World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025
Award Badge
Business and Management
Saudi Arabia
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Rising Stars 35 852 849 47 47 106 3814
Business and Management 44 1367 1280 2 2 99 5713
Economics and Finance 42 2099 1898 5 5 99 5334

Ahmed A. Elamer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ahmed A. Elamer between 2015 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ahmed A. Elamer published across 11 years, from 2015 to 2025, averaging 12.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2024. 49 of the 137 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2015 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2024. 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication 2018: 5 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 26 publications 2025: 23 publications
2015 2025

137 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ahmed A. Elamer: publications per year, 2015 to 2025
Year Publications
2015 1
2016 1
2017 1
2018 5
2019 12
2020 19
2021 22
2022 12
2023 15
2024 26
2025 23
Total 137
Download as CSV

Ahmed A. Elamer publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ahmed A. Elamer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 95–99 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 99 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122 99
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Ahmed A. Elamer D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ahmed A. Elamer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68 44
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Business and Management in Saudi Arabia Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Ahmed A. Elamer is affiliated with Brunel University London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans broadly within the field of Business, Management and Accounting, with a more concentrated focus on subfields such as Accounting, Strategy and Management, Economics and Econometrics, Marketing, and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management.

The scholar's work predominantly addresses topics including Corporate Finance and Governance, Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance, Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting, Environmental Sustainability in Business, Energy, Environment, Economic Growth, Gender Diversity and Inequality, and Family Business Performance and Succession.

Frequent venues for publication include the SSRN Electronic Journal, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Business Strategy and the Environment, International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, and Journal of Financial Reporting & Accounting.

The researcher's recent papers reflect an emphasis on governance, environmental, social, and corporate sustainability issues. Selected publications are:

  • "Nudging toward diversity in the boardroom: A systematic literature review of board diversity of financial institutions" (2020), Business Strategy and the Environment
  • "Environmental, social and governance ratings and firm performance: The moderating role of internal control quality" (2022), Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
  • "ESG controversies and corporate performance: The moderating effect of governance mechanisms and ESG practices" (2024), Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
  • "A bibliometric analysis of cash holdings literature: current status, development, and agenda for future research" (2021), Management Review Quarterly
  • "Female Audit Partners and Extended Audit Reporting: UK Evidence" (2020), Journal of Business Ethics

Ahmed A. Elamer collaborates recurrently with multiple co-authors, notably including Hussein A. Abdou, Abeer Hassan, Saleh F. A. Khatib, Bassam A. Ibrahim, and Andrews Owusu.

Best Publications

  • A study of environmental policies and regulations, governance structures, and environmental performance: The role of female directors

    Mohamed H. Elmagrhi;Mohamed H. Elmagrhi;Collins G. Ntim;Ahmed A. Elamer;Ahmed A. Elamer;Qingjing Zhang

  • Nudging toward diversity in the boardroom: A systematic literature review of board diversity of financial institutions

    Saleh F. A. Khatib;Dewi Fariha Abdullah;Ahmed A. Elamer;Ahmed A. Elamer;Raed Abueid

  • Islamic governance, national governance, and bank risk management and disclosure in MENA countries

    Ahmed A. Elamer;Ahmed A. Elamer;Collins G. Ntim;Hussein A. Abdou;Hussein A. Abdou

  • Corporate Boards, Ownership Structures and Corporate Disclosures: Evidence from a Developing Country

    Abdalrhman Alnabsha;Hussein A Abdou;Collins Gyakari Ntim;Ahmed Ahmed Elamer

  • ESG controversies and corporate performance: The moderating effect of governance mechanisms and ESG practices

    Unknown

  • Ownership types, corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures: Empirical evidence from a developing country

    Ibrahem Alshbili;Ahmed A. Elamer;Eshani Beddewela

  • Biodiversity and extinction accounting for sustainable development: A systematic literature review and future research directions

    Lee Roberts;Abeer Hassan;Ahmed Elamer;Monomita Nandy

  • A bibliometric analysis of cash holdings literature: current status, development, and agenda for future research

    Saleh F. A. Khatib;Dewi Fariha Abdullah;Ernie Hendrawaty;Ahmed A. Elamer;Ahmed A. Elamer

  • The impact of multi-layer governance on bank risk disclosure in emerging markets: the case of Middle East and North Africa

    Ahmed A. Elamer;Collins G. Ntim;Hussein A. Abdou;Alaa Mansour Zalata

  • Board gender diversity and ESG performance: The mediating role of temporal orientation in South Africa context

    Unknown

  • Global trends in board diversity research: a bibliometric view

    Saleh F.A. Khatib;Dewi Fariha Abdullah;Ahmed Elamer;Ibrahim Suleiman Yahaya

  • Female Audit Partners and Extended Audit Reporting: UK Evidence

    Tarek Abdelfattah;Mohamed Elmahgoub;Mohamed Elmahgoub;Ahmed A. Elamer;Ahmed A. Elamer

  • Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and corporate environmental sustainability: A systematic literature review and avenues for future research

    Unknown

  • Sharia supervisory boards, governance structures and operational risk disclosures: Evidence from Islamic banks in MENA countries

    Ahmed A. Elamer;Ahmed A. Elamer;Collins G. Ntim;Hussein A. Abdou;Hussein A. Abdou;Chris Pyke

  • Environmental performance and corporate innovation in China: The moderating impact of firm ownership

    Unknown

  • A systematic literature review on risk disclosure research: State-of-the-art and future research agenda

    Unknown

  • Voluntary assurance of sustainability reporting: evidence from an emerging economy

    Abeer Hassan;Ahmed A. Elamer;Ahmed A. Elamer;Nawreen Sobhan;Mary Fletcher

  • Integrated reporting in UK higher education institutions

    M. Adhikariparajul;A. Hassan;M. Fletcher;Ahmed A. Elamer;Ahmed A. Elamer

  • The future of non-financial businesses reporting: Learning from the Covid-19 pandemic

    Abeer Hassan;Ahmed A. Elamer;Suman Lodh;Lee Roberts

  • Sustainability assurance practices: a systematic review and future research agenda

    Saddam A. Hazaea;Jinyu Zhu;Saleh F. A. Khatib;Ayman Hassan Bazhair

  • The corporate governance–risk-taking nexus: evidence from insurance companies

    Ahmed A. Elamer;Aws AlHares;Collins G. Ntim;Ismail Benyazid

  • Corporate Governance and Earnings Management Nexus: Evidence from the UK and Egypt Using Neural Networks

    Hussein A. Abdou;Hussein A. Abdou;Nouran N. Ellelly;Ahmed A. Elamer;Ahmed A. Elamer;Khaled Hussainey

  • Gender diversity, corporate governance and financial risk disclosure in the UK

    Idris M. Bufarwa;Ahmed A. Elamer;Collins G. Ntim;Aws AlHares

Frequent Co-Authors

Collins G. Ntim
Collins G. Ntim University of Southampton
Khaled Hussainey
Khaled Hussainey Bangor University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring business and management studies opens up a wide range of online degree options and unique career directions. Many students are choosing flexible education paths, including a focus on in-demand fields like construction project management degree online programs. These degrees allow you to gain leadership, planning, and organizational skills tailored for the construction industry.

Healthcare is another fast-growing sector, and students are increasingly enrolling in online healthcare administration programs to prepare for management roles in hospitals, clinics, and other medical settings. Choosing a fast track school programs option can help accelerate your graduation and offer a quicker route to the workforce—ideal for motivated learners looking to start their careers sooner.

If you’re looking to maximize value, earning an online degree in business can be both affordable and flexible. With so many online pathways available, students can tailor their education to their interests, schedule, and career goals—while keeping costs and timelines in check.

Best Scientists Citing Ahmed A. Elamer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles