World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
5789
World Ranking
10136
National Ranking
5346

Natalie J. Shook publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Natalie J. Shook sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 97 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Natalie J. Shook D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Natalie J. Shook sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Natalie J. Shook is affiliated with the University of Connecticut in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with a particular focus on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Aging and Gerontology Research

The researcher has contributed to numerous articles, among which recent publications stand out for their focus on mental health and behavioral responses during the COVID-19 pandemic:

  • "Disease avoidance in the time of COVID-19: The behavioral immune system is associated with concern and preventative health behaviors" (2020, PLoS ONE)
  • "Job Insecurity and Financial Concern During the COVID-19 Pandemic Are Associated With Worse Mental Health" (2020, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine)
  • "Adolescents' Motivations to Engage in Social Distancing During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Associations With Mental and Social Health" (2020, Journal of Adolescent Health)
  • "COVID-19 worries and mental health: the moderating effect of age" (2020, Aging & Mental Health)
  • "Exploring facets of the mindful personality: Dispositional mindfulness and the Big Five" (2020, Personality and Individual Differences)

Among frequent publication venues for this researcher are:

  • Current Psychology
  • Innovation in Aging
  • PLoS ONE
  • The International Journal of Aging and Human Development
  • Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

Notable co-authors who have frequently collaborated with Natalie J. Shook include:

  • Jenna M. Wilson
  • Jerin Lee
  • Barış Sevi
  • Ilana Haliwa
  • Holly N. Fitzgerald

Best Publications

  • Job Insecurity and Financial Concern During the COVID-19 Pandemic Are Associated With Worse Mental Health.

    Jenna M Wilson;Jerin Lee;Holly N Fitzgerald;Benjamin Oosterhoff

  • The behavioral immune system and social conservatism: a meta-analysis

    John A. Terrizzi;Natalie J. Shook;Michael A. McDaniel

  • Adolescents' Motivations to Engage in Social Distancing During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Associations With Mental and Social Health.

    Benjamin Oosterhoff;Cara A. Palmer;Jenna Wilson;Natalie Shook

  • Attitude formation through exploration: valence asymmetries.

    Russell H. Fazio;J. Richard Eiser;Natalie J. Shook

  • Disgust: A predictor of social conservatism and prejudicial attitudes toward homosexuals

    John A. Terrizzi;Natalie J. Shook;W. Larry Ventis

  • Looking Up Mindfulness Increases Positive Judgments and Reduces Negativity Bias

    Laura G. Kiken;Natalie J. Shook

  • Interracial Roommate Relationships An Experimental Field Test of the Contact Hypothesis

    Natalie J. Shook;Russell H. Fazio

  • Political ideology, exploration of novel stimuli, and attitude formation

    Natalie J. Shook;Russell H. Fazio

  • Mindfulness, self-compassion, and savoring: Factors that explain the relation between perceived social support and well-being

    Jenna M. Wilson;Audrey Weiss;Natalie J. Shook

  • Disease avoidance in the time of COVID-19: The behavioral immune system is associated with concern and preventative health behaviors.

    Natalie J. Shook;Barış Sevi;Jerin Lee;Benjamin Oosterhoff

  • COVID-19 worries and mental health: the moderating effect of age.

    Jenna M. Wilson;Jerin Lee;Natalie J. Shook

  • Mindfulness and emotional distress: The role of negatively biased cognition

    Laura G. Kiken;Natalie J. Shook

  • Does mindfulness attenuate thoughts emphasizing negativity, but not positivity?

    Laura G. Kiken;Natalie J. Shook

  • Attitude generalization: Similarity, valence, and extremity

    Natalie J. Shook;Russell H. Fazio;J. Richard Eiser

  • Positive Versus Negative Valence: Asymmetries in Attitude Formation and Generalization as Fundamental Individual Differences

    Russell H. Fazio;Evava S. Pietri;Matthew D. Rocklage;Natalie J. Shook

  • Roommate Relationships: A Comparison of Interracial and Same-Race Living Situations

    Natalie J. Shook;Russell H. Fazio

  • Interracial roommate relationships: A mechanism for promoting sense of belonging at university and academic performance

    Natalie J. Shook;Russ Clay

  • Weighting positive versus negative: the fundamental nature of valence asymmetry.

    Evava S. Pietri;Russell H. Fazio;Natalie J. Shook

  • Negativity bias in attitude learning: a possible indicator of vulnerability to emotional disorders?

    Natalie J. Shook;Russell H. Fazio;Michael W. Vasey

  • In the moment and feeling good: Age differences in mindfulness and positive affect.

    Natalie J. Shook;Cameron Ford;JoNell Strough;Rebecca Delaney

  • Techniques for Measuring Selective Exposure: A Critical Review

    Russ Clay;Jessica M. Barber;Natalie J. Shook

Frequent Co-Authors

Russell H. Fazio
Russell H. Fazio The Ohio State University
JoNell Strough
JoNell Strough West Virginia University
J. Richard Eiser
J. Richard Eiser University of Sheffield
Faye Z. Belgrave
Faye Z. Belgrave Virginia Commonwealth University
Cheryl B. McNeil
Cheryl B. McNeil West Virginia University
Michael A. McDaniel
Michael A. McDaniel Virginia Commonwealth University
Daniel W. McNeil
Daniel W. McNeil West Virginia University
Michael W. Vasey
Michael W. Vasey The Ohio State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying psychology, it’s important to explore related fields such as social work, counseling, and human services. These areas often overlap and share foundational skills, opening up diverse career opportunities. Many students are now seeking flexible and affordable pathways by opting for online degree programs.

For those searching for affordable online social work bachelor's degrees in Pennsylvania, there are several accredited institutions to consider. On a broader scale, if location isn’t a concern, you can compare the cheapest online bsw degrees in USA to find programs that suit your budget and career goals.

Specific regions also offer standout options, such as cheapest online social work programs in Boise and affordable online social work programs in Kentucky. Exploring these affordable online degrees can make continuing your education in psychology or related fields more accessible and practical, no matter where you live.

By choosing an online degree in psychology or social work, you can develop in-demand skills and prepare for rewarding careers, all while managing school, work, and personal commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Natalie J. Shook

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles