World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
63
Citations
22983
World Ranking
2693
National Ranking
1336

Aaron F. Bobick publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aaron F. Bobick sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 169 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Aaron F. Bobick D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aaron F. Bobick sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to activity recognition in computer vision
  • 2011 - ACM Distinguished Member

Overview

Aaron F. Bobick is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily within computer science, neuroscience, and psychology.

Their recent publications highlight contributions in areas such as human activity comprehension, human-robot interaction, and event cognition. Notable papers include:

  • "The multi-angle extended three-dimensional activities (META) stimulus set: A tool for studying event cognition," 2022, published in Behavior Research Methods
  • "Modeling human activity comprehension at human scale: Prediction, segmentation, and categorization," 2024, published in PNAS Nexus
  • "Toward Safe and Efficient Human-Robot Interaction via Behavior-Driven Danger Signaling," 2023, published in IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology
  • "Robot Action Planning in the Presence of Careless Humans," 2024, published in IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems
  • "Toward Safe and Efficient Human-Robot Interaction via Behavior-Driven Danger Signaling," 2021, published on arXiv (Cornell University)

The range of publication venues where they often contribute includes:

  • PNAS Nexus
  • Behavior Research Methods
  • IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology
  • IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Aaron F. Bobick has collaborated frequently with several co-authors such as Mehdi Hosseinzadeh, Bruno Sinopoli, Matthew A. Bezdek, Todd S. Braver, and Jeffrey M. Zacks. These collaborations have often resulted in multiple joint publications.

Their work covers several subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, computer vision and pattern recognition, statistics, probability and uncertainty, and artificial intelligence.

Research topics addressed in their publications encompass neural and behavioral psychology studies, action observation and synchronization, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, risk and safety analysis, generative adversarial networks and image synthesis, and computer graphics and visualization techniques.

Aaron F. Bobick has received awards such as the IEEE Fellow distinction in 2015 for contributions to activity recognition in computer vision, as well as being named an ACM Distinguished Member in 2011.

Best Publications

  • The recognition of human movement using temporal templates

    A.F. Bobick;J.W. Davis

  • Graphcut textures: image and video synthesis using graph cuts

    Vivek Kwatra;Arno Schödl;Irfan Essa;Greg Turk

  • The representation and recognition of human movement using temporal templates

    J.W. Davis;A.F. Bobick

  • Recognition of visual activities and interactions by stochastic parsing

    Y.A. Ivanov;A.F. Bobick

  • Texture optimization for example-based synthesis

    Vivek Kwatra;Irfan Essa;Aaron Bobick;Nipun Kwatra

  • Parametric hidden Markov models for gesture recognition

    A.D. Wilson;A.F. Bobick

  • Interactive exercise apparatus

    W. Thatcher Ulrich;Harvey A. Koselka;Aaron F. Bobick;Michael H. Benjamin

  • Large Occlusion Stereo

    Aaron F. Bobick;Stephen S. Intille

  • The KidsRoom: A Perceptually-Based Interactive and Immersive Story Environment

    Aaron F. Bobick;Stephen S. Intille;James W. Davis;Freedom Baird

  • Gait recognition using static, activity-specific parameters

    A.F. Bobick;A.Y. Johnson

  • Recognition of human body motion using phase space constraints

    L.W. Campbell;A.F. Bobick

  • Movement, activity and action: the role of knowledge in the perception of motion

    Aaron F. Bobick

  • A state-based approach to the representation and recognition of gesture

    A.F. Bobick;A.D. Wilson

  • Real-time closed-world tracking

    S.S. Intille;J.W. Davis;A.F. Bobick

  • Invariant features for 3-D gesture recognition

    L.W. Campbell;D.A. Becker;A. Azarbayejani;A.F. Bobick

  • Fast Lighting Independent Background Subtraction

    Yuri Ivanov;Aaron Bobick;John Liu

  • Real-time recognition of activity using temporal templates

    A. Bobick;J. Davis

  • Disparity-Space Images and Large Occlusion Stereo

    Stephen S. Intille;Aaron F. Bobick

  • Gait recognition from time-normalized joint-angle trajectories in the walking plane

    R. Tanawongsuwan;A. Bobick

  • A Multi-view Method for Gait Recognition Using Static Body Parameters

    Amos Y. Johnson;Aaron F. Bobick

  • On Human Action

    Aaron F. Bobick;Volker Krüger

  • A Perceptually-Based Interactive and Immersive Story Environment

    Aaron F. Bobick;Stephen S. Intille;James W. Davis;Freedom Baird

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew D. Wilson
Andrew D. Wilson Microsoft (United States)
James W. Davis
James W. Davis The Ohio State University
Stephen S. Intille
Stephen S. Intille Northeastern University
Irfan Essa
Irfan Essa Georgia Institute of Technology
James M. Rehg
James M. Rehg University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Allen Tannenbaum
Allen Tannenbaum Stony Brook University
Andrea L. Thomaz
Andrea L. Thomaz The University of Texas at Austin
Magnus Egerstedt
Magnus Egerstedt University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Gregory D. Abowd
Gregory D. Abowd Northeastern University
Elizabeth D. Mynatt
Elizabeth D. Mynatt Northeastern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a range of flexible online degrees and specialized career paths. Choosing the right program depends on your background, career goals, and budget.

As technology evolves, degrees in computer science and related fields continue to rank among the best majors for the future. These majors offer strong job prospects and are highly valued in today's job market.

For those seeking swift advancement, there are easy masters degrees online that let you upskill with greater flexibility. Choosing an accelerated program can help working professionals pivot careers without a lengthy commitment.

If you’re interested in research or academia, you can consider cheap phd programs online that make pursuing a doctoral degree more accessible than ever. Similarly, education leaders may appreciate the variety of cheapest edd programs online designed for fast-tracked completion and affordability.

Whether you’re just starting or seeking advanced credentials, these pathways provide quality, convenience, and value—helping you shape a future-ready career in computer science.

Best Scientists Citing Aaron F. Bobick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles