
Ralph A. Reisfeld
Ralph A. Reisfeld Scripps Research Institute
Alice L. Yu
Alice L. Yu University of California, San Diego
Wendy B. London
Wendy B. London Harvard University
John M. Maris
John M. Maris Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Robert DeMars
Robert DeMars University of Wisconsin–Madison
Joan H. Schiller
Joan H. Schiller University of Virginia
Paul M. Harari
Paul M. Harari University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to microbiology opens up diverse career pathways. For instance, pursuing healthcare-focused programs can lead to roles like a child life specialist, a profession where understanding biology and human development is crucial. Interested students often research how much do child life specialists make to gauge financial prospects in the field.

For those with unique backgrounds, including individuals with previous convictions, it's encouraging to note the availability of options like the best degrees for felons. Many online programs provide pathways to careers in healthcare and science that are accessible and lead to rewarding opportunities.

Another promising direction is becoming a functional medicine NP, which combines traditional microbiology knowledge with patient-centered care. This role is growing in demand as holistic health approaches become more mainstream.

For those drawn to the administrative or coding side of healthcare, obtaining a CPC certification can be a smart move. Understanding the cpc certification salary and career paths helps prospective students evaluate the benefits of this certification, especially when paired with a science background.

Choosing the right online degree linked to microbiology can open multiple doors in the healthcare and science sectors, each with unique benefits and career growth potential.

Best Scientists Citing Paul M. Sondel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles