World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Miguel A. Quinones

Miguel A. Quinones

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
104
Citations
59367
World Ranking
6909
National Ranking
3642

Miguel A. Quinones publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miguel A. Quinones sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 276 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Miguel A. Quinones D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miguel A. Quinones sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Miguel A. Quinones is affiliated with Houston Methodist in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with notable subfields including Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Plant Science, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, and Surgery.

Their work covers several key topics such as:

  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance

Among recent publications, prominent papers include:

  • Natural History of Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation Quantified by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
  • Coenzyme Q10 for Patients With Cardiovascular Disease (2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
  • Nitrogen and Phosphorus Interplay in Lupin Root Nodules and Cluster Roots (2021, Frontiers in Plant Science)
  • Extracellular Volume in Primary Mitral Regurgitation (2020, JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging)
  • Resolving the Disproportionate Left Ventricular Enlargement in Mitral Valve Prolapse Due to Barlow Disease (2020, JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Miguel A. Quinones include:

  • Dipan J. Shah
  • William A. Zoghbi
  • Sherif F. Nagueh
  • José J. Pueyo
  • Duc T. Nguyen

The scientist's work has been published in multiple outlets, with the most frequent venues being:

  • Methodist DeBakey Cardiovascular Journal
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • UNC Libraries
  • Frontiers in Plant Science

Best Publications

  • Doppler Tissue Imaging: A Noninvasive Technique for Evaluation of Left Ventricular Relaxation and Estimation of Filling Pressures

    Sherif F Nagueh;Katherine J Middleton;Helen A Kopelen;William A Zoghbi

  • Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice

    Helmut Baumgartner;Judy Hung;Javier Bermejo;John B. Chambers

  • Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and doppler echocardiography

    William A Zoghbi;Maurice Enriquez-Sarano;Elyse Foster;Paul A Grayburn

  • Recommendations for quantification of Doppler echocardiography: A report from the Doppler quantification task force of the nomenclature and standards committee of the American Society of Echocardiography

    Miguel A. Quiñones;Catherine M. Otto;Marcus Stoddard;Alan Waggoner

  • ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death)

    Douglas P. Zipes;A. John Camm;Martin Borggrefe;Alfred E. Buxton

  • Guías de Práctica Clínica del ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 sobre el manejo de pacientes con arritmias ventriculares y la prevención de la muerte cardiaca súbita. Versión resumida.

    Douglas P. Zipes;A. John Camm;Martin Borggrefe;Alfred E. Buxton

  • Recommendations for Evaluation of Prosthetic Valves With Echocardiography and Doppler Ultrasound. A Report From the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, Developed in Conjunction With the American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, Cardiac Imaging Committee of the American Heart Association

    William A. Zoghbi;John B. Chambers;Jean G. Dumesnil;Elyse Foster

  • ASE/SCA Guidelines for Performing a Comprehensive Intraoperative Multiplane Transesophageal Echocardiography Examination: Recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography Council for Intraoperative Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Task Force for Certification in Perioperative Transesophageal Echocardiography

    Jack S. Shanewise;Albert T. Cheung;Solomon Aronson;William J. Stewart

  • American Society of Echocardiography Recommendations for Use of Echocardiography in Clinical Trials A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and The Task Force on Echocardiography in Clinical Trials

    John S. Gottdiener;James Bednarz;Richard Devereux;Julius Gardin

  • A new, simplified and accurate method for determining ejection fraction with two-dimensional echocardiography.

    Miguel A. Quiñones;A. D. Waggoner;L. A. Reduto;J. G. Nelson

  • Pulsed Doppler echocardiographic determination of stroke volume and cardiac output: clinical validation of two new methods using the apical window.

    J. F. Lewis;L. C. Kuo;J. G. Nelson;M. C. Limacher

  • ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death

    Douglas P. Zipes;A. John Camm;Martin Borggrefe;Alfred E. Buxton

  • ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging

    Robert C. Hendel;Daniel S. Berman;Marcelo F. Di Carli;Paul A. Heidenreich

  • Doppler Estimation of Left Ventricular Filling Pressure in Sinus Tachycardia A New Application of Tissue Doppler Imaging

    Sherif F. Nagueh;Issam Mikati;Helen A. Kopelen;Katherine J. Middleton

  • Tissue Doppler Imaging Consistently Detects Myocardial Abnormalities in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Provides a Novel Means for an Early Diagnosis Before and Independently of Hypertrophy

    Sherif F. Nagueh;Linda L. Bachinski;Denise Meyer;Rita Hill

  • Determination of parameters of left ventricular diastolic filling with pulsed Doppler echocardiography: comparison with cineangiography.

    R Rokey;L C Kuo;W A Zoghbi;M C Limacher

  • Diabetes mellitus, a predictor of morbidity and mortality in the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) Trials and Registry

    Daniel M. Shindler;John B. Kostis;Salim Yusuf;Miguel A. Quinones

  • Doppler estimation of left ventricular filling pressures in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

    Sherif F. Nagueh;Nasser M. Lakkis;Katherine J. Middleton;William H. Spencer

  • American Society of Echocardiography: recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography

    W. A. Zoghbi;M. Enriquez-Sarano;E. Foster;P. A. Grayburn

  • Guidelines for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death.

    Douglas P Zipes;A John Camm;Martin Borggrefe;Alfred E Buxton

Frequent Co-Authors

Sherif F. Nagueh
Sherif F. Nagueh Houston Methodist
William A. Zoghbi
William A. Zoghbi Houston Methodist
James B. Young
James B. Young Cleveland Clinic
Robert Roberts
Robert Roberts University of Missouri
Mario S. Verani
Mario S. Verani Baylor College of Medicine
William H. Gaasch
William H. Gaasch Tufts University
Robert J. Myerburg
Robert J. Myerburg University of Miami
Dan M. Roden
Dan M. Roden Vanderbilt University Medical Center
George Klein
George Klein Karolinska Institute
Silvia G. Priori
Silvia G. Priori University of Pavia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in expanding your career options beyond traditional medical school? Online degrees in healthcare are rapidly growing in popularity, offering flexibility, lower costs, and opportunities to specialize. Many students explore programs like the shortest online pmhnp programs, which allow nurses to quickly become Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioners and meet urgent mental health needs.

For those seeking administrative roles, pursuing a health administration degree online can open doors to leadership positions in hospitals, clinics, or insurance companies. Cost is often a deciding factor; researching the cost of mha degree can help you find programs that fit your budget while still delivering high-quality education.

For advanced clinical roles in nursing, students may opt for the cheapest online dnp programs to obtain their Doctor of Nursing Practice degree. These diverse pathways empower healthcare professionals with flexible learning options, making it easier to advance or shift careers within the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Miguel A. Quinones

Trending Scientists