World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
50
Citations
7800
World Ranking
5806
National Ranking
2555

Michael M. Morgan publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael M. Morgan sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 169 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Michael M. Morgan D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael M. Morgan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael M. Morgan is affiliated with Washington State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a focus on Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience, Pharmacology, and Mechanical Engineering.

The main topics in Morgan's research include:

  • Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
  • Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Opioid Use Disorder Treatment

Recent publications by Michael M. Morgan include:

  • Use of home cage wheel running to assess the behavioural effects of administering a mu/delta opioid receptor heterodimer antagonist for spontaneous morphine withdrawal in the rat, 2020, Behavioural Brain Research
  • Sex differences in the impact of pain, morphine administration and morphine withdrawal on quality of life in rats, 2022, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Additional papers related to their research context, where Morgan is a co-author or relates to similar topics, include:

  • 'Reinventing the wheel' to advance the development of pain therapeutics, 2020, Behavioural Pharmacology
  • Social housing promotes recovery of wheel running depressed by inflammatory pain and morphine withdrawal in male rats, 2020, Behavioural Brain Research
  • Inducible Forward Programming of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells to Hemato-endothelial Progenitor Cells with Hematopoietic Progenitor Potential, 2020, Stem Cell Reports

Frequently, Michael M. Morgan collaborates with the following researchers:

  • Jonah D. Stickney
  • Kristin Ataras
  • Ram Kandasamy
  • Danielle L. Peecher
  • John M. Streicher

The predominant venues where Morgan's work is published are:

  • Behavioural Brain Research
  • Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
  • Journal of Pain
  • Behavioural Pharmacology
  • Stem Cell Reports

Best Publications

  • Lorcaserin, a novel selective human 5-hydroxytryptamine2C agonist: in vitro and in vivo pharmacological characterization.

    William J. Thomsen;Andrew J. Grottick;Frederique Menzaghi;Hazel Reyes-Saldana

  • Disinhibition of off-cells and antinociception produced by an opioid action within the rostral ventromedial medulla

    M.M. Heinricher;M.M. Morgan;V. Tortorici;H.L. Fields

  • Analysis of opioid efficacy, tolerance, addiction and dependence from cell culture to human

    Michael M Morgan;MacDonald J Christie

  • Direct and indirect actions of morphine on medullary neurons that modulate nociception.

    M.M. Heinricher;M.M. Morgan;H.L. Fields

  • Eph/Ephrin signaling in injury and inflammation.

    Mark G. Coulthard;Michael Morgan;Trent M. Woodruff;Thiruma V. Arumugam

  • GABAergic modulation of the analgesic effects of morphine microinjected in the ventral periaqueductal gray matter of the rat

    Antoine Depaulis;Michael M. Morgan;John C. Liebeskind

  • Periaqueductal gray neurons project to spinally projecting GABAergic neurons in the rostral ventromedial medulla

    Michael M. Morgan;Kelsey L. Whittier;Deborah M. Hegarty;Sue A. Aicher

  • Microinjection of morphine into the rostral ventromedial medulla produces greater antinociception in male compared to female rats

    Jill S Boyer;Michael M Morgan;Rebecca M Craft

  • Pros and Cons of Clinically Relevant Methods to Assess Pain in Rodents.

    Anke Tappe-Theodor;Tamara King;Michael M. Morgan

  • Circuitry linking opioid-sensitive nociceptive modulatory systems in periaqueductal gray and spinal cord with rostral ventromedial medulla.

    M.M. Morgan;M.M. Heinricher;H.L. Fields

  • The Influence of Non-Nociceptive Factors on Hot-Plate Latency in Rats

    Amanda Gunn;Erin N. Bobeck;Ceri Weber;Michael M. Morgan

  • Stimulation of the periaqueductal gray matter inhibits nociception at the supraspinal as well as spinal level.

    Michael M. Morgan;Jin-Hun Sohn;John C. Liebeskind

  • Antinociception mediated by the periaqueductal gray is attenuated by orphanin FQ

    Michael M. Morgan;Judith E. Grisel;Carolyn S. Robbins;David K. Grandy

  • Immobility and flight associated with antinociception produced by activation of the ventral and lateral/dorsal regions of the rat periaqueductal gray.

    M.M. Morgan;P.K. Whitney;M.S. Gold

  • Chronic nicotine and withdrawal effects on body weight and food and water consumption in female rats.

    Edward D. Levin;Michael M. Morgan;Caroline Galvez;Gaylord D. Ellison

  • Hydrogen peroxide enhances signal-responsive arachidonic acid release from neurons: role of mitogen-activated protein kinase

    Sujon Samanta;Michael S. Perkinton;Michael Morgan;Robert J. Williams

  • PAG Mu Opioid Receptor Activation Underlies Sex Differences in Morphine Antinociception

    Scott A. Bernal;Michael M. Morgan;Rebecca M. Craft

  • Pronounced changes in the activity of nociceptive modulatory neurons in the rostral ventromedial medulla in response to prolonged thermal noxious stimuli.

    M. M. Morgan;H. L. Fields

  • Contribution of dopamine receptors to periaqueductal gray-mediated antinociception

    Paul J. Meyer;Paul J. Meyer;Michael M. Morgan;Laura B. Kozell;Susan L. Ingram

  • Morphine Preferentially Activates the Periaqueductal Gray – Rostral Ventromedial Medullary Pathway in the Male Rat: A Potential Mechanism for Sex Differences in Antinociception

    Dayna R. Loyd;Michael M. Morgan;Anne Z. Murphy

Frequent Co-Authors

Sue A. Aicher
Sue A. Aicher Oregon Health & Science University
Mary M. Heinricher
Mary M. Heinricher Oregon Health & Science University
Howard L. Fields
Howard L. Fields University of California, San Francisco
Christoph Stein
Christoph Stein Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Michael S. Gold
Michael S. Gold University of Pittsburgh
Edward D. Levin
Edward D. Levin Duke University
MacDonald J. Christie
MacDonald J. Christie University of Sydney
Pascal Carrive
Pascal Carrive University of New South Wales
Gaylord Ellison
Gaylord Ellison University of California, Los Angeles
Anne Z. Murphy
Anne Z. Murphy Georgia State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Michael M. Morgan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles