World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
49
Citations
7231
World Ranking
6053
National Ranking
2643

Gaylord Ellison publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gaylord Ellison sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 117 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Gaylord Ellison D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gaylord Ellison sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gaylord Ellison was affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Throughout their academic career, they contributed to the scientific community without recorded co-authors or frequent publication venues, indicating a focus on solitary research or a limited available record of collaborations and venues.

There were no recent papers listed, including titles, years of publication, or publication venues, which suggests either an absence of recent publications or a lack of comprehensive publicly available data on their output.

The scientist did not have recorded main fields of study, subfields, or main topics of work associated with their research. This absence of detailed disciplinary information limits a specific characterization of their academic focus areas.

No book publications or associated publishers were documented, indicating that Gaylord Ellison may have concentrated on journal articles or other types of scholarly contributions.

There is no information regarding awards or distinctions received throughout their career, which implies either a lack of formal recognitions in the available records or that such data was not archived.

Gaylord Ellison was deceased, and this profile reflects the entirety of the known information about their academic footprint. The absence of many data points might reflect archival gaps or the nature of their professional activities not being extensively documented in accessible databases.

Best Publications

  • Mice lacking the beta3 subunit of the GABAA receptor have the epilepsy phenotype and many of the behavioral characteristics of Angelman syndrome.

    T. M. DeLorey;A. Handforth;S. G. Anagnostaras;G. E. Homanics

  • Long-term changes in dopaminergic innervation of caudate nucleus after continuous amphetamine administration

    Gaylord Ellison;Michael S. Eison;Harris S. Huberman;Frank Daniel

  • The N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonists phencyclidine, ketamine and dizocilpine as both behavioral and anatomical models of the dementias

    Gaylord Ellison

  • Multiple neurological abnormalities in mice deficient in the G protein Go

    Meisheng Jiang;Michael S. Gold;Guylain Boulay;Karsten Spicher

  • Stimulant-induced psychosis, the dopamine theory of schizophrenia, and the habenula

    Gaylord Ellison

  • Chronic nicotine and withdrawal effects on radial-arm maze performance in rats.

    Edward D. Levin;Charles Lee;Jed E. Rose;Antonio Reyes

  • Opposite effects of a D1 and a D2 agonist on oral movements in rats.

    Per Johansson;Edward Levin;Lars Gunne;Gaylord Ellison

  • Ethanol intake increases during continuous administration of amphetamine and nicotine, but not several other drugs.

    Allen D. Potthoff;Gaylord Ellison;Linda Nelson

  • Effects of the nicotinic receptor blocker mecamylamine on radial-arm maze performance in rats.

    Edward D. Levin;Mark Castonguay;Gaylord D. Ellison

  • Continuous amphetamine intoxication: an animal model of the acute psychotic episode.

    Gaylord D. Ellison;Michael S. Eison

  • Enhanced stereotypies after repeated injections but not continuous amphetamines

    Linda R. Nelson;Gaylord Ellison

  • Dissimilar patterns of degeneration in brain following four different addictive stimulants

    Gaylord Ellison;Robert C. Switzer

  • Competitive and non-competitive NMDA antagonists induce similar limbic degeneration.

    Gaylord Ellison

  • Specific appearance of sympathetic cholinergic vasodilatation in muscles during conditioned movements.

    Gaylord D. Ellison;Alberto Zanchetti

  • Chronic nicotine and withdrawal effects on body weight and food and water consumption in female rats.

    Edward D. Levin;Michael M. Morgan;Caroline Galvez;Gaylord D. Ellison

  • Neural degeneration following chronic stimulant abuse reveals a weak link in brain, fasciculus retroflexus, implying the loss of forebrain control circuitry

    Gaylord Ellison

  • Tests of emotional behavior in rats following depletion of norepinephrine, of serotonin, or of both

    Gaylord D. Ellison;David E. Bresler

  • Rats administered chronic neuroleptics develop oral movements which are similar in form to those in humans with tardive dyskinesia.

    Gaylord Ellison;Ronald E. See

  • Continuous cocaine administration produces persisting changes in brain neurochemistry and behavior.

    Steve Zeigler;Jack Lipton;Arthur Toga;Gaylord Ellison

  • Striatal organization of feeding behavior in the decorticate rat

    Charles A. Sorenson;Gaylord D. Ellison

  • Tremorous mouth movements in rats administered chronic neuroleptics.

    G. Ellison;R. See;E. Levin;J. Kinney

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward D. Levin
Edward D. Levin Duke University
Neal R. Swerdlow
Neal R. Swerdlow University of California, San Diego
Mark A. Geyer
Mark A. Geyer University of California, San Diego
Jack W. Lipton
Jack W. Lipton Michigan State University
Charles K. Meshul
Charles K. Meshul Oregon Health & Science University
Michael M. Morgan
Michael M. Morgan Washington State University
Marie-Françoise Chesselet
Marie-Françoise Chesselet University of California, Los Angeles
Richard W. Olsen
Richard W. Olsen University of California, Los Angeles
Allan R. Wagner
Allan R. Wagner Yale University
Shepard Siegel
Shepard Siegel McMaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience opens doors to a variety of related career pathways in healthcare, mental health, and research. Many students interested in the mind and behavior consider flexible online programs to advance their education and expertise.

For those seeking to work in social services or clinical settings, the 1 year online master's in social work offers a fast-track route to professional licensure and practice. Others might opt for a psychology route; programs like the best online psychology degree help graduates build strong foundations in research and mental health support.

Accredited counseling degrees are also in high demand. Consider programs listed among cacrep accredited programs for quality assurance and improved career prospects. Cost is often a concern, so it’s helpful to explore the masters in counseling online cost to find affordable options that fit your budget.

Exploring these related disciplines online can lead to diverse career opportunities, from clinical practice to research and advocacy in neuroscience and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Gaylord Ellison

Recently Published Articles