World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 38 8684 8111 4616 4203 76 20065

Jennifer S. Beer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jennifer S. Beer between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jennifer S. Beer published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2010. 5 of the 82 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2010. 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 3 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 2 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 3 publications
2001 2025

82 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jennifer S. Beer: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 3
2002 1
2003 3
2004 3
2005 3
2006 6
2007 4
2008 1
2009 3
2010 9
2011 2
2012 7
2013 5
2014 2
2015 3
2016 4
2017 3
2018 2
2019 4
2020 4
2021 2
2022 1
2023 2
2024 2
2025 3
Total 82
Download as CSV

Jennifer S. Beer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jennifer S. Beer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 76 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 76
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jennifer S. Beer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jennifer S. Beer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 38
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jennifer S. Beer is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research spans multiple interconnected fields, focusing primarily on psychology, social sciences, and neuroscience. This interdisciplinary approach is reflected in their areas of study and publication record.

The main fields of study associated with their work include:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences
  • Neuroscience

Within these broader categories, Jennifer S. Beer's research engages with several subfields, such as:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

Their work often addresses specific topics relevant to social and behavioral sciences. The prominent themes covered in their publications include:

  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Aging and Gerontology Research

Jennifer S. Beer has contributed to various scientific venues, indicating a diverse publication record. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Collabra Psychology
  • Social and Personality Psychology Compass
  • Social Psychological Bulletin
  • NeuroImage
  • Self and Identity

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Jennifer S. Beer include:

  • "Why don't we know more about the minds of authentic people?" (2021, Social and Personality Psychology Compass)
  • "Hits and misses in the last decade of open science: Researchers from different subfields and career stages offer personal reflections and suggestions" (2023, Social Psychological Bulletin)

Additional notable papers where Jennifer S. Beer is a co-author include:

  • "Reconsidering longstanding assumptions about the role of medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) in social evaluation" (2020, NeuroImage)
  • "Mechanisms of a spotless self-image: Navigating negative, self-relevant feedback" (2020, Self and Identity)
  • "Is Older Indeed Wiser? Identifying Conflict Communication Patterns in Older and Younger Dating Couples" (2023, Communication Methods and Measures)

Frequent collaborators in Jennifer S. Beer's research include:

  • Lisa A. Neff
  • Shaina Munin
  • Anastasia E. Rigney
  • Sydney Okland
  • Serena Brandler

Best Publications

  • Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

    Alexander A. Aarts;Joanna E. Anderson;Christopher J. Anderson;Peter R. Attridge;Peter R. Attridge

  • Positive illusions about the self: short-term benefits and long-term costs.

    Richard W. Robins;Jennifer S. Beer

  • Prefrontal involvement in the regulation of emotion: convergence of rat and human studies

    Gregory J Quirk;Jennifer S Beer

  • Facial expression of emotion.

    Dacher Keltner;Paul Ekman;Gian C. Gonzaga;Jennifer Beer

  • The neural correlates of direct and reflected self-knowledge.

    Kevin N. Ochsner;Jennifer S. Beer;Elaine R. Robertson;Jeffrey C. Cooper

  • Knowing your place: self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups.

    Cameron Anderson;Sanjay Srivastava;Jennifer S. Beer;Sandra E. Spataro

  • The regulatory function of self-conscious emotion: insights from patients with orbitofrontal damage.

    Jennifer S. Beer;Erin A. Heerey;Dacher Keltner;Donatella Scabini

  • Orbitofrontal Cortex and Social Behavior: Integrating Self-monitoring and Emotion-Cognition Interactions

    Jennifer S. Beer;Oliver P. John;Donatella Scabini;Robert T. Knight

  • Neural mechanisms of the testosterone-aggression relation: The role of orbitofrontal cortex

    Pranjal H. Mehta;Jennifer Beer

  • Social cognition: a multi level analysis.

    Jennifer S. Beer;Kevin N. Ochsner

  • Deciding Versus Reacting: Conceptions of Moral Judgment and the Reason-Affect Debate

    Benoît Monin;David A. Pizarro;Jennifer S. Beer

  • How self-evaluations relate to being liked by others: Integrating sociometer and attachment perspectives

    Sanjay Srivastava;Jennifer S. Beer

  • Self and identity as memory

    John F. Kihlstrom;Jennifer S. Beer;Stanley B. Klein

  • Hemispheric Dominance for Emotions, Empathy and Social Behaviour: Evidence from Right and Left Handers with Frontotemporal Dementia.

    R. J. Perry;H. R. Rosen;J. H. Kramer;J. S. Beer

  • Perceiving others' personalities: examining the dimensionality, assumed similarity to the self, and stability of perceiver effects.

    Sanjay Srivastava;Steve Guglielmo;Jennifer S. Beer

  • Implicit self-theories of shyness.

    Jennifer S. Beer

  • Viewpoints: Dialogues on the functional role of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex

    Mauricio R Delgado;Jennifer S Beer;Lesley K Fellows;Scott A Huettel

  • Neural systems of social comparison and the "above-average" effect.

    Jennifer S. Beer;Brent L. Hughes

  • Controlling the Integration of Emotion and Cognition The Role of Frontal Cortex in Distinguishing Helpful From Hurtful Emotional Information

    Jennifer S. Beer;Robert T. Knight;Mark D'Esposito

  • Stereotype threat reinterpreted as a regulatory mismatch.

    Lisa R. Grimm;Arthur B. Markman;W. Todd Maddox;Grant C. Baldwin

  • Methods in social neuroscience

    Eddie Harmon-Jones;Jennifer S. Beer

Frequent Co-Authors

Dacher Keltner
Dacher Keltner University of California, Berkeley
Robert T. Knight
Robert T. Knight University of California, Berkeley
Sanjay K. Srivastava
Sanjay K. Srivastava Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Kevin N. Ochsner
Kevin N. Ochsner Columbia University
Mark D'Esposito
Mark D'Esposito University of California, Berkeley
Michael V. Lombardo
Michael V. Lombardo Italian Institute of Technology
Benoît Monin
Benoît Monin Stanford University
Pranjal H. Mehta
Pranjal H. Mehta University College London
Brian A. Nosek
Brian A. Nosek Center for Open Science
David A. Pizarro
David A. Pizarro Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens the door to a variety of rewarding career pathways, including counseling and mental health services. Many states now offer flexible, accredited programs that can help you quickly transition into these careers with minimal disruption to your current schedule.

If you are considering counseling as a career, it's important to understand the requirements and fastest routes available in your state. For example, you can discover the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Arkansas or learn about the shortest path to becoming a counselor in California. Similar guidance is available for other states, such as options for Colorado accelerated counseling programs and advice on the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Connecticut.

Choosing an online program not only offers flexibility, but may also shorten the time required to achieve licensure, depending on your background and the specific state. Stay informed about evolving requirements and pursue the pathway that best fits your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Jennifer S. Beer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles