World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
12142
World Ranking
7728
National Ranking
4145

David A. Pizarro publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David A. Pizarro sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 72 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David A. Pizarro D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David A. Pizarro sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David A. Pizarro is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. Their work spans several fields including neuroscience, psychology, and social sciences, focusing extensively on cognitive neuroscience and social psychology within these broader disciplines.

Their research covers a variety of topics, notably:

  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Ethics in Business and Education
  • Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies

Several papers authored or co-authored by Pizarro reflect these interests. Recent publications include:

  • "A Theory of Moral Praise," 2020, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • "Disgust sensitivity relates to attitudes toward gay men and lesbian women across 31 nations," 2022, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
  • ""False positive" emotions, responsibility, and moral character," 2021, Cognition
  • "A matter of taste: Gustatory sensitivity predicts political ideology," 2020, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • "On the Highway to Hell: Slippery Slope Perceptions in Judgments of Moral Character," 2023, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Frequent collaborators with whom Pizarro has co-authored multiple papers include:

  • Rajen A. Anderson
  • Shaun Nichols
  • Yoel Inbar
  • Benjamin C. Ruisch
  • Bronwyn Monteiro

The scientist's work has been published recurrently in venues such as:

  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • Cognition
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Best Publications

  • Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals

    Yoel Inbar;David A. Pizarro;Paul Bloom

  • Disgust sensitivity predicts intuitive disapproval of gays.

    Yoel Inbar;David A. Pizarro;Joshua Knobe;Paul Bloom

  • The mismeasure of morals: Antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas

    Daniel M. Bartels;David A. Pizarro

  • The intelligence of the moral intuitions: comment on Haidt (2001).

    David A. Pizarro;Paul Bloom

  • The Role of Emotional Intelligence in Anxiety and Depression among Adolescents

    Pablo Fernández-Berrocal;Rocio Alcaide;Natalio Extremera;David Pizarro

  • Disgust Sensitivity, Political Conservatism, and Voting

    Yoel Inbar;David Pizarro;Ravi Iyer;Jonathan Haidt

  • Emotion and Memory Research: A Grumpy Overview

    Linda J. Levine;David A. Pizarro

  • Inference of trustworthiness from intuitive moral judgments.

    Jim A. C. Everett;David A. Pizarro;M. J. Crockett

  • A Person-Centered Approach to Moral Judgment:

    Eric Luis Uhlmann;David A. Pizarro;Daniel Diermeier

  • Nothing more than feelings? The role of emotions in moral judgment

    David Pizarro

  • Moral heuristics. Commentaries. Author's reply

    Cass R. Sunstein;Matthew D. Adler;Christopher J. Anderson;Elizabeth Anderson

  • The motivated use of moral principles

    Eric Luis Uhlmann;David A. Pizarro;David Tannenbaum;Peter H. Ditto

  • Dirty Liberals! Reminders of Physical Cleanliness Influence Moral and Political Attitudes

    Erik G. Helzer;David A. Pizarro

  • Deciding Versus Reacting: Conceptions of Moral Judgment and the Reason-Affect Debate

    Benoît Monin;David A. Pizarro;Jennifer S. Beer

  • Asymmetry in Judgments of Moral Blame and Praise The Role of Perceived Metadesires

    David Pizarro;Eric Uhlmann;Peter Salovey

  • Disgusting smells cause decreased liking of gay men.

    Yoel Inbar;David A. Pizarro;Paul Bloom

  • Bringing character back: How the motivation to evaluate character influences judgments of moral blame.

    David A. Pizarro;David Tannenbaum

  • Parasite stress and pathogen avoidance relate to distinct dimensions of political ideology across 30 nations

    Joshua M. Tybur;Yoel Inbar;Lene Aarøe;Pat Barclay

  • On disgust and moral judgment

    David Pizarro;Yoel Inbar;Chelsea Helion

  • Causal deviance and the attribution of moral responsibility

    David A. Pizarro;Eric Uhlmann;Paul Bloom

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Bloom
Paul Bloom Columbia University
Peter H. Ditto
Peter H. Ditto University of California, Irvine
Peter Salovey
Peter Salovey Yale University
Molly J. Crockett
Molly J. Crockett Yale University
Linda J. Levine
Linda J. Levine University of California, Irvine
Thomas Gilovich
Thomas Gilovich Cornell University
Jennifer S. Beer
Jennifer S. Beer The University of Texas at Austin
Roy F. Baumeister
Roy F. Baumeister University of Queensland
Natalio Extremera
Natalio Extremera University of Malaga

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to numerous related online degrees and evolving career pathways. Many students broaden their skills by pursuing counseling degrees, which are available at schools across the country and through flexible online options. These programs often align closely with psychology, focusing on practical communication, mental health, and ethical counseling techniques.

Several regions offer outstanding opportunities for counseling education. For example, you can discover the best-ranked counseling degree programs in Michigan or review highly sought-after options in the Northeast, such as the popular counseling degrees in New Jersey. If you are interested in urban environments, explore the most popular counseling degree programs in Philadelphia or look to the West Coast for the most popular counseling degree programs in San Francisco.

Graduates of these programs often work as licensed counselors, school advisors, rehabilitation specialists, or pursue further studies in psychology or psychotherapy. Selecting the right program can help you build a fulfilling career supporting the mental wellness of others, whether in clinical, community, or educational settings.

Best Scientists Citing David A. Pizarro

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles