World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 49 6053 2643 117 7231

Gaylord Ellison publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gaylord Ellison between 1962 and 2018, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gaylord Ellison published across 57 years, from 1962 to 2018, averaging 2.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 1987. 1 of the 117 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1962 to 2018. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 1987. 1962: 1 publication 1963: 0 publications 1964: 2 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 3 publications 1969: 1 publication 1970: 2 publications 1971: 3 publications 1972: 3 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 2 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 3 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 4 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 2 publications 1981: 6 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 7 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 10 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 5 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 4 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 1 publication
1962 2018

117 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gaylord Ellison: publications per year, 1962 to 2018
Year Publications
1962 1
1963 0
1964 2
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 3
1969 1
1970 2
1971 3
1972 3
1973 1
1974 2
1975 3
1976 3
1977 2
1978 4
1979 1
1980 2
1981 6
1982 3
1983 7
1984 1
1985 2
1986 0
1987 10
1988 4
1989 6
1990 6
1991 5
1992 1
1993 2
1994 3
1995 5
1996 3
1997 1
1998 5
1999 5
2000 3
2001 1
2002 4
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 0
2009 0
2010 0
2011 0
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 1
Total 117
Download as CSV

Gaylord Ellison publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gaylord Ellison sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 108–117 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 117 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505 117
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Gaylord Ellison D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gaylord Ellison sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435 49
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Gaylord Ellison was affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Throughout their academic career, they contributed to the scientific community without recorded co-authors or frequent publication venues, indicating a focus on solitary research or a limited available record of collaborations and venues.

There were no recent papers listed, including titles, years of publication, or publication venues, which suggests either an absence of recent publications or a lack of comprehensive publicly available data on their output.

The scientist did not have recorded main fields of study, subfields, or main topics of work associated with their research. This absence of detailed disciplinary information limits a specific characterization of their academic focus areas.

No book publications or associated publishers were documented, indicating that Gaylord Ellison may have concentrated on journal articles or other types of scholarly contributions.

There is no information regarding awards or distinctions received throughout their career, which implies either a lack of formal recognitions in the available records or that such data was not archived.

Gaylord Ellison was deceased, and this profile reflects the entirety of the known information about their academic footprint. The absence of many data points might reflect archival gaps or the nature of their professional activities not being extensively documented in accessible databases.

Best Publications

  • Mice lacking the beta3 subunit of the GABAA receptor have the epilepsy phenotype and many of the behavioral characteristics of Angelman syndrome.

    T. M. DeLorey;A. Handforth;S. G. Anagnostaras;G. E. Homanics

  • Long-term changes in dopaminergic innervation of caudate nucleus after continuous amphetamine administration

    Gaylord Ellison;Michael S. Eison;Harris S. Huberman;Frank Daniel

  • The N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonists phencyclidine, ketamine and dizocilpine as both behavioral and anatomical models of the dementias

    Gaylord Ellison

  • Multiple neurological abnormalities in mice deficient in the G protein Go

    Meisheng Jiang;Michael S. Gold;Guylain Boulay;Karsten Spicher

  • Stimulant-induced psychosis, the dopamine theory of schizophrenia, and the habenula

    Gaylord Ellison

  • Chronic nicotine and withdrawal effects on radial-arm maze performance in rats.

    Edward D. Levin;Charles Lee;Jed E. Rose;Antonio Reyes

  • Opposite effects of a D1 and a D2 agonist on oral movements in rats.

    Per Johansson;Edward Levin;Lars Gunne;Gaylord Ellison

  • Ethanol intake increases during continuous administration of amphetamine and nicotine, but not several other drugs.

    Allen D. Potthoff;Gaylord Ellison;Linda Nelson

  • Effects of the nicotinic receptor blocker mecamylamine on radial-arm maze performance in rats.

    Edward D. Levin;Mark Castonguay;Gaylord D. Ellison

  • Continuous amphetamine intoxication: an animal model of the acute psychotic episode.

    Gaylord D. Ellison;Michael S. Eison

  • Enhanced stereotypies after repeated injections but not continuous amphetamines

    Linda R. Nelson;Gaylord Ellison

  • Dissimilar patterns of degeneration in brain following four different addictive stimulants

    Gaylord Ellison;Robert C. Switzer

  • Competitive and non-competitive NMDA antagonists induce similar limbic degeneration.

    Gaylord Ellison

  • Specific appearance of sympathetic cholinergic vasodilatation in muscles during conditioned movements.

    Gaylord D. Ellison;Alberto Zanchetti

  • Chronic nicotine and withdrawal effects on body weight and food and water consumption in female rats.

    Edward D. Levin;Michael M. Morgan;Caroline Galvez;Gaylord D. Ellison

  • Neural degeneration following chronic stimulant abuse reveals a weak link in brain, fasciculus retroflexus, implying the loss of forebrain control circuitry

    Gaylord Ellison

  • Tests of emotional behavior in rats following depletion of norepinephrine, of serotonin, or of both

    Gaylord D. Ellison;David E. Bresler

  • Rats administered chronic neuroleptics develop oral movements which are similar in form to those in humans with tardive dyskinesia.

    Gaylord Ellison;Ronald E. See

  • Continuous cocaine administration produces persisting changes in brain neurochemistry and behavior.

    Steve Zeigler;Jack Lipton;Arthur Toga;Gaylord Ellison

  • Striatal organization of feeding behavior in the decorticate rat

    Charles A. Sorenson;Gaylord D. Ellison

  • Tremorous mouth movements in rats administered chronic neuroleptics.

    G. Ellison;R. See;E. Levin;J. Kinney

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward D. Levin
Edward D. Levin Duke University
Neal R. Swerdlow
Neal R. Swerdlow University of California, San Diego
Mark A. Geyer
Mark A. Geyer University of California, San Diego
Jack W. Lipton
Jack W. Lipton Michigan State University
Charles K. Meshul
Charles K. Meshul Oregon Health & Science University
Michael M. Morgan
Michael M. Morgan Washington State University
Marie-Françoise Chesselet
Marie-Françoise Chesselet University of California, Los Angeles
Richard W. Olsen
Richard W. Olsen University of California, Los Angeles
Allan R. Wagner
Allan R. Wagner Yale University
Shepard Siegel
Shepard Siegel McMaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience opens doors to a variety of related career pathways in healthcare, mental health, and research. Many students interested in the mind and behavior consider flexible online programs to advance their education and expertise.

For those seeking to work in social services or clinical settings, the 1 year online master's in social work offers a fast-track route to professional licensure and practice. Others might opt for a psychology route; programs like the best online psychology degree help graduates build strong foundations in research and mental health support.

Accredited counseling degrees are also in high demand. Consider programs listed among cacrep accredited programs for quality assurance and improved career prospects. Cost is often a concern, so it’s helpful to explore the masters in counseling online cost to find affordable options that fit your budget.

Exploring these related disciplines online can lead to diverse career opportunities, from clinical practice to research and advocacy in neuroscience and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Gaylord Ellison

Recently Published Articles