World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
135
Citations
110634
World Ranking
2013
National Ranking
14

Tony Mok publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tony Mok sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 790 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Tony Mok D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tony Mok sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 135 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tony Mok is affiliated with the Chinese University of Hong Kong in China, focusing primarily on medical research within pulmonary and respiratory medicine as well as oncology. Their work concentrates significantly on lung cancer treatments, mutations, and diagnostic methods, reflecting expertise in the intersection of medical science and cancer research.

The scientist's research output is substantial in the field of medicine, covering a total of 619 publications. Key subfields of study include pulmonary and respiratory medicine with 305 publications, oncology with 234 publications, cancer research with 49 publications, molecular biology with 27 publications, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging with 20 publications.

Main topics of their work center on lung cancer treatments and mutations (352 publications), cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers (152 publications), lung cancer research studies (148 publications), lung cancer diagnosis and treatment (142 publications), colorectal cancer treatments and studies (96 publications), cancer genomics and diagnostics (92 publications), and gastric cancer management and outcomes (42 publications).

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Tony Mok include:

  • Yi-Long Wu (61 joint publications)
  • Solange Peters (47 joint publications)
  • Byoung Chul Cho (29 joint publications)
  • Enriqueta Felip (28 joint publications)
  • Filippo de Marinis (27 joint publications)

The scientist has contributed extensively to several prominent journals. Notable publication venues include the Journal of Clinical Oncology with 44 publications, Annals of Oncology with 43 publications, Journal of Thoracic Oncology with 34 publications, Lung Cancer with 19 publications, and Cancer Research with 16 publications.

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Tony Mok are:

  • "First-Line Lorlatinib or Crizotinib in Advanced ALK -Positive Lung Cancer," 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Updated Overall Survival and PD-L1 Subgroup Analysis of Patients With Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide (IMpower133)," 2021, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • "Oncogene-addicted metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up," 2023, Annals of Oncology
  • "Updated overall survival and final progression-free survival data for patients with treatment-naive advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer in the ALEX study," 2020, Annals of Oncology
  • "Liquid Biopsy for Advanced NSCLC: A Consensus Statement From the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer," 2021, Journal of Thoracic Oncology

Best Publications

  • Gefitinib or Carboplatin–Paclitaxel in Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma

    Tony S. Mok;Yi Long Wu;Sumitra Thongprasert;Chih Hsin Yang

  • MET Amplification Leads to Gefitinib Resistance in Lung Cancer by Activating ERBB3 Signaling

    Jeffrey A. Engelman;Kreshnik Zejnullahu;Tetsuya Mitsudomi;Youngchul Song

  • Crizotinib versus Chemotherapy in Advanced ALK-Positive Lung Cancer

    Alice T. Shaw;Dong Wan Kim;Kazuhiko Nakagawa;Takashi Seto

  • Phase III Study of Afatinib or Cisplatin Plus Pemetrexed in Patients With Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma With EGFR Mutations

    Lecia V. Sequist;James Chih-Hsin Yang;Nobuyuki Yamamoto;Kenneth John O'Byrne

  • First-line crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK-positive lung cancer

    Benjamin J. Solomon;Tony Shu-kam Mok;Dong Wan Kim;Yi Long Wu

  • Osimertinib or Platinum-Pemetrexed in EGFR T790M-Positive Lung Cancer.

    Tony S. Mok;Yi Long Wu;Myung Ju Ahn;Marina C. Garassino

  • Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for previously untreated, PD-L1-expressing, locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-042): a randomised, open-label, controlled, phase 3 trial

    Tony S.K. Mok;Yi Long Wu;Iveta Kudaba;Dariusz M. Kowalski

  • First-Line Atezolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

    Leora Horn;Aaron S. Mansfield;Aleksandra Szczęsna;Libor Havel

  • Alectinib versus Crizotinib in Untreated ALK-Positive Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

    Solange Peters;D. Ross Camidge;Alice T. Shaw;Shirish Gadgeel

  • Gefitinib versus docetaxel in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (INTEREST): a randomised phase III trial

    Edward S. Kim;Vera Hirsh;Tony Mok;Mark A. Socinski

  • Biomarker Analyses and Final Overall Survival Results From a Phase III, Randomized, Open-Label, First-Line Study of Gefitinib Versus Carboplatin/Paclitaxel in Clinically Selected Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Asia (IPASS)

    Masahiro Fukuoka;Yi Long Wu;Sumitra Thongprasert;Patrapim Sunpaweravong

  • Afatinib versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy for EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma (LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6): analysis of overall survival data from two randomised, phase 3 trials

    James Chih Hsin Yang;Yi Long Wu;Martin Schuler;Martin Sebastian

  • Afatinib versus gefitinib as first-line treatment of patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (LUX-Lung 7): a phase 2B, open-label, randomised controlled trial

    Keunchil Park;Eng Huat Tan;Ken O'Byrne;Li Zhang

  • Preexistence and Clonal Selection of MET Amplification in EGFR Mutant NSCLC

    Alexa B. Turke;Kreshnik Zejnullahu;Yi Long Wu;Youngchul Song

  • Dacomitinib versus gefitinib as first-line treatment for patients with EGFR-mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (ARCHER 1050): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

    Yi-Long Wu;Ying Cheng;Xiangdong Zhou;Ki Hyeong Lee

  • Blood-based tumor mutational burden as a predictor of clinical benefit in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with atezolizumab

    David R. Gandara;Sarah M. Paul;Marcin Kowanetz;Erica Schleifman

  • Clinical activity of afatinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring uncommon EGFR mutations: a combined post-hoc analysis of LUX-Lung 2, LUX-Lung 3, and LUX-Lung 6.

    James C.H. Yang;Lecia V. Sequist;Sarayut Lucien Geater;Chun Ming Tsai

  • Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (IMpower150): key subgroup analyses of patients with EGFR mutations or baseline liver metastases in a randomised, open-label phase 3 trial.

    Martin Reck;Tony S K Mok;Makoto Nishio;Robert M Jotte

  • Osimertinib or platinum–pemetrexed in EGFR T790M–positive lung cancer

    T.S. Mok;Y.-L. Wu;M.-J. Ahn;M.C. Garassino

  • BiomarkerAnalysesandFinalOverallSurvivalResultsFroma PhaseIII,Randomized,Open-Label,First-LineStudyofGefitinib VersusCarboplatin/PaclitaxelinClinicallySelectedPatientsWith AdvancedNon-Small-CellLungCancerinAsia(IPASS)

    Masahiro Fukuoka;Yi-Long Wu;Sumitra Thongprasert;Patrapim Sunpaweravong

Frequent Co-Authors

Yi-Long Wu
Yi-Long Wu Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital
Winnie Yeo
Winnie Yeo Chinese University of Hong Kong
James Chih-Hsin Yang
James Chih-Hsin Yang National Taiwan University
Kenneth J. O'Byrne
Kenneth J. O'Byrne Queensland University of Technology
Anthony T.C. Chan
Anthony T.C. Chan Chinese University of Hong Kong
Philip J. Johnson
Philip J. Johnson University of Liverpool
Luis Paz-Ares
Luis Paz-Ares Complutense University of Madrid
Michael Boyer
Michael Boyer University of Utah
Kazuhiko Nakagawa
Kazuhiko Nakagawa Kindai University
Lecia V. Sequist
Lecia V. Sequist Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring pathways beyond traditional medical degrees in the USA can open doors to diverse and rewarding healthcare careers. Many students and professionals are turning to online programs for flexibility, affordability, and faster completion times.

For those interested in mental health, accredited psychiatric np programs offer a direct route into advanced practice psychiatric nursing. These programs can often be completed quickly and entirely online, allowing for career advancement without prolonged time away from work.

If you’re drawn to leadership roles in hospitals or clinics, a health administration degree could be an excellent next step. There are numerous affordable online options, some even recognized for their quality and support.

For those considering a Master’s in Healthcare Administration, researching the cost of mha degree is key, as tuition varies considerably. Affordable programs make advancing your career more accessible.

Lastly, nurses seeking top clinical leadership roles may benefit from a 1 year dnp program online. These short and intensive doctorates prepare graduates for the highest levels of nursing practice.

Best Scientists Citing Tony Mok

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles