World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Chemistry
Denmark
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 109 823 725 5 5 318 85328

Jan Rossmeisl publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jan Rossmeisl between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jan Rossmeisl published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 18.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 60 publications in 2022. 74 of the 452 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 60. Peak 60 publications in 2022. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 5 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 22 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 29 publications 2022: 60 publications 2023: 43 publications 2024: 46 publications 2025: 28 publications
2001 2025

452 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jan Rossmeisl: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 0
2003 2
2004 2
2005 1
2006 5
2007 9
2008 9
2009 11
2010 19
2011 22
2012 22
2013 18
2014 17
2015 14
2016 22
2017 17
2018 20
2019 22
2020 13
2021 29
2022 60
2023 43
2024 46
2025 28
Total 452
Download as CSV

Jan Rossmeisl publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Rossmeisl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–320 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 318 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764 318
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Jan Rossmeisl D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Rossmeisl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 108–109 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 109 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68 109
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Chemistry in Denmark Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Chemistry in Denmark Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Chemistry in Denmark Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Chemistry in Denmark Leader Award

Overview

Jan Rossmeisl is affiliated with the University of Copenhagen in Denmark, contributing extensively to the fields of engineering, energy, and materials science. Their research centers on topics related to sustainable energy solutions and catalytic processes within materials science.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Engineering
  • Energy
  • Materials Science

Rossmeisl's work further focuses on subfields such as:

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Materials Chemistry
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Catalysis

Their research prominently covers topics like:

  • Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • High Entropy Alloys Studies
  • Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
  • CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
  • High-Temperature Coating Behaviors
  • Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jan Rossmeisl include:

  • Alexander Bagger
  • Jack K. Pedersen
  • Matthias Arenz
  • Christian M. Clausen
  • Hao Wan

The scientist has published multiple papers, some of the recent noteworthy publications are:

  • High-Entropy Alloys as Catalysts for the CO 2 and CO Reduction Reactions (2020, ACS Catalysis)
  • P-block single-metal-site tin/nitrogen-doped carbon fuel cell cathode catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction (2020, Nature Materials)
  • What Makes High-Entropy Alloys Exceptional Electrocatalysts? (2021, Angewandte Chemie International Edition)
  • Morphology and mechanism of highly selective Cu(II) oxide nanosheet catalysts for carbon dioxide electroreduction (2021, Nature Communications)
  • 2022 roadmap on low temperature electrochemical CO2 reduction (2022, Journal of Physics Energy)

Rossmeisl frequently publishes in journals such as:

  • ACS Catalysis
  • Angewandte Chemie
  • Angewandte Chemie International Edition
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
  • Journal of Catalysis

Best Publications

  • Origin of the Overpotential for Oxygen Reduction at a Fuel-Cell Cathode

    J. K. Nørskov;J. Rossmeisl;and A. Logadottir;L. Lindqvist

  • Universality in Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalysis on Oxide Surfaces

    Isabela C. Man;Hai-Yan Su;Federico Calle-Vallejo;Heine Anton Hansen

  • Towards the computational design of solid catalysts

    Jens Kehlet Nørskov;Thomas Bligaard;Jan Rossmeisl;Claus Hviid Christensen

  • How copper catalyzes the electroreduction of carbon dioxide into hydrocarbon fuels

    Andrew Peterson;Frank Abild-Pedersen;Felix Studt;Jan Rossmeisl

  • Alloys of platinum and early transition metals as oxygen reduction electrocatalysts

    J. Greeley;I. E. L. Stephens;A. S. Bondarenko;T. P. Johansson

  • Electrolysis of water on oxide surfaces

    Jan Rossmeisl;Z.-W. Qu;H. Zhu;G.-J. Kroes

  • Changing the Activity of Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction by Tuning the Surface Electronic Structure

    Vojislav R. Stamenković;Bongjinsimon Mun;Karl Johann Jakob Mayrhofer;Philip N. Ross

  • Electrolysis of water on (oxidized) metal surfaces

    Jan Rossmeisl;Ashildur Logadottir;Jens Kehlet Nørskov

  • Scaling properties of adsorption energies for hydrogen-containing molecules on transition-metal surfaces.

    F. Abild-Pedersen;J. Greeley;F. Studt;J. Rossmeisl

  • A theoretical evaluation of possible transition metal electro-catalysts for N2 reduction

    Egill Skulason;Egill Skulason;Thomas Bligaard;Thomas Bligaard;Thomas Bligaard;Sigrıdur Gudmundsdottir;Felix Studt

  • Enabling direct H2O2 production through rational electrocatalyst design

    Samira Siahrostami;Arnau Verdaguer-Casadevall;Mohammadreza Karamad;Davide Deiana

  • Modeling the Electrochemical Hydrogen Oxidation and Evolution Reactions on the Basis of Density Functional Theory Calculations

    Egill Skulason;Vladimir Tripkovic;Mårten Björketun;Sigridur Gudmundsdottir

  • Understanding the electrocatalysis of oxygen reduction on platinum and its alloys

    Ifan E. L. Stephens;Alexander S. Bondarenko;Alexander S. Bondarenko;Ulrik Grønbjerg;Jan Rossmeisl

  • Understanding activity and selectivity of metal-nitrogen-doped carbon catalysts for electrochemical reduction of CO 2

    Wen Ju;Alexander Bagger;Guang-Ping Hao;Ana Sofia Varela;Ana Sofia Varela

  • Toward the Decentralized Electrochemical Production of H2O2: A Focus on the Catalysis

    Sungeun Yang;Arnau Verdaguer-Casadevall;Logi Arnarson;Luca Silvioli

  • Tuning the activity of Pt alloy electrocatalysts by means of the lanthanide contraction

    María Escudero-Escribano;María Escudero-Escribano;Paolo Malacrida;Martin H. Hansen;Martin H. Hansen;Ulrik G. Vej-Hansen

  • Density functional theory calculations for the hydrogen evolution reaction in an electrochemical double layer on the Pt(111) electrode.

    Egill Skúlason;Egill Skúlason;Gustav S. Karlberg;Jan Rossmeisl;Thomas Bligaard;Thomas Bligaard

  • Electrochemical CO2 Reduction: A Classification Problem.

    Alexander Bagger;Wen Ju;Ana Sofia Varela;Peter Strasser

  • High-Entropy Alloys as a Discovery Platform for Electrocatalysis

    Thomas A.A. Batchelor;Jack K. Pedersen;Simon H. Winther;Ivano E. Castelli

  • Trends in the Electrochemical Synthesis of H2O2: Enhancing Activity and Selectivity by Electrocatalytic Site Engineering

    Arnau Verdaguer-Casadevall;Davide Deiana;Mohammadreza Karamad;Samira Siahrostami

  • First principles calculations and experimental insight into methane steam reforming over transition metal catalysts

    Glenn Jones;Jon Geest Jakobsen;Signe Sarah Shim;Jesper Kleis

Frequent Co-Authors

Jens K. Nørskov
Jens K. Nørskov Technical University of Denmark
Ifan E. L. Stephens
Ifan E. L. Stephens Imperial College London
Ib Chorkendorff
Ib Chorkendorff Technical University of Denmark
Thomas Bligaard
Thomas Bligaard Technical University of Denmark
Federico Calle-Vallejo
Federico Calle-Vallejo University of Barcelona
Felix Studt
Felix Studt Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Jeffrey Greeley
Jeffrey Greeley Purdue University West Lafayette
Frank Abild-Pedersen
Frank Abild-Pedersen SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
Peter Strasser
Peter Strasser Technical University of Berlin
Tejs Vegge
Tejs Vegge Technical University of Denmark

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to a wide range of career pathways beyond traditional laboratory roles. For those interested in healthcare, understanding is it hard to become a pharmacist offers insight into the rigorous education and training required to enter this vital profession. Pharmacists play a crucial role in medication management and patient care, making it a rewarding but challenging path.

Alternatively, combining chemistry with forensic science can lead to specialized careers such as becoming an autopsy technician. This role demands a strong foundation in both biological sciences and meticulous attention to detail, often involving hands-on work in medico-legal investigations.

For students seeking flexible learning options, pursuing an online bachelor's degree in forensic science can provide essential knowledge for careers in criminal justice, toxicology, and crime scene analysis. At the graduate level, an online forensic psychology masters degree expands opportunities into behavioral analysis and legal consultancy, blending chemistry insights with psychological expertise.

These interdisciplinary paths highlight the diverse applications of chemistry and demonstrate how online degrees can support career advancement in dynamic fields.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Rossmeisl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles