World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
87
Citations
33815
World Ranking
717
National Ranking
378

Jake K. Aggarwal publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jake K. Aggarwal sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 474 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jake K. Aggarwal D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jake K. Aggarwal sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2005 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2004 - IAPR King-Sun Fu Prize
  • 1998 - Fellow of the International Association for Pattern Recognition (IAPR) For contributions to computer vision and outstanding leadership of IAPR
  • 1976 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to time delay systems and digital filters.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Computer vision
  • Statistics

Jake K. Aggarwal focuses on Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Image processing, Pattern recognition and Motion estimation. His research in Feature extraction, Segmentation, Motion, Image segmentation and Pattern recognition are components of Artificial intelligence. His study in Motion analysis, Structure from motion, Tracking, Feature and Object falls under the purview of Computer vision.

He has included themes like Expected value, Surface, Stereoscopy and Computation in his Image processing study. His work carried out in the field of Pattern recognition brings together such families of science as Histogram and Feature. His work deals with themes such as Motion compensation and Match moving, which intersect with Motion estimation.

His most cited work include:

  • Human motion analysis: a review (1635 citations)
  • Human activity analysis: A review (1634 citations)
  • View invariant human action recognition using histograms of 3D joints (1023 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Jake K. Aggarwal mainly investigates Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Pattern recognition, Image processing and Segmentation. His work in Motion estimation, Object, Feature extraction, Image segmentation and Cognitive neuroscience of visual object recognition are all subfields of Artificial intelligence research. His research integrates issues of Motion analysis and Match moving in his study of Motion estimation.

The study of Computer vision is intertwined with the study of Pattern recognition in a number of ways. His Pattern recognition research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Histogram, Feature, Facial recognition system and Three-dimensional face recognition. Jake K. Aggarwal regularly ties together related areas like Range in his Segmentation studies.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Artificial intelligence (74.02%)
  • Computer vision (60.29%)
  • Pattern recognition (17.40%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2005-2020)?

  • Artificial intelligence (74.02%)
  • Computer vision (60.29%)
  • Pattern recognition (17.40%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His scientific interests lie mostly in Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Pattern recognition, Activity recognition and Feature extraction. His Artificial intelligence study typically links adjacent topics like Machine learning. Video tracking, Object detection, Segmentation, Tracking and Optical flow are subfields of Computer vision in which his conducts study.

His Pattern recognition research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Cognitive neuroscience of visual object recognition, 3D single-object recognition, Feature and Three-dimensional face recognition. The Activity recognition study combines topics in areas such as Image processing, Robot, Type and Data mining. While the research belongs to areas of Structure from motion, Jake K. Aggarwal spends his time largely on the problem of Motion detection, intersecting his research to questions surrounding Motion estimation.

Between 2005 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Human activity analysis: A review (1634 citations)
  • View invariant human action recognition using histograms of 3D joints (1023 citations)
  • Spatio-temporal relationship match: Video structure comparison for recognition of complex human activities (477 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Computer vision
  • Machine learning

Jake K. Aggarwal mostly deals with Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Pattern recognition, Feature extraction and Activity recognition. The various areas that Jake K. Aggarwal examines in his Artificial intelligence study include Machine learning and Group. Jake K. Aggarwal performs integrative study on Computer vision and Scale in his works.

The concepts of his Pattern recognition study are interwoven with issues in Facial recognition system, Cognitive neuroscience of visual object recognition and Facial expression. He studied Feature extraction and Histogram that intersect with Invariant and Spherical coordinate system. His studies deal with areas such as Feature and Data mining as well as Activity recognition.

Best Publications

  • Human activity analysis: A review

    J.K. Aggarwal;M.S. Ryoo

  • Human motion analysis: a review

    J.K. Aggarwal;Q. Cai

  • View invariant human action recognition using histograms of 3D joints

    Lu Xia;Chia-Chih Chen;J. K. Aggarwal

  • Structure from stereo-a review

    U.R. Dhond;J.K. Aggarwal

  • Human Motion Analysis

    J.K. Aggarwal;Q. Cai

  • On the computation of motion from sequences of images-A review

    J.K. Aggarwal;N. Nandhakumar

  • A large-scale benchmark dataset for event recognition in surveillance video

    Sangmin Oh;Anthony Hoogs;Amitha Perera;Naresh Cuntoor

  • Spatio-temporal relationship match: Video structure comparison for recognition of complex human activities

    M. S. Ryoo;J. K. Aggarwal

  • Human detection using depth information by Kinect

    Lu Xia;Chia-Chih Chen;J. K. Aggarwal

  • Volumetric Descriptions of Objects from Multiple Views

    Worthy N. Martin;J. K. Aggarwal

  • Human activity recognition from 3D data: A review

    Jake K. Aggarwal;Lu Xia

  • Spatio-temporal Depth Cuboid Similarity Feature for Activity Recognition Using Depth Camera

    Lu Xia;J. K. Aggarwal

  • Texture Analysis Using Generalized Co-Occurrence Matrices

    Larry S. Davis;Steven A. Johns;J. K. Aggarwal

  • Tracking human motion in structured environments using a distributed-camera system

    Q. Cai;J.K. Aggarwal

  • Recognition of Composite Human Activities through Context-Free Grammar Based Representation

    M.S. Ryoo;J.K. Aggarwal

  • Model-based object recognition in dense-range images—a review

    Farshid Arman;J. K. Aggarwal

  • A hierarchical Bayesian network for event recognition of human actions and interactions

    Sangho Park;J. K. Aggarwal

  • Image sequence analysis

    Thomas S. Huang;J. K. Aggarwal

  • Structure from motion of rigid and jointed objects

    Jon A. Webb;J. K. Aggarwal

  • Tracking human motion using multiple cameras

    Q. Cai;J.K. Aggarwal

  • Matching Three-Dimensional Objects Using Silhouettes

    Y. F. Wang;M. J. Magee;J. K. Aggarwal

  • AVSS 2011 demo session: A large-scale benchmark dataset for event recognition in surveillance video

    Sangmin Oh;Anthony Hoogs;Amitha Perera;Naresh Cuntoor

Frequent Co-Authors

Amar Mitiche
Amar Mitiche Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Michael S. Ryoo
Michael S. Ryoo Stony Brook University
Alan C. Bovik
Alan C. Bovik The University of Texas at Austin
Larry S. Davis
Larry S. Davis University of Maryland, College Park
Vipin Chaudhary
Vipin Chaudhary University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Baba C. Vemuri
Baba C. Vemuri University of Florida
Yuan-Fang Wang
Yuan-Fang Wang University of California, Santa Barbara
Larry Matthies
Larry Matthies Jet Propulsion Lab
Amit K. Roy-Chowdhury
Amit K. Roy-Chowdhury University of California, Riverside
Rita Cucchiara
Rita Cucchiara University of Modena and Reggio Emilia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Advancing in computer science doesn’t always require a traditional campus experience. Today, many students are considering alternative online education paths to suit their career goals, timeframe, and budget.

For those seeking fast entry into the workforce, an accelerated associate degree in tech can provide core knowledge in as little as six months. Meanwhile, business-minded individuals often explore online business schools to combine computer science skills with management and entrepreneurship expertise.

Graduate options are expanding as well. Ambitious educators or researchers may benefit from accelerated doctoral programs in education online, making it possible to complete a terminal degree more quickly. For those on a limited budget, it’s worth considering cheap doctoral programs that deliver quality education at a lower cost.

Exploring these online degree options can help you tailor your computer science education around your professional ambitions and personal needs while saving time and money.

Best Scientists Citing Jake K. Aggarwal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles