World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 42 7311 7027 319 316 124 8751

Lisa Wingate publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lisa Wingate between 2004 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lisa Wingate published across 23 years, from 2004 to 2026, averaging 6.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2021. 11 of the 157 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2021. 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 5 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 10 publications 2026: 1 publication
2004 2026

157 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lisa Wingate: publications per year, 2004 to 2026
Year Publications
2004 2
2005 2
2006 4
2007 6
2008 3
2009 7
2010 2
2011 6
2012 4
2013 1
2014 5
2015 8
2016 9
2017 6
2018 13
2019 11
2020 13
2021 15
2022 11
2023 6
2024 12
2025 10
2026 1
Total 157
Download as CSV

Lisa Wingate publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa Wingate sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 124 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617 124
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Lisa Wingate D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa Wingate sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305 42
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Lisa Wingate is affiliated with INRAE, the Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement in France. Their research spans several fields within environmental and biological sciences, focusing primarily on plant water relations, carbon dynamics, and climate interactions.

The main fields of study for their work include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Within these domains, their work concentrates on specific subfields such as:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Ecology
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Plant Science
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Key research topics addressed by Wingate encompass:

  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Tree-ring Climate Responses
  • Remote Sensing in Agriculture
  • Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change

Wingate has contributed multiple papers to notable publication venues, including:

  • New Phytologist
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Annals of Forest Science
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Functional Ecology

Selected recent publications are:

  • An explanation for the isotopic offset between soil and stem water in a temperate tree species, 2020, New Phytologist
  • Soil enzymes in response to climate warming: Mechanisms and feedbacks, 2022, Functional Ecology
  • Evidence for distinct isotopic compositions of sap and tissue water in tree stems: consequences for plant water source identification, 2021, New Phytologist
  • Do 2H and 18O in leaf water reflect environmental drivers differently?, 2022, New Phytologist
  • A new generation of sensors and monitoring tools to support climate-smart forestry practices, 2021, Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Jérôme Ogée
  • Adrià Barbeta
  • Teresa E. Gimeno
  • Nicolas Devert
  • Régis Burlett

Best Publications

  • Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance

    Belinda E. Medlyn;Remko A. Duursma;Derek Eamus;David S. Ellsworth

  • CO2 balance of boreal, temperate, and tropical forests derived from a global database

    Sebastiaan Luyssaert;Sebastiaan Luyssaert;I. Inglima;M. Jung;A. D. Richardson

  • Drying and wetting of Mediterranean soils stimulates decomposition and carbon dioxide emission: the "Birch effect".

    Paul Jarvis;Ana Rey;Charalampos Petsikos;Lisa Wingate

  • Optimal stomatal behaviour around the world

    Yan Shih Lin;Belinda E. Medlyn;Remko A. Duursma;I. Colin Prentice;I. Colin Prentice

  • How do leaf and ecosystem measures of water-use efficiency compare?

    Belinda E. Medlyn;Martin G. De Kauwe;Yan Shih Lin;Yan Shih Lin;Jurgen Knauer;Jurgen Knauer

  • Phenopix: A R package for image-based vegetation phenology

    Gianluca Filippa;Edoardo Cremonese;Mirco Migliavacca;Marta Galvagno

  • Progress and challenges in using stable isotopes to trace plant carbon and water relations across scales

    Christiane Werner;Hans Schnyder;Matthias Cuntz;C. Keitel

  • Reviews and syntheses: Carbonyl sulfide as a multi-scale tracer for carbon and water cycles

    Mary E. Whelan;Mary E. Whelan;Sinikka T. Lennartz;Teresa E. Gimeno;Richard Wehr

  • Unexplained hydrogen isotope offsets complicate the identification and quantification of tree water sources in a riparian forest

    Adrià Barbeta;Sam P. Jones;Laura Clavé;Lisa Wingate

  • Global transpiration data from sap flow measurements: the SAPFLUXNET database

    Rafael Poyatos;Víctor Granda;Víctor Flo;Mark A. Adams;Mark A. Adams

  • Photosynthetic carbon isotope discrimination and its relationship to the carbon isotope signals of stem, soil and ecosystem respiration

    Lisa Wingate;Lisa Wingate;Lisa Wingate;Jérôme Ogée;Régis Burlett;Alexandre Bosc

  • Variations in 13C discrimination during CO2 exchange by Picea sitchensis branches in the field

    Lisa Wingate;Ulli Seibt;John B. Moncrieff;Paul G. Jarvis

  • Interpreting canopy development and physiology using a European phenology camera network at flux sites

    L. Wingate;J. Ogée;E. Cremonese;G. Filippa

  • An explanation for the isotopic offset between soil and stem water in a temperate tree species.

    Adrià Barbeta;Adrià Barbeta;Teresa E. Gimeno;Teresa E. Gimeno;Laura Clavé;Bastien Fréjaville

  • A dynamic leaf gas-exchange strategy is conserved in woody plants under changing ambient CO2 : evidence from carbon isotope discrimination in paleo and CO2 enrichment studies

    Steven L. Voelker;J. Renée Brooks;Frederick C. Meinzer;Rebecca D. Anderson

  • Evidence for distinct isotopic compositions of sap and tissue water in tree stems: consequences for plant water source identification

    Adrià Barbeta;Adrià Barbeta;Régis Burlett;Paula Martín-Gómez;Bastien Fréjaville

  • A single-substrate model to interpret intra-annual stable isotope signals in tree-ring cellulose.

    Jérôme Ogée;Margaret M Barbour;Lisa Wingate;Lisa Wingate;D Bert

  • The impact of soil microorganisms on the global budget of δ18O in atmospheric CO2

    Lisa Wingate;Jérôme Ogée;Matthias Cuntz;Bernard Genty

  • Carbon balance of coniferous forests growing in contrasting climates: model-based analysis

    Belinda E. Medlyn;Paul Berbigier;Robert Clement;Achim Grelle

  • Interpreting canopy development and physiology using the EUROPhen camera network at flux sites

    Lisa Wingate;Jerome Ogée;Edoardo Cremonese;Gianluca Filippa

  • Towards long-term standardised carbon and greenhouse gas observations for monitoring Europe's terrestrial ecosystems: a review

    Daniela Franz;Manuel Acosta;Núria Altimir;Nicola Arriga

  • Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Jérôme Ogée
Jérôme Ogée INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Régis Burlett
Régis Burlett University of Bordeaux
Teresa E. Gimeno
Teresa E. Gimeno Basque Centre for Climate Change
John Grace
John Grace University of Edinburgh
Dan Yakir
Dan Yakir Weizmann Institute of Science
Mirco Migliavacca
Mirco Migliavacca Joint Research Centre
Maurizio Mencuccini
Maurizio Mencuccini Centre for Research on Ecology and Forestry Applications
Belinda E. Medlyn
Belinda E. Medlyn Western Sydney University
Margaret M. Barbour
Margaret M. Barbour University of Sydney
Alexander Knohl
Alexander Knohl University of Göttingen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many professionals complement their technical knowledge with advanced degrees in education and social work to broaden their impact.

One option is pursuing education doctoral programs without dissertation, which offer a streamlined path for educators focusing on environmental education. These programs emphasize practical leadership skills over traditional research.

For those already holding a master's, an online eds to edd bridge program can be a convenient, flexible way to advance without pausing your career. These bridges often cater to educators involved in sustainability and environmental policy.

Additionally, the cheapest dsw program offers an affordable route into social work at a doctoral level, ideal for students aiming to support communities affected by environmental issues.

For foundational studies, a cheap online general studies degree provides flexibility and affordability, helping learners build diverse skills applicable to various environment-related roles.

Best Scientists Citing Lisa Wingate

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles