World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 39 5695 5289 2697 2458 150 6110

Susan Dorr Goold publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Susan Dorr Goold between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Susan Dorr Goold published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2020. 9 of the 181 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2020. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 5 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 5 publications
1989 2025

181 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Susan Dorr Goold: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 0
1991 1
1992 0
1993 2
1994 1
1995 0
1996 2
1997 3
1998 7
1999 5
2000 6
2001 2
2002 7
2003 2
2004 4
2005 2
2006 7
2007 6
2008 7
2009 8
2010 2
2011 10
2012 5
2013 5
2014 8
2015 1
2016 5
2017 4
2018 12
2019 9
2020 14
2021 9
2022 10
2023 5
2024 4
2025 5
Total 181
Download as CSV

Susan Dorr Goold publications per year - data summary

  • Susan Dorr Goold, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Michigan–Ann Arbor, has 181 publications recorded across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1989 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2020, with 14 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1989, 1991, 1994 and 2015, with 1 publication each.
  • 3 of the 37 years in the span carry no publications at all (1990, 1992 and 1995).
  • The rate of publication averages 4.9 papers per year over the whole span, or 5.3 per year counting only the 34 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 33 publications, 18% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1989-2001: 30 publications (2.3 per year); 2002-2014: 73 publications (5.6 per year); 2015-2025: 78 publications (7.1 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Susan Dorr Goold publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan Dorr Goold sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 144–153 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 150 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407 150
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Susan Dorr Goold publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Susan Dorr Goold, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Michigan–Ann Arbor, records 150 publications - the 41st percentile of the discipline.
  • 41% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Susan Dorr Goold, and about 59% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Susan Dorr Goold ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Susan Dorr Goold D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan Dorr Goold sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300 39
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Susan Dorr Goold D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Susan Dorr Goold, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Michigan–Ann Arbor, records 39 D-Index - the 30th percentile of the discipline.
  • 30% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Susan Dorr Goold, and about 70% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Susan Dorr Goold ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Susan Dorr Goold is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas, primarily focusing on health professions and economics, econometrics, and finance.

Their recent papers include:

  • Financial Toxicity During Breast Cancer Treatment: A Qualitative Analysis to Inform Strategies for Mitigation, 2021, JCO Oncology Practice
  • Giving patients a voice: a participatory evaluation of patient engagement in Newfoundland and Labrador Health Research, 2020, Research Involvement and Engagement
  • Drug shortage management: A qualitative assessment of a collaborative approach, 2021, PLoS ONE
  • Priority setting during the COVID-19 pandemic: going beyond vaccines, 2021, BMJ Global Health
  • Priority setting and equity in COVID-19 pandemic plans: a comparative analysis of 18 African countries, 2021, Health Policy and Planning

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Marion Danis
  • Lydia Kapiriri
  • Élysée Nouvet
  • Claudia Marcela Vélez
  • Minal Patel

Their work has been published predominantly in the following venues:

  • Abstracts
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • Health Policy OPEN
  • UNC Libraries
  • JCO Oncology Practice

Main fields of study for this researcher are:

  • Health Professions
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Subfields of study include:

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • General Health Professions
  • Emergency Medical Services
  • Health
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Their research covers main topics such as:

  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Disaster Response and Management
  • Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Global Maternal and Child Health

Best Publications

  • The doctor-patient relationship: challenges, opportunities, and strategies

    Susan Dorr Goold;Mack Lipkin

  • Views of US Physicians About Controlling Health Care Costs

    Jon C. Tilburt;Matthew K. Wynia;Matthew K. Wynia;Robert D. Sheeler;Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir

  • Indwelling urinary catheters: a one-point restraint?

    Sanjay Saint;Benjamin A. Lipsky;Susan Dorr Goold

  • Institutional Academic−Industry Relationships

    Eric G. Campbell;Joel S. Weissman;Susan Ehringhaus;Sowmya R. Rao

  • Conflicts regarding decisions to limit treatment: a differential diagnosis.

    Susan Dorr Goold;Brent Williams;Robert M. Arnold

  • Trust, distrust and trustworthiness.

    Susan Dorr Goold

  • Patient-Centered Care and Preference-Sensitive Decision Making

    Carla C. Keirns;Susan Dorr Goold

  • Association Between Health Insurance Literacy and Avoidance of Health Care Services Owing to Cost.

    Renuka Tipirneni;Mary C. Politi;Jeffrey T. Kullgren;Edith C. Kieffer

  • "Listen to the people": public deliberation about social distancing measures in a pandemic.

    Nancy M. Baum;Peter D. Jacobson;Susan D. Goold

  • Maintaining Trust in the Surgeon-Patient Relationship: Challenges for the New Millennium

    David A. Axelrod;Susan Dorr Goold

  • Do unmet expectations for specific tests, referrals, and new medications reduce patients’ satisfaction?

    B. Mitchell Peck;Peter A. Ubel;Debra L. Roter;Susan Dorr Goold

  • Health insurance and discrimination concerns and BRCA1/2 testing in a clinic population.

    Emily A Peterson;Kara J Milliron;Karen E Lewis;Susan D Goold

  • What is public deliberation

    Erika Blacksher;Alice Diebel;Pierre Gerlier Forest;Susan Dorr Goold

  • Trust and the ethics of health care institutions

    Susan Dorr Goold

  • Recognizing bedside rationing: clear cases and tough calls

    Peter A. Ubel;Susan Goold

  • Public Deliberation in Health Policy and Bioethics: Mapping an emerging, interdisciplinary field

    Julia Abelson;Erika A Blacksher;Kathy K Li;Sarah E Boesveld

  • Managed care members talk about trust.

    Susan Dorr Goold;Glenn Klipp

  • Choosing Healthplans All Together: A Deliberative Exercise for Allocating Limited Health Care Resources

    Susan Dorr Goold;Andrea K. Biddle;Glenn Klipp;Charles N. Hall

  • Responses of Medical Schools to Institutional Conflicts of Interest

    Susan H. Ehringhaus;Joel S. Weissman;Jacqueline L. Sears;Susan Dorr Goold

  • Looking Ahead: Addressing Ethical Challenges in Public Health Practice

    Nancy M. Baum;Sarah Elizabeth Gollust;Susan Dorr Goold;Peter D. Jacobson

Frequent Co-Authors

Marion Danis
Marion Danis National Institutes of Health
Matthew K. Wynia
Matthew K. Wynia University of Colorado Denver
Eric G. Campbell
Eric G. Campbell University of Colorado Denver
Peter A. Ubel
Peter A. Ubel Duke University
Julia Abelson
Julia Abelson McMaster University
Peter D. Jacobson
Peter D. Jacobson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Reshma Jagsi
Reshma Jagsi University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Liselotte N. Dyrbye
Liselotte N. Dyrbye University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Debra L. Roter
Debra L. Roter Johns Hopkins University
Benjamin A. Lipsky
Benjamin A. Lipsky University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up flexible, diverse online education options. Many students choose an online bachelor's degree as their entry point, which can lead to careers in counseling, teaching, public relations, or research. For those seeking to advance quickly, online accelerated bachelor's degrees allow you to graduate faster and start your career or graduate studies sooner.

Graduate pathways are also evolving. A online masters degree psychology is popular for aspiring mental health professionals and those interested in human behavior. If you need flexibility or speed, you can consider online master programs that fit ambitious schedules, as well as the shortest edd program online for educators eyeing doctorate-level leadership roles.

These online degrees allow you to tailor your learning pace and budget, while preparing for impactful careers in education, counseling, media, advocacy, and more—all while balancing life’s demands.

Best Scientists Citing Susan Dorr Goold

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles