World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
46
Citations
8373
World Ranking
6685
National Ranking
2904

Michael M. Behbehani publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael M. Behbehani sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 96 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Michael M. Behbehani D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael M. Behbehani sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael M. Behbehani is affiliated with the University of Cincinnati Medical Center in the United States. Their academic profile highlights a professional connection with a notable medical institution, suggesting involvement in clinical or biomedical research within this setting.

Although there is no detailed information available on published papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, or specific research fields, the association with a major medical center implies engagement in medical science or healthcare-related disciplines.

The absence of data on recent papers, topics of work, awards, or book publications limits the specific insights into their research contributions, areas of expertise, or recognitions. However, such a profile is indicative of an active role in the academic or clinical research environment typical of a university-affiliated medical professional.

Best Publications

  • Functional characteristics of the midbrain periaqueductal gray

    Michael M. Behbehani

  • Connections between the central nucleus of the amygdala and the midbrain periaqueductal gray: Topography and reciprocity

    Tilat A. Rizvi;Matthew Ennis;Michael M. Behbehani;Michael T. Shipley

  • Evidence that an excitatory connection between the periaqueductal gray and nucleus raphe magnus mediates stimulation produced analgesia.

    Michael M. Behbehani;Michael M. Behbehani;Howard L. Fields;Howard L. Fields

  • c-fos regulates neuronal excitability and survival.

    Jianhua Zhang;Dongsheng Zhang;Jill Slane McQuade;Michael Behbehani

  • Deficiency in Na,K-ATPase α Isoform Genes Alters Spatial Learning, Motor Activity, and Anxiety in Mice

    Amy E. Moseley;Michael T. Williams;Tori L. Schaefer;Cynthia S. Bohanan

  • The effect of GABA and its antagonists on midbrain periaqueductal gray neurons in the rat

    Michael M. Behbehani;Maorong Jiang;Sharon D. Chandler;Matthew Ennis

  • Projections from the periaqueductal gray to the rostromedial pericoerulear region and nucleus locus coeruleus: anatomic and physiologic studies.

    M Ennis;M Behbehani;M T Shipley;E J Van Bockstaele

  • Enantiomer-specific effects of an intravenously administered arrhythmogenic dose of bupivacaine on neurons of the nucleus tractus solitarius and the cardiovascular system in the anesthetized rat.

    Donald D. Denson;Michael M. Behbehani;Richard V. Gregg

  • Directionally specific changes in arterial pressure induce differential patterns of fos expression in discrete areas of the rat brainstem: a double-labeling study for Fos and catecholamines.

    A. Z. Murphy;M. Ennis;M. T. Shipley;M. M. Behbehani

  • Interactions between the lateral hypothalamus and the periaqueductal gray

    M M Behbehani;M R Park;M E Clement

  • Stimulation of the rat subthalamic nucleus is neuroprotective following significant nigral dopamine neuron loss

    A.L. Spieles-Engemann;M.M. Behbehani;T.J. Collier;S.L. Wohlgenant

  • Topographical Specificity of Forebrain Inputs to the Midbrain Periaqueductal Gray: Evidence for Discrete Longitudinally Organized Input Columns

    Michael T. Shipley;Matthew Ennis;Tilat A. Rizvi;Michael M. Behbehani

  • A mechanism for the analgesic effect of neurotensin as revealed by behavioral and electrophysiological techniques

    M.M. Behbehani;A. Pert

  • Cardiovascular toxicity of local anesthetics: an alternative hypothesis.

    Richard D. Thomas;Michael M. Behbehani;Dennis E. Coyle;Donald D. Denson

  • Ascending and descending projections from nucleus reticularis magnocellularis and nucleus reticularis gigantocellularis: an autoradiographic and horseradish peroxidase study in the rat

    Unknown

  • Subthalamic Nucleus Stimulation Increases Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor in the Nigrostriatal System and Primary Motor Cortex

    Anne L. Spieles-Engemann;Kathy Steece-Collier;Michael M. Behbehani;Timothy J. Collier

  • Physiologic evidence for a projection from periaqueductal gray to nucleus raphe magnus in the rat.

    Scott L. Pomeroy;Michael M. Behbehani

  • Nucleus cuneiformis and pain modulation: anatomy and behavioral pharmacology.

    Frank P. Zemlan;Michael M. Behbehani

  • Preoptic projections to Barringon's nucleus and the pericoerulear region: Architecture and terminal organization

    Tilat A. Rizvi;Matthew Ennis;Gary Aston-Jones;Maorong Jiang

  • An electrophysiological characterization of the projection from the central nucleus of the amygdala to the periaqueductal gray of the rat: the role of opioid receptors

    Tamara M. Da Costa Gomez;Michael M. Behbehani

  • Evidence for GABAB-mediated inhibition of transmission from the olfactory nerve to mitral cells in the rat olfactory bulb.

    W.T. Nickell;M.M. Behbehani;M.T. Shipley

Frequent Co-Authors

Anne Z. Murphy
Anne Z. Murphy Georgia State University
Michael T. Shipley
Michael T. Shipley University of Maryland, Baltimore
John R. Dedman
John R. Dedman University of Cincinnati Medical Center
Jerry B. Lingrel
Jerry B. Lingrel University of Cincinnati
Gary Aston-Jones
Gary Aston-Jones Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Douglas K. Anderson
Douglas K. Anderson University of Florida
Joe Z. Tsien
Joe Z. Tsien Augusta University
Michael T. Williams
Michael T. Williams University of Cincinnati Medical Center
Jianhua Zhang
Jianhua Zhang The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Alvin J. Beitz
Alvin J. Beitz University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Michael M. Behbehani

Recently Published Articles