World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
55
Citations
19196
World Ranking
4198
National Ranking
1980

Stephen S. Intille publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen S. Intille sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 116 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Stephen S. Intille D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen S. Intille sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen S. Intille is affiliated with Northeastern University in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on psychology and medicine, with significant work in applied psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, physiology, general health professions, and public health, environmental, and occupational health.

The scientist's work covers multiple main topics, including behavioral health and interventions, physical activity and health, mental health research topics, digital mental health interventions, mobile health and mHealth applications, spinal cord injury research, and obesity, physical activity, and diet.

Frequent publication venues for their research include:

  • Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
  • JMIR Formative Research
  • JMIR mhealth and uhealth
  • Journal of Physical Activity and Health
  • Psychology of sport and exercise

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Stephen S. Intille include:

  • "Talk2Care: An LLM-based Voice Assistant for Communication between Healthcare Providers and Older Adults", 2024, Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
  • "Towards consensus in conceptualizing and operationalizing physical activity maintenance", 2022, Psychology of sport and exercise
  • "Intensive Longitudinal Data Collection Using Microinteraction Ecological Momentary Assessment: Pilot and Preliminary Results", 2021, JMIR Formative Research
  • "MixWILD: A program for examining the effects of variance and slope of time-varying variables in intensive longitudinal data", 2020, Behavior Research Methods
  • "Measuring Criterion Validity of Microinteraction Ecological Momentary Assessment (Micro-EMA): Exploratory Pilot Study With Physical Activity Measurement", 2021, JMIR mhealth and uhealth

Their research collaborations frequently involve the following co-authors:

  • Genevieve F. Dunton
  • Aditya Ponnada
  • Shirlene Wang
  • Weilin Wang
  • Jixin Li

Stephen S. Intille's contributions span both theoretical and applied work within their fields of study, emphasizing longitudinal data collection, physical activity measurement, and digital health technologies aimed at health behavior and intervention strategies.

Best Publications

  • Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration data

    Ling Bao;Stephen S. Intille

  • Activity Recognition in the Home Using Simple and Ubiquitous Sensors

    Emmanuel Munguia Tapia;Stephen S. Intille;Kent Larson

  • Large Occlusion Stereo

    Aaron F. Bobick;Stephen S. Intille

  • Real-Time Recognition of Physical Activities and Their Intensities Using Wireless Accelerometers and a Heart Rate Monitor

    E.M. Tapia;S.S. Intille;W. Haskell;K. Larson

  • Health and the mobile phone.

    Kevin Patrick;William G. Griswold;William G. Griswold;Fred Raab;Fred Raab;Stephen S. Intille

  • Designing a home of the future

    S.S. Intille

  • A long-term evaluation of sensing modalities for activity recognition

    Beth Logan;Jennifer Healey;Matthai Philipose;Emmanuel Munguia Tapia

  • The KidsRoom: A Perceptually-Based Interactive and Immersive Story Environment

    Aaron F. Bobick;Stephen S. Intille;James W. Davis;Freedom Baird

  • Using context-aware computing to reduce the perceived burden of interruptions from mobile devices

    Joyce Ho;Stephen S. Intille

  • Using a live-in laboratory for ubiquitous computing research

    Stephen S. Intille;Kent Larson;Emmanuel Munguia Tapia;Jennifer S. Beaudin

  • Activity Recognition Using a Single Accelerometer Placed at the Wrist or Ankle

    Andrea Mannini;Stephen S. Intille;Mary Rosenberger;Angelo M. Sabatini

  • Real-time closed-world tracking

    S.S. Intille;J.W. Davis;A.F. Bobick

  • Disparity-Space Images and Large Occlusion Stereo

    Stephen S. Intille;Aaron F. Bobick

  • A living laboratory for the design and evaluation of ubiquitous computing technologies

    Stephen S. Intille;Kent Larson;J. S. Beaudin;J. Nawyn

  • A framework for recognizing multi-agent action from visual evidence

    Stephen S. Intille;Aaron F. Bobick

  • Recognizing Planned, Multiperson Action

    Stephen S. Intille;Aaron F. Bobick

  • A context-aware experience sampling tool

    Stephen S. Intille;John Rondoni;Charles Kukla;Isabel Ancona

  • A new research challenge: persuasive technology to motivate healthy aging

    S.S. Intille

  • Adding GPS-Control to Traditional Thermostats: An Exploration of Potential Energy Savings and Design Challenges

    Manu Gupta;Stephen S. Intille;Kent Larson

  • Tools for Studying Behavior and Technology in Natural Settings

    Stephen S. Intille;Emmanuel Munguia Tapia;John Rondoni;Jennifer Beaudin

  • A Perceptually-Based Interactive and Immersive Story Environment

    Aaron F. Bobick;Stephen S. Intille;James W. Davis;Freedom Baird

Frequent Co-Authors

Genevieve F. Dunton
Genevieve F. Dunton University of Southern California
Aaron F. Bobick
Aaron F. Bobick Washington University in St. Louis
William L. Haskell
William L. Haskell Stanford University
Corrine I. Voils
Corrine I. Voils University of Wisconsin–Madison
Mary Ann Pentz
Mary Ann Pentz University of Southern California
Laura P. Svetkey
Laura P. Svetkey Duke University
Matthew S. Goodwin
Matthew S. Goodwin Northeastern University
James W. Davis
James W. Davis The Ohio State University
Hayden B. Bosworth
Hayden B. Bosworth Duke University
Jennifer Wolch
Jennifer Wolch University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring additional online degrees can help you tailor your Computer Science education to fit your goals. Many students start by looking for affordable master degree online options. These programs provide advanced skills without the financial burden of traditional on-campus degrees.

For those interested in leadership and management roles within tech or higher education, you might consider a doctorate in leadership or review online educational leadership programs to advance in academia or organizational settings.

If you prefer a faster route into the workforce, you may want to see what's the easiest associate's degree to get. These programs can put you on the path to entry-level IT support or software roles in less time.

Whether you are considering a master’s, doctorate, or associate’s degree, online programs offer flexibility, affordability, and career advancement for aspiring computer science professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen S. Intille

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles