What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
Snorre Stuen mainly investigates Virology, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Ehrlichia, Ixodes ricinus and Flock.
His Virology study frequently draws parallels with other fields, such as Polymerase chain reaction.
His Anaplasma phagocytophilum study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Tick, Phylogenetics, Gene and Microbiology.
The concepts of his Tick study are interwoven with issues in Zoology, Ehrlichiosis, Transmission, Host and Infectious dose.
His Ehrlichia research includes elements of Antibody response and Pasture.
As a part of the same scientific family, Snorre Stuen mostly works in the field of Flock, focusing on Serology and, on occasion, Monoclonal antibody, Antigen and Recombinant DNA.
His most cited work include:
- Anaplasma phagocytophilum—a widespread multi-host pathogen with highly adaptive strategies (288 citations)
- Sequence Analysis of the msp4 Gene of Anaplasma phagocytophilum Strains (171 citations)
- Distinct Host Species Correlate with Anaplasma phagocytophilum ankA Gene Clusters (112 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Virology, Ixodes ricinus, Veterinary medicine and Tick are his primary areas of study.
His Anaplasma phagocytophilum research incorporates themes from Anaplasmosis, Ixodes, Microbiology and Anaplasma.
His Ehrlichia, Ehrlichiosis, Rickettsia and Tick infestation study in the realm of Virology interacts with subjects such as Persistence.
His Ixodes ricinus research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Borrelia, Borrelia burgdorferi and Polymerase chain reaction.
His study in the field of Flock is also linked to topics like Norwegian.
His study looks at the intersection of Tick and topics like Pathogen with Transmission, Host and Subclinical infection.
He most often published in these fields:
- Anaplasma phagocytophilum (47.00%)
- Virology (41.00%)
- Ixodes ricinus (36.00%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?
- Ixodes ricinus (36.00%)
- Tick (25.00%)
- Zoology (13.00%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Snorre Stuen mostly deals with Ixodes ricinus, Tick, Zoology, Nymph and Anaplasma phagocytophilum.
His research on Ixodes ricinus concerns the broader Veterinary medicine.
His study in Tick is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Serology, Seroprevalence, Roe deer and Sentinel species.
His work carried out in the field of Zoology brings together such families of science as Range, Pathogen, Rickettsia helvetica, Ehrlichia and Anaplasma.
The various areas that he examines in his Nymph study include Abundance and Transect.
His Anaplasma phagocytophilum research incorporates elements of Viremia, Titer, Encephalitis Viruses, Microbiology and Vaccination.
Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Tick‐borne encephalitis virus in cows and unpasteurized cow milk from Norway (17 citations)
- The distribution limit of the common tick, Ixodes ricinus, and some associated pathogens in north-western Europe (13 citations)
- Predicting and mapping human risk of exposure to ixodes ricinus nymphs using climatic and environmental data, Denmark, Norway and Sweden, 2016 (13 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
His main research concerns Ixodes ricinus, Tick, Range, Zoology and Tick-borne disease.
His Ixodes ricinus research integrates issues from Tick-borne encephalitis virus, Real-time polymerase chain reaction and Accession number.
His research investigates the connection between Tick and topics such as Nymph that intersect with issues in Transect.
The Range study combines topics in areas such as Entomology, Rickettsia helvetica, Borrelia and Growing season.
His Zoology study incorporates themes from Babesia canis and Taiga.
Snorre Stuen combines subjects such as Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis, Genetics and Plasmid with his study of Tick-borne disease.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
