World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 47 3459 3187 48 47 121 7128

Xiaojie Chen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Xiaojie Chen between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Xiaojie Chen published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 12.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2022. 54 of the 233 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2022. 2007: 4 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 33 publications 2023: 33 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 31 publications
2007 2025

233 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Xiaojie Chen: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 4
2008 7
2009 4
2010 5
2011 2
2012 12
2013 5
2014 5
2015 12
2016 2
2017 8
2018 14
2019 11
2020 10
2021 12
2022 33
2023 33
2024 23
2025 31
Total 233
Download as CSV

Xiaojie Chen publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xiaojie Chen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 114–123 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 121 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474 121
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Xiaojie Chen D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xiaojie Chen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251 47
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Xiaojie Chen is affiliated with the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China. Their research work spans several interdisciplinary fields, chiefly within biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and social sciences. The scientist has contributed substantially to the study of evolutionary game theory and cooperation, experimental behavioral economics, and the dynamics of evolution and genetic processes.

Their publication record includes a wide range of topics such as evolutionary psychology, opinion dynamics, mathematical and theoretical epidemiology, and ecology models. More specifically, Chen's work frequently explores areas like evolutionary game theory and cooperation, as well as experimental approaches to behavioral economics.

Chen's research has appeared in prominent journals across multiple disciplines. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Chaos Solitons & Fractals
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
  • Applied Mathematics and Computation
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

The scientist has collaborated extensively with peers in the field. Frequent coauthors are:

  • Attila Szolnoki
  • Linjie Liu
  • Shengxian Wang
  • Gang Zhou

Several notable recent papers highlight the range and scope of Chen's research. These include:

  • "Endothelial ZEB1 promotes angiogenesis-dependent bone formation and reverses osteoporosis," 2020, Nature Communications
  • "Tax-based pure punishment and reward in the public goods game," 2020, Physics Letters A
  • "Combination of institutional incentives for cooperative governance of risky commons," 2021, iScience
  • "Coevolutionary dynamics via adaptive feedback in collective-risk social dilemma game," 2023, eLife
  • "Antifungal activity of volatile compounds produced by endophytic Bacillus subtilis DZSY21 against Curvularia lunata," 2020, Annals of Microbiology

Chen's work integrates concepts from sociology and political science, molecular biology, safety research, genetics, and public health. This reflects an interdisciplinary approach that bridges social science methodologies with molecular and genetic investigations.

Best Publications

  • Win-Stay-Lose-Learn Promotes Cooperation in the Spatial Prisoner's Dilemma Game

    Yongkui Liu;Xiaojie Chen;Lin Zhang;Long Wang

  • Promotion of cooperation induced by appropriate payoff aspirations in a small-world networked game.

    Xiaojie Chen;Long Wang

  • Probabilistic sharing solves the problem of costly punishment

    Xiaojie Chen;Xiaojie Chen;Attila Szolnoki;Matjaž Perc

  • Competition and cooperation among different punishing strategies in the spatial public goods game

    Xiaojie Chen;Attila Szolnoki;Matjaž Perc;Matjaž Perc

  • Social dilemmas in an online social network: The structure and evolution of cooperation

    Feng Fu;Xiaojie Chen;Lianghuan Liu;Long Wang

  • First carrot, then stick: how the adaptive hybridization of incentives promotes cooperation.

    Xiaojie Chen;Xiaojie Chen;Tatsuya Sasaki;Tatsuya Sasaki;Åke Brännström;Åke Brännström;Ulf Dieckmann

  • Punishment and inspection for governing the commons in a feedback-evolving game.

    Xiaojie Chen;Attila Szolnoki

  • Risk-driven migration and the collective-risk social dilemma.

    Xiaojie Chen;Attila Szolnoki;Matjaž Perc

  • Replicator dynamics for public goods game with resource allocation in large populations

    Qiang Wang;Nanrong He;Xiaojie Chen

  • Alliance formation with exclusion in the spatial public goods game

    Attila Szolnoki;Xiaojie Chen

  • Interaction stochasticity supports cooperation in spatial Prisoner's dilemma.

    Xiaojie Chen;Feng Fu;Long Wang

  • Promoting cooperation by punishing minority

    Han-Xin Yang;Xiaojie Chen

  • Competitions between prosocial exclusions and punishments in finite populations.

    Linjie Liu;Xiaojie Chen;Attila Szolnoki

  • Probabilistic interconnection between interdependent networks promotes cooperation in the public goods game

    Baokui Wang;Xiaojie Chen;Long Wang

  • Evolutionary dynamics of cooperation in a population with probabilistic corrupt enforcers and violators

    Linjie Liu;Xiaojie Chen;Attila Szolnoki

  • Benefits of tolerance in public goods games.

    Attila Szolnoki;Xiaojie Chen

  • Social tolerance allows cooperation to prevail in an adaptive environment.

    Xiaojie Chen;Xiaojie Chen;Feng Fu;Feng Fu;Long Wang

  • Evolutionary dynamics in the public goods games with switching between punishment and exclusion.

    Linjie Liu;Shengxian Wang;Xiaojie Chen;Matjaž Perc

  • Evolution of public cooperation in a monitored society with implicated punishment and within-group enforcement

    Xiaojie Chen;Tatsuya Sasaki;Matjaž Perc

  • Environmental feedback drives cooperation in spatial social dilemmas

    Attila Szolnoki;Xiaojie Chen

  • Prisoner's Dilemma on community networks

    Xiaojie Chen;Feng Fu;Long Wang

  • Exploring optimal institutional incentives for public cooperation

    Shengxian Wang;Xiaojie Chen;Attila Szolnoki

  • Individual wealth-based selection supports cooperation in spatial public goods games.

    Xiaojie Chen;Attila Szolnoki

Frequent Co-Authors

Long Wang
Long Wang Peking University
Attila Szolnoki
Attila Szolnoki Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Matjaž Perc
Matjaž Perc University of Maribor
Ulf Dieckmann
Ulf Dieckmann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Guangming Xie
Guangming Xie Peking University
Lin Zhang
Lin Zhang Beihang University
Thilo Gross
Thilo Gross Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
Fei Tao
Fei Tao Beihang University
Changyin Sun
Changyin Sun Southeast University
Ming Cao
Ming Cao University of Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens the door to a variety of flexible, online degrees that cater to different career goals. Accelerated programs are especially popular for those who want to advance quickly. For example, 1 year msw programs let students earn a Master of Social Work in a shorter time frame, ideal for entering the field rapidly.

Aspiring psychologists can also find the fastest online psychology degree options, providing an efficient route to starting a career in mental health or research. Cost is a key concern for many—fortunately, there are cheapest cacrep-accredited programs online for individuals seeking affordable pathways into licensed counseling.

Those interested in relationships and family dynamics should explore an online master's degree in marriage and family therapy. These specialized degrees prepare graduates for rewarding roles supporting families and couples.

With so many flexible and affordable online options, students can align their education with both their ambitions and schedules, building a foundation for impactful careers in social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Xiaojie Chen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles